| Literature DB >> 28303246 |
Michelle Shin1, Jung-Wei Chen1, Chi-Yang Tsai2, Raydolfo Aprecio3, Wu Zhang4, Ji Min Yochim1, Naichia Teng5, Mahmoud Torabinejad6.
Abstract
Purpose. To compare the biocompatibility and antimicrobial effectiveness of the new Fast-Set MTA (FS-MTA) with ProRoot MTA (RS-MTA). Methods. The agar overlay method with neutral red dye was used. L929 mouse fibroblast cells were cultured. The liquid and oil extracts and solid test material were placed on the agar overlay, four samples for each material. Phenol was used as the positive control and cottonseed oil and MEM extracts were used as negative controls. Cytotoxicity was examined by measuring the zones of decolorization and evaluating cell lysis under an inverted microscope using the established criteria after 24 and 48 hours. The antimicrobial test was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk-diffusion method against S. mutans, E. faecalis, F. nucleatum, P. gingivalis, and P. intermedia. The size of the zone of inhibition was measured in millimeters. Results. There was no zone of decolorization seen under or around the test materials for FS-MTA and RS-MTA at 24 and 48 hours. The antimicrobial test demonstrated no inhibitory effect of FS-MTA or RS-MTA on any bacterial species after 24 and 48 hours. Conclusions. There was no cytotoxicity or bacterial inhibition observed by the new Fast-Set MTA when compared to the ProRoot MTA after setting.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28303246 PMCID: PMC5337838 DOI: 10.1155/2017/2071247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Cytotoxicity evaluation of FS-MTA and RS-MTA, using evaluation criteria for agar diffusion test (ISO 7405, 2008). For zone index, 0 indicates no detectable decolorization zone; a score of 5 indicates a zone involving the entire dish. For lysis index, a score of 0 indicates no observable cytotoxicity, 5 indicates > 80% of the decolorized zone affected. For interpretation of cytotoxicity, score of 0 indicates being noncytotoxic, and 3 indicates severe toxicity.
| Material | 24 hours | 48 hours | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zone index | Lysis index | Interpretation | Zone index | Lysis index | Interpretation | |
| MEM (−control) | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic |
| Cottonseed oil (−control) | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic |
| Phenol (+control) | 5 | 5 | Severely cytotoxic | 5 | 5 | Severely cytotoxic |
| RS-MTA solid | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic |
| RS-MTA MEM | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic |
| RS-MTA oil | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic |
| FS-MTA solid | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic |
| FS-MTA MEM | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic |
| FS-MTA oil | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic | 0 | 0 | Noncytotoxic |
Figure 1(a) FS-MTA oil sample at the border of the filter paper, (b) negative control, MEM, and (c) positive control, phenol. The cells are intact and in monolayer, with uptake of neutral red dye, indicating vitality of the cells, 100x.
Measurements of zone of inhibition in millimeters (mm) at 24 and 48 hours for RS-MTA and FS-MTA solid, extract, and oil samples at 24 and 48 hours on bacterial species, and N = 4.
| Material |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | |
| PBS (−control) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| NaOCl 5.25% (+control) | 29.17 ± 0.29 | 29.17 ± 0.29 | 25.67 ± 2.31 | 25.67 ± 2.31 | 28.33 ± 2.47 | 28.33 ± 2.47 | 9.67 ± 1.15 | 9.67 ± 1.15 | 10.00 ± 0.50 | 10.00 ± 0.50 |
| RS-MTA PBS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS-MTA oil | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS-MTA solid | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| FS-MTA PBS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| FS-MTA oil | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| FS-MTA solid | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Figure 2Agar diffusion test to measure the inhibition of FS-MTA and RS-MTA on bacterial growth; this particular grouping is result for E. faecalis. (a) Positive control, NaOCl 5.25%, (b) negative control, PBS, (c) RS-MTA solid, (d) FS-MTA solid, (e) RS-MTA oil, (f) FS-MTA oil, (g) RS-MTA PBS, and (h) FS-MTA PBS. Note that there is no zone of inhibition in any of the samples of RS-MTA or FS-MTA.