| Literature DB >> 28302110 |
Santiago Palacios1, Fernando Losa2, Damián Dexeus3, Javier Cortés4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To assess the effect of a 12-day treatment using a vaginal gel based on niosomes containing hyaluronic acid, ß-glucan, alpha-glucan oligosaccharide, Coriolus versicolor, Asian centella, Azadirachta indica and Aloe vera on vaginal microbiota, cervical epithelization and vaginal health.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical epithelization; Coriolus versicolor; Niosomes; Vaginal gel; Vaginal health; Vaginal microbiota
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28302110 PMCID: PMC5356315 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-017-0374-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.809
Vaginal health index
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elasticity | None | Poor | Fair | Good | Excellent |
| Fluid volume (pooling of secretions) | None | Scant amount, vault not entirely covered | Superficial amount, vault entirely covered | Moderate amount of dryness (small areas of dryness on cotton-tip applicator) | Normal amount (fully saturates on cotton-tip applicator) |
| pH | ≥6.1 | 5.6–6.0 | 5.1–5.5 | 4.7–5.0 | <4.6 |
| Epithelial integrity | Petechiae noted before contact | Bleeds with light contact | Bleeds with scraping | Not friable, thin epithelium | Normal |
| Moisture (coating) | None, surface inflamed | None, surface not inflamed | Minimal | Moderate | Normal |
Fig. 1Changes in the study parameters before and after 12-day treatment with a Coriolus versicolor-based vaginal gel
Results of colposcopy score
| Patients | Colposcopy epithelization scorea | |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline (visit 1) | End of study (visit 2) | |
| 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 3 | 3 | 4 |
| 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 5 | 2 | 5 |
| 6 | 3 | 3 |
| 7 | 3 | 4 |
| 8 | 2 | 4 |
| 9 | 4 | 5 |
| 10 | 3 | 4 |
| 11 | 4 | 5 |
| 12 | 4 | 5 |
| 13 | 4 | 5 |
| 14 | 3 | 5 |
| 15 | 5 | 5 |
| 16 | 4 | 5 |
| 17 | 2 | 4 |
| 18 | 4 | 5 |
| 19 | 3 | 5 |
| 20 | 2 | 4 |
| 21 | 3 | 4 |
a5-point Likert scale from 5: no ectopy to 1: severe ectopy with bleeding
Fig. 2Colposcopic images of three patients before and after applying test product
Results of vaginal microbiota
| Patients | Vaginal microbiota scorea | |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline (visit 1) | End of study (visit 2) | |
| 1 | 4 | 5 |
| 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 6 | 2 | 4 |
| 7 | 3 | 3 |
| 8 | 4 | 2 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 |
| 10 | 3 | 5 |
a5-point Likert scale from 5: no deterioration of vaginal microbiota (normal) to 1: very severe deterioration (alteration of all species evaluated)
Changes in Lactobacillus spp. concentration and pH
| Patients |
| Vaginal pH | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (visit 1) | End of study (visit 2) | Baseline (visit 1) | End of study (visit 2) | |
| 1 | 1 × 108 | 2 × 108 | 4.2 | 5.4 |
| 2 | 3 × 108 | 5 × 108 | 4.8 | 4.2 |
| 3 | 2 × 109 | 3 × 109 | 3.9 | 3.6 |
| 4 | 5 × 108 | 5 × 108 | 4 | 3.8 |
| 5 | 5 × 109 | 5 × 109 | 3.8 | 3.6 |
| 6 | <5 × 109 | 3 × 108 | 5.2 | 3.8 |
| 7 | 5 × 108 | <5 × 105 | 4.7 | 4.4 |
| 9 | 1 × 108 | 3 × 108 | 4 | 4.2 |
| 10 | <5 × 105 | 5 × 105 | 4.2 | 4 |
| 11 | 4 × 108 | 3 × 108 | 4 | 4 |
Patient #8 was excluded because of sampling handling error