Literature DB >> 28301984

Comparisons of ergonomic evaluation tools (ALLA, RULA, REBA and OWAS) for farm work.

Yong-Ku Kong1, Sung-Yong Lee1, Kyung-Suk Lee2, Dae-Min Kim3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to validate the agricultural lower limb assessment (ALLA) ergonomic checklist, which was developed for various agricultural tasks in Korea.
METHODS: One hundred and ninety-six working postures were selected from the real agricultural tasks to verify ALLA, a lower limb body posture assessment tool, and then evaluated by 16 ergonomic experts. Hit rate, quadratic weighted κ, one-way analysis of variance and t-test analyses were applied to compare ALLA with other assessment tools.
RESULTS: ALLA analysis had a superior hit rate with ergonomic expert assessment compared with other assessment tools. Quadratic weighted κ analysis also showed that ALLA provided superior estimates of risk levels for farm working postures. DISCUSSION: ALLA would be an appropriate assessment tool to estimate risk factors for various lower limb body postures which frequently occur in agricultural tasks in Korea. ALLA is a simple and accurate risk assessment tool that could be usefully applied to identify and mitigate risk factors and work-related musculoskeletal disorders in agricultural tasks, and also to evaluate the effects of control and intervention for working conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ovako working posture analysis system; agricultural lower limb assessment; ergonomic risk assessment tools; rapid entire body assessment; rapid upper limb assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28301984     DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1306960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Occup Saf Ergon        ISSN: 1080-3548


  8 in total

1.  Latent Ergonomics Maps: Real-Time Visualization of Estimated Ergonomics of Human Movements.

Authors:  Lorenzo Vianello; Waldez Gomes; Freek Stulp; Alexis Aubry; Pauline Maurice; Serena Ivaldi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF PHYSICAL WORK EXPOSURES AMONG ELECTRONIC WASTE WORKERS AT AGBOGBLOSHIE, ACCRA GHANA.

Authors:  Augustine A Acquah; Clive D'Souza; Bernard J Martin; John Arko-Mensah; Paul K Botwe; Prudence Tettey; Duah Dwomoh; Afua Amoabeng Nti; Lawrencia Kwarteng; Sylvia Takyi; Isabella A Quakyi; Thomas G Robins; Julius N Fobil
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.656

3.  Risk Assessment for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Forestry: A Comparison between RULA and REBA in the Manual Feeding of a Wood-Chipper.

Authors:  Margherita Micheletti Cremasco; Ambra Giustetto; Federica Caffaro; Andrea Colantoni; Eugenio Cavallo; Stefano Grigolato
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Systematic Comparison of OWAS, RULA, and REBA Based on a Literature Review.

Authors:  Dohyung Kee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Development of modified rapid entire body assessment (MOREBA) method for predicting the risk of musculoskeletal disorders in the workplaces.

Authors:  Saeid Yazdanirad; Gholamhossein Pourtaghi; Mehdi Raei; Mohammad Ghasemi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Automatic real-time occupational posture evaluation and select corresponding ergonomic assessments.

Authors:  Po-Chieh Lin; Yu-Jung Chen; Wei-Shin Chen; Yun-Ju Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Comparison of LEBA and RULA Based on Postural Load Criteria and Epidemiological Data on Musculoskeletal Disorders.

Authors:  Dohyung Kee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Application of AULA Risk Assessment Tool by Comparison with Other Ergonomic Risk Assessment Tools.

Authors:  Kyeong-Hee Choi; Dae-Min Kim; Min-Uk Cho; Chae-Won Park; Seoung-Yeon Kim; Min-Jung Kim; Yong-Ku Kong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.