Literature DB >> 28301621

Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in the United States: Analysis of Data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

Sean P McGregor, Michael E Farhangian, Karen E Huang, Steven R Feldman.   

Abstract

<p>Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) affects both adult and pediatric patients, and multiple practitioners encounter and manage AD. However, differences with regard to the treatment of AD between specialties are not well characterized.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to determine if there is a difference between dermatologists and non-dermatology specialties with regard to treatment strategies for AD and to describe those differences.
METHODS: Data from the 1993-2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Care (NHAMCS) Surveys were used to characterize outpatient visits made for AD. Differences in demographic, geographic and seasonal characteristics were obtained and compared. Additionally, the frequency of medications prescribed at dermatologist visits were compared to other specialties. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of modalities used in the treatment of atopic dermatitis between dermatologists and non-dermatology specialties.
RESULTS: An estimated 3.7 million visits for AD were made to outpatient offices and hospital departments from 1993 to 2010. The rates per capita of visits for atopic dermatitis were similar when evaluated by gender and season. However, Caucasians were almost 50% less likely than African Americans or individuals of other minority races to have visits for AD. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) were mentioned at 52% of visits, and dermatologists were more likely than non-dermatologists to prescribe TCS, emollients, and topical calcineurin inhibitors.
CONCLUSIONS: Dermatologists were more likely to recommend TCS, emollients, and topical calciuneurin inhibitors for the treatment of AD. Dermatologists were also more likely to prescribe higher potency TCS in comparison to non-dermatology specialties, and these differences may ultimately affect patient care. As a result, there remains a disparity between dermatologists and non-dermatology specialties with regard to evidence-based approaches to the treatment of AD.</p> <p><em>J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(3):250-255.</em></p>.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28301621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol        ISSN: 1545-9616            Impact factor:   2.114


  4 in total

1.  Different Approaches to Atopic Dermatitis by Allergists, Dermatologists, and Pediatricians.

Authors:  Suzieni Padoin Zuccolo de Bortoli; Herberto José Chong Neto; Nelson Augusto Rosário Filho
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2021-12-03

2.  Steroid Phobia: A Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Interventions.

Authors:  Marissa Contento; Abigail Cline; Marian Russo
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 7.403

Review 3.  Chronic itch in African Americans: an unmet need.

Authors:  Giuseppe Ingrasci; Nour El-Kashlan; Andrew Alexis; Gil Yosipovitch
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.017

4.  Transcriptomic analysis of atopic dermatitis in African Americans is characterized by Th2/Th17-centered cutaneous immune activation.

Authors:  Shannon Wongvibulsin; Nishadh Sutaria; Suraj Kannan; Martin Prince Alphonse; Micah Belzberg; Kyle A Williams; Isabelle D Brown; Justin Choi; Youkyung Sophie Roh; Thomas Pritchard; Raveena Khanna; Amarachi C Eseonu; Jaroslaw Jedrych; Carly Dillen; Madan M Kwatra; Anna L Chien; Nathan Archer; Luis A Garza; Xinzhong Dong; Sewon Kang; Shawn G Kwatra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.