Literature DB >> 28301340

MICROPERIMETRY IN BEST VITELLIFORM MACULAR DYSTROPHY.

Maurizio Battaglia Parodi1, Niccolò Castellino1, Pierluigi Iacono2, Itay Chowers3, Theodoros Empeslidis4, Michaella Goldstein5, Francesco Bandello1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate retinal sensitivity in eyes with all the clinical stages of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD).
METHODS: Thirty-two patients affected by VMD in subclinical, vitelliform, pseudohypopyon, vitelliruptive, and atrophic stages were enrolled in this prospective cross-sectional study. Patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, including determination of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), staging of the disease (Gass's classification), and microperimetry by means of the macular integrity assessment microperimeter. The primary outcome measure was to describe the alterations in the retinal sensitivity of eyes affected by VMD in different stages. Secondary outcome measures included correlations between retinal sensitivity and best-corrected visual acuity and the correlation between the VMD stage and the specific microperimetry pattern.
RESULTS: Mean retinal sensitivity was reduced in all the VMD stages. Nevertheless, vitelliform, pseudohypopyon, and vitelliruptive stages turned out to be very similar, especially within 10°. Fixation was classified as stable in 27 eyes (44.2%), relatively unstable in 16 eyes (26.2%), and unstable in 18 eyes (29.5%). Fixation stability correlated both with the disease stage and best-corrected visual acuity.
CONCLUSION: VMD is characterized by complex microperimetric abnormalities, involving the whole macular area. Microperimetry may contribute to the global clinical assessment of patients affected by VMD and could be used in future therapeutic approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28301340     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  6 in total

1.  Natural course of the vitelliform stage in best vitelliform macular dystrophy: a five-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Maurizio Battaglia Parodi; Francesco Romano; Alessandro Arrigo; Carlo Di Nunzio; Alessio Buzzotta; Giorgio Alto; Francesco Bandello
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Quantitative Assessment of Macular Neovascularization in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Maurizio Battaglia Parodi; Alessandro Arrigo; Francesco Bandello
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Multimodal Imaging in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Jose Ronaldo Lima de Carvalho; Maarjaliis Paavo; Lijuan Chen; John Chiang; Stephen H Tsang; Janet R Sparrow
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Structure-Function Correlation Using OCT Angiography And Microperimetry In Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Marta Alonso-Plasencia; Rodrigo Abreu-González; Mario Alberto Gómez-Culebras
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-11

5.  Clinical Correlation Between Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers and Retinal Sensitivity in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Maurizio Battaglia Parodi; Lorenzo Bianco; Alessandro Arrigo; Andrea Saladino; Alessio Antropoli; Adelaide Pina; Alessandro Marchese; Emanuela Aragona; Hassan Farah Rashid; Francesco Bandello
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.048

6.  Disease expression caused by different variants in the BEST1 gene: genotype and phenotype findings in bestrophinopathies.

Authors:  Katarzyna Nowomiejska; Fadi Nasser; Katarina Stingl; Simone Schimpf-Linzenbold; Saskia Biskup; Agnieszka Brzozowska; Robert Rejdak; Susanne Kohl; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.988

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.