Literature DB >> 28301193

An illustration of the effects of fluctuations in test information on measurement error, the attenuation of effect sizes, and diagnostic reliability.

Brian P O'Connor1.   

Abstract

Measurement precision often fluctuates across latent trait continuums. Plots of test information are typically provided in item response theory (IRT) investigations, but the numerical values for test information are not readily interpretable. This article draws attention to the important, nonlinear relationships between test information, location-specific standard errors of measurement, and location-specific reliability. It provides a method for examining the attenuation in effect sizes (correlations) that is caused by fluctuating levels of measurement error. It also outlines the conditions under which fluctuating measurement error influences effect sizes. The effect of fluctuating error on effect sizes can be more serious than what is predicted by the well-known correction for attenuation formula that is based on constant reliability coefficients. The relationship between levels of test information and diagnostic reliability is also examined. Higher levels of test information are required for diagnostic reliability than for the prevention of effect size attenutation. Data from previously published IRT studies in personality and abnormal psychology are used to illustrate these phenomena. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28301193     DOI: 10.1037/pas0000471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  4 in total

1.  Measurement precision of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and its short forms in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Franco Franchignoni; Andrea Giordano; Giorgio Ferriero; Marco Monticone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Estimating classification consistency of screening measures and quantifying the impact of measurement bias.

Authors:  Oscar Gonzalez; A R Georgeson; William E Pelham; Rachel T Fouladi
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2021-05-17

3.  The Dunn Worry Questionnaire and the Paranoia Worries Questionnaire: new assessments of worry.

Authors:  Daniel Freeman; Jessica C Bird; Bao S Loe; David Kingdon; Helen Startup; David M Clark; Anke Ehlers; Emma Černis; Gail Wingham; Nicole Evans; Rachel Lister; Katherine Pugh; Jacinta Cordwell; Graham Dunn
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  The revised Green et al., Paranoid Thoughts Scale (R-GPTS): psychometric properties, severity ranges, and clinical cut-offs.

Authors:  Daniel Freeman; Bao S Loe; David Kingdon; Helen Startup; Andrew Molodynski; Laina Rosebrock; Poppy Brown; Bryony Sheaves; Felicity Waite; Jessica C Bird
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 7.723

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.