The paramedian forehead flap is a great option for restoration of complex nasal defects. For full-thickness defects, it may be used alone or in combination with other methods. We present a patient with a basal cell carcinoma on the distal nose treated by Mohs micrographic surgery, and a resulting full-thickness defect repaired with paramedian forehead flap combined with a hinge flap. For optimal results with the paramedian forehead flap, adequate surgical planning, patient orientation and meticulous surgical technique are imperative.
The paramedian forehead flap is a great option for restoration of complex nasal defects. For full-thickness defects, it may be used alone or in combination with other methods. We present a patient with a basal cell carcinoma on the distal nose treated by Mohs micrographic surgery, and a resulting full-thickness defect repaired with paramedian forehead flap combined with a hinge flap. For optimal results with the paramedian forehead flap, adequate surgical planning, patient orientation and meticulous surgical technique are imperative.
The paramedian forehead flap (PFF) is a single flap for restoration of complex nasal
defects. It is the mainstay for reconstruction of large and deep wounds located on
the distal nose (tip and ala), including full-thickness defects.[1,2] The PFF can distinctively restore contour, texture, projection
of the nasal tip and convexity of the ala, especially when combined with cartilage
grafting.[1] For
full-thickness defects, PFF may be used alone or in combination with other methods
to restore nasal lining.[3]Prior to reconstruction, surgical margins should be completely evaluated by Mohs
micrographic surgery (if available) since tumor recurrence beneath a PFF would be
catastrophic.
CASE REPORT
A 65-year-old man presented to the Department of Dermatology with a 1.8 x 2.0 cm
erythematous nodule involving the nasal tip, left ala, soft triangles and collumela.
Biopsy revealed an infiltrative basal cell carcinoma.The patient was submitted to Mohs micrographic surgery under local anesthesia
(bupivacaine and lidocaine) combined with an oral benzodiazepine for additional
comfort. After 3 stages, clear margins were achieved. The resulting defect measured
2.4 x 2.5 cm and affected the nasal tip, nasal dorsum, left ala, soft triangles and
collumela (Figure 1). The lower lateral
cartilage was partially removed and a portion of the defect had a full-thickness
component. Due to the defect extension, it was opted to repair it with a PFF
associated with a hinge flap.
Figura 1
Surgical defect involving the nasal tip, nasal dorsum, left nasal ala,
soft triangles and collumela.
Surgical defect involving the nasal tip, nasal dorsum, left nasal ala,
soft triangles and collumela.Initially, in order to restore nasal lining, a hinge flap based on the nasalis muscle
was performed from the nasal sidewall and nasal dorsum (Figure 2). Prior to suturing it in place, the flap was
de-epithelialized. After that, the nasal sidewall was closed primarily. For better
support and nasal tip projection, a cartilage graft was harvested from the left
auricular concha through a posterior incision and sutured on the nasal tip.
Figure 2
A) Full-thickness defect on the left nasal ala.
B) Hinge flap incised on the left nasal sidewall and
nasal dorsum. The arrow illustrates the 180 º movement to be performed
by the flap. C) Flap positioned to recreate the nasal
lining. D) Flap sutured in place. The nasal sidewall was
closed primarily. Note cartilage graft sutured on the nasal tip.
A) Full-thickness defect on the left nasal ala.
B) Hinge flap incised on the left nasal sidewall and
nasal dorsum. The arrow illustrates the 180 º movement to be performed
by the flap. C) Flap positioned to recreate the nasal
lining. D) Flap sutured in place. The nasal sidewall was
closed primarily. Note cartilage graft sutured on the nasal tip.After mucosal restoration and cartilage grafting, the PFF was designed based on the
left suprathroclear artery. The pedicle (1.2 cm width) was demarcated 1.5 cm lateral
to the midline. Then a template of the defect was made and demarcated on the
forehead (Figure 3). The flap was then incised,
elevated and sutured in two layers onto the primary defect. The forehead was closed
primarily in three layers and its upper portion was left to heal by secondary
intention.
Figure 3
Paramedian forehead flap demarcated on the forehead with an ipsilateral
pedicle (dashed) based on the left suprathroclear artery
Paramedian forehead flap demarcated on the forehead with an ipsilateral
pedicle (dashed) based on the left suprathroclear arteryAfter three weeks, the patient was submitted to the second stage, which consisted of
pedicle division and thinning of the proximal portion of the flap after careful
elevation (Figure 4). Four months
postoperative, the patient had a satisfactory result with nasal contour restoration
and functional preservation, without complaints of breathing difficulties (Figure 5).
Figure 4
Three weeks after the first stage. Note the superior donor area on the
forehead left to heal by second intention
Figure 5
A and B) 4 months postoperatively with contour
and texture restoration, and adequate nasal tip pro- A B jection
Three weeks after the first stage. Note the superior donor area on the
forehead left to heal by second intentionA and B) 4 months postoperatively with contour
and texture restoration, and adequate nasal tip pro- A B jection
DISCUSSION
The nose is one of the most common locations for skin cancer and frequently
represents a challenge for reconstruction after surgical defects. For larger defects
on the distal nose, options that produce good functional and aesthetic outcomes are
limited. When wounds are extensive, deep, and or involve missing cartilage or
mucosal lining, no other repair can approach the consistency and predictability of
the PFF.[1] Full-thickness defects
should be repaired in three layers: mucosal repair, cartilage grafting and soft
tissue restoration.PFF should be thought of as a robust surface covering that can provide soft tissue
thickness but not structural support. Nasal lining and structural cartilage are the
infrastructures that must be either intact, supplemented, and or restored prior to
PFF.[4] Options to restore
small mucosal defects (<1cm) include a turnover hinge flap, turndown of a
forehead flap extension, a full-thickness skin graft (FTSG), and bipedicle
vestibular skin advancement flap. Larger lining restoration may require a turnover
forehead flap, FTSG vascularized by an overlying PFF, or intranasal lining flaps
(septal mucoperichondrial hinge flap, composite septal chondromucosal pivotal
flap).[5,6] Intranasal mucosal flaps are difficult to perform
without sedation or general anesthesia. The other options mentioned above, however,
may be successfully executed under local anesthesia. In the present case, a hinge
flap from the nasal sidewall and nasal dorsum was performed due to the relative
small size of the mucosal defect.Cartilage grafts are either structural (native cartilage present but additional
needed for support) or restorative (replacing what was removed). Structural
functions of cartilage include: 1) preventing tissue contraction and distortion; 2)
bracing heavy flap tissue; 3) maintaining airway patency and augmenting the internal
nasal valve; and 4) achieving contour support (i.e. nasal tip graft for better
projection).[1,2] Donor sites for cartilage grafts may
include the antihelix (scaphoid fossa) and the conchal bowl.[7]PFF may be performed in two or three stages. For most patients, the two-stage
approach is safely performed by debulking the distal portion of the flap in the
first stage. As long as a thin layer of subdermal fat is preserved, then the
supratrochlear artery is protected.[8] The three-stage approach may be used for more complex defects or
according to the surgeon´s preference.[9]The forehead should be approximated as much as possible without tension. When
significant tension is noted, the remaining wound should heal by second
intention.[1,2] The use of FTSG or STSG for the remaining donor site
closure can result in a large “patchy scar”.Potential complications of the PFF include bleeding, poor scarring, infection,
dehiscence, distortion of free margins and flap necrosis. The safety of performing
the PFF in an outpatient setting has been well documented, with low complication
rates when performed with adequate technique.[10]The PFF is a valuable flap in the repair of large and deep nasal defects following
Mohs micrographic surgery. For full-thickness defects, a hinge flap should be
considered to restore nasal lining. Good surgical planning, patient orientation and
meticulous surgical technique are imperative for optimal results.