| Literature DB >> 28300575 |
Kossivi Dantey1, Karen Schoedel1, Oleksandr Yergiyev1, David Bartlett2, Uma N M Rao3.
Abstract
In this study the histologic grade of dedifferentiated liposarcomas was correlated with outcome in surgically resected specimens in 55 patients over a 19-year period at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. The tumors were located in the retroperitoneum (N=35); the extremities and thigh (N=16), and the remainder involved the spermatic cord and head and neck. Most tumors were large (mean=21 cm.) Follow-up was available in all 55 patients (median=36 months). Forty-one tumors classified as high-grade dedifferentiated liposarcoma (HG-DDLPS) had mitotically active pleomorphic and spindle cells and foci of necrosis. They included tumors with foci of smooth muscle differentiation (N=12), osteosarcoma (N=4), and myxoid areas (N=9). Fourteen tumors classified as low-grade dedifferentiated liposarcoma (LG-DDLPS) displayed a predominantly bland, monomorphic, spindle cell population with few mitoses and scant necrosis. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for statistical analysis. All tumors had unequivocal foci of well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detected amplification of MDM2 in 29 cases. Twenty of 41 patients (49%) with HG-DDLPS died of tumor, and two patients died with LG-DDLPS (14%). The overall survival of patients with LG-DDLPS was significantly longer (P=.02). The median survival was 113 months for the LG-DDLPS and 48 months for the HG-DDLPS. Metastases (N=4) occurred only in the high-grade tumors and were independent of the type of heterologous differentiation. Patients with HG-DDLPS were at a greater risk of earlier death. Distinction between the two groups is important for patient selection for possible adjuvant therapy.Entities:
Keywords: High-grade dedifferentiated liposarcoma; Histological grade; Low-grade dedifferentiated liposarcoma; MDM2; Myxoid liposarcoma; Survival
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28300575 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.02.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Pathol ISSN: 0046-8177 Impact factor: 3.466