| Literature DB >> 28300143 |
Athanasios Damialis1,2,3, Evangelos Kaimakamis4, Maria Konoglou4, Ioannis Akritidis5, Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann1,2, Dimitrios Gioulekas6.
Abstract
Airborne pollen and fungal spores are monitored mainly in highly populated, urban environments, for allergy prevention purposes. However, their sources can frequently be located outside cities' fringes with more vegetation. So as to shed light to this paradox, we investigated the diversity and abundance of airborne pollen and fungal spores at various environmental regimes. We monitored pollen and spores using an aircraft and a car, at elevations from sea level to 2,000 m above ground, in the region of Thesssaloniki, Greece. We found a total of 24 pollen types and more than 15 spore types. Pollen and spores were detected throughout the elevational transect. Lower elevations exhibited higher pollen concentrations in only half of plant taxa and higher fungal spore concentrations in only Ustilago. Pinaceae and Quercus pollen were the most abundant recorded by airplane (>54% of the total). Poaceae pollen were the most abundant via car measurements (>77% of the total). Cladosporium and Alternaria spores were the most abundant in all cases (aircraft: >69% and >17%, car: >45% and >27%, respectively). We conclude that pollen and fungal spores can be diverse and abundant even outside the main source area, evidently because of long-distance transport incidents.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28300143 PMCID: PMC5353600 DOI: 10.1038/srep44535
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Average pollen concentrations (m−3 of air) by aircraft and car (total of 72 samples from 9 dates).
| Taxon | Aircraft records | Car records | % Change between sampling means ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average concentration (pollen m−3 of air) | Contribution to the total concentration | Average concentration (pollen m−3 of air) | Contribution to the total concentration | ||
| Pinaceae | 123 ± 36 | 28.4% | 14 ± 5 | 5.6% | +773% (*) |
| 112 ± 35 | 25.9% | 9 ± 5 | 3.5% | +1184% (ns) | |
| Poaceae | 76 ± 16 | 17.6% | 196 ± 56 | 77.7% | −61% (***) |
| 22 ± 8 | 5.0% | 11 ± 7 | 4.5% | +89% (ns) | |
| 18 ± 9 | 4.2% | 1 ± 1 | 0.6% | +1184% (*) | |
| Cupressaceae | 17 ± 7 | 3.8% | 3 ± 3 | 1.1% | +520% (ns) |
| 14 ± 6 | 3.3% | 3 ± 3 | 1.0% | +442% (ns) | |
| Urticaceae | 13 ± 8 | 3.0% | 2 ± 2 | 1.0% | +437% (**) |
| Oleaceae | 7 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| 6 | 1.4% | 1 | 0.3% | +765% | |
| 6 ± 2 | 1.3% | 2 ± 2 | 0.7% | +232% (*) | |
| 4 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a | |
| Chenopodiaceae | 3 ± 2 | 0.7% | 5 ± 6 | 2.1% | −46% (***) |
| Typhaceae | 2 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Rosaceae | 2 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Apiaceae | 1 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| 1 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a | |
| 1 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a | |
| 1 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a | |
| Asteroideae | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.3% | +42% |
| Cichorioideae | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.6% | −67% |
| Juncaceae | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Myrtaceae | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.6% | −65% |
| Cyperaceae | 0 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.7% | −76% |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | + | |||
Contributions (%) to the total pollen amount are given per taxon (in descending order for the aircraft records), along with differences between sampling means (in parenthesis results from one-way, weighted-moments ANOVA is given, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, ns: not significant relationship).
Statistical analysis was performed for those taxa whose pollen contributed more than 0.5% to the total pollen concentration, respectively, for both car and aircraft sampling.
Factorial Regression results of pollen concentrations (m−3 of air) for 10 taxa, against habitat type (urban environment, semi-urban and natural ecosystem), elevation (0–2000 m) and their interaction effect.
| Plant taxon | Partial correlations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat type (1) | Elevation (2) | (1)*(2) | |||
| Chenopodiaceae | 0.001 | 0.21 | +0.42 | +0.36 | −0.41 |
| Cupressaceae | 0.001 | 0.61 | −0.75 | −0.73 | +0.70 |
| 0.001 | 0.07 | +0.24 | ns | ns | |
| Pinaceae | 0.001 | 0.52 | −0.29 | −0.25 | +0.42 |
| 0.001 | 0.29 | +0.47 | +0.32 | −0.37 | |
| Poaceae | 0.001 | 0.61 | −0.73 | −0.71 | +0.67 |
| 0.001 | 0.55 | +0.49 | +0.18 | −0.36 | |
| 0.001 | 0.23 | −0.46 | −0.38 | +0.42 | |
| 0.001 | 0.14 | −0.30 | −0.31 | +0.27 | |
| Urticaceae | 0.001 | 0.50 | +0.50 | +0.21 | −0.34 |
Partial correlation coefficients, p and R2 are given.
For partial correlations, “+” indicates a positive correlation, “−” a negative correlation; “ns” indicates a non-significant relationship (p > 0.05).
Figure 1Factorial regression plots of airborne pollen concentrations per cubic metre of air (dependent variable) for 10 taxa (Fig. 1(a–j)), against habitat type (urban environment, semi-urban and natural ecosystem) and elevation (0–2000 m).
Habitat codes: 1: urban environment, 2: semi-urban environment, 3: natural environment. Elevation codes: 1: lower than 300 m, 2: 301–600 m, 3: 601–900 m, 4: 901–1200 m, 5: 1201–1500 m, 6: higher than 1500 m. Spline fitting has been applied in all cases (curve stiffness equals to 0.5).
Average fungal spore concentrations (m−3 of air) by aircraft and car (total of 72 samples from 9 dates).
| Taxon | Aircraft records | Car records | % Change between sampling means ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average concentration (spores m−3 of air) | Contribution to the total concentration | Average concentration (spores m−3 of air) | Contribution to the total concentration | ||
| 1862 ± 523 | 69.6% | 1074 ± 397 | 45.3% | +73% (***) | |
| 462 ± 139 | 17.3% | 655 ± 340 | 27.6% | −29% (***) | |
| 50 ± 22 | 1.9% | 39 ± 17 | 1.7% | +27% (***) | |
| Myxomycetes | 41 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| 39 ± 16 | 1.5% | 25 ± 11 | 1.1% | +57% (***) | |
| 36 ± 17 | 1.3% | 505 ± 655 | 21.3% | −93% (***) | |
| 36 | 1.3% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a | |
| Ascospores | 30 ± 17 | 1.1% | 41 ± 32 | 1.7% | −28% (***) |
| 29 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a | |
| 25 ± 12 | 0.9% | 23 ± 11 | 1.0% | +6% (ns) | |
| 6 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a | |
| 5 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a | |
| 2 | 0.1% | 7 | 0.3% | −46% | |
| Other species | 51 | 2.0% | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| 100.0% | 100% | + | |||
Contributions (%) to the total spore amount are given per taxon (in descending order for the aircraft records), along with differences between sampling means (in parenthesis results from one-way, weighted-moments ANOVA is given, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, ns: not significant relationship).
Statistical analysis was performed for those taxa whose fungal spores contributed more than 0.5% to the total spore concentration, respectively, for both car and aircraft sampling.
Factorial Regression results of fungal spore concentrations (m−3 of air) for 7 taxa, against habitat type (urban environment, semi-urban and natural ecosystem), elevation (0–2000 m) and their interaction effect.
| Fungal taxon | Partial correlations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat type (1) | Elevation (2) | (1)*(2) | |||
| 0.001 | 0.07 | +0.09 | ns | −0.04 | |
| Ascospores | 0.001 | 0.06 | +0.11 | +0.06 | −0.11 |
| 0.001 | 0.05 | +0.14 | +0.06 | −0.06 | |
| 0.001 | 0.01 | +0.03 | ns | ns | |
| 0.001 | 0.02 | ns | +0.07 | −0.05 | |
| 0.001 | 0.03 | +0.11 | +0.04 | −0.05 | |
| 0.001 | 0.07 | −0.20 | −0.23 | +0.20 | |
Partial correlation coefficients, p and R2 are given.
For partial correlations, “+” indicates a positive correlation, “−” a negative correlation; “ns” indicates a non-significant relationship (p > 0.05).
Figure 2Factorial regression plots of airborne fungal spore concentrations per cubic metre of air (dependent variable) for 7 taxa (Fig. 2(a–g)), against habitat type (urban environment, semi-urban and natural ecosystem) and elevation (0–2000 m).
Habitat codes: 1: urban environment, 2: semi-urban environment, 3: natural environment. Elevation codes: 1: lower than 300 m, 2: 301–600 m, 3: 601–900 m, 4: 901–1200 m, 5: 1201–1500 m, 6: higher than 1500 m. Spline fitting has been applied in all cases (curve stiffness equals to 0.5).