Literature DB >> 28299529

Modeling and simulation in dose determination for biodefense products approved under the FDA animal rule.

Kimberly L Bergman1, K Krudys2, S K Seo2, J Florian2.   

Abstract

Development of effective medical countermeasures for biodefense is vital to United States biopreparedness and response in the age of terrorism, both foreign and domestic. A traditional drug development pathway toward approval is not possible for most biodefense-related indications, creating the need for alternative development pathways such as the FDA's Animal Rule. Under this unique regulatory mechanism, FDA-approval is based on adequate and well-controlled animal studies when it is neither ethical nor feasible to conduct human efficacy studies. Translation of animal efficacy findings to humans is accomplished by use of modeling and simulation techniques. Pharmacokinetic and exposure-response modeling allow effective dosing regimens in humans to be identified, which are expected to produce similar benefit to that observed in animal models of disease. In this review, the role of modeling and simulation in determining the human dose for biodefense products developed under the Food and Drug Administration's Animal Rule regulatory pathway is discussed, and case studies illustrating the utility of modeling and simulation in this area of development are presented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal Rule; Anthrax; Infectious diseases; Modeling; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Regulatory; Simulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28299529     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-017-9516-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.410


  11 in total

1.  Update: investigation of bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax--Connecticut, 2001.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 2.  The animal rule and emerging infections: the role of clinical pharmacology in determining an effective dose.

Authors:  K L Bergman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Pharmacokinetic considerations and efficacy of levofloxacin in an inhalational anthrax (postexposure) rhesus monkey model.

Authors:  L Mark Kao; Karen Bush; Roy Barnewall; James Estep; Frederic W Thalacker; Pamela H Olson; George L Drusano; Neil Minton; Shuchean Chien; Alex Hemeryck; Michael F Kelley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Amoxicillin pharmacokinetics in pregnant women: modeling and simulations of dosage strategies.

Authors:  M A Andrew; T R Easterling; D B Carr; D Shen; M L Buchanan; T Rutherford; R Bennett; P Vicini; M F Hebert
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  New drug and biological drug products; evidence needed to demonstrate effectiveness of new drugs when human efficacy studies are not ethical or feasible. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2002-05-31

6.  The animal rule: The role of clinical pharmacology in determining an effective dose in humans.

Authors:  K L Bergman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Clinical Framework and Medical Countermeasure Use During an Anthrax Mass-Casualty Incident.

Authors:  William A Bower; Katherine Hendricks; Satish Pillai; Julie Guarnizo; Dana Meaney-Delman
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2015-12-04

8.  Bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax: the first 10 cases reported in the United States.

Authors:  J A Jernigan; D S Stephens; D A Ashford; C Omenaca; M S Topiel; M Galbraith; M Tapper; T L Fisk; S Zaki; T Popovic; R F Meyer; C P Quinn; S A Harper; S K Fridkin; J J Sejvar; C W Shepard; M McConnell; J Guarner; W J Shieh; J M Malecki; J L Gerberding; J M Hughes; B A Perkins
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Centers for disease control and prevention expert panel meetings on prevention and treatment of anthrax in adults.

Authors:  Katherine A Hendricks; Mary E Wright; Sean V Shadomy; John S Bradley; Meredith G Morrow; Andy T Pavia; Ethan Rubinstein; Jon-Erik C Holty; Nancy E Messonnier; Theresa L Smith; Nicki Pesik; Tracee A Treadwell; William A Bower
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax, United States, 2001: epidemiologic findings.

Authors:  Daniel B Jernigan; Pratima L Raghunathan; Beth P Bell; Ross Brechner; Eddy A Bresnitz; Jay C Butler; Marty Cetron; Mitch Cohen; Timothy Doyle; Marc Fischer; Carolyn Greene; Kevin S Griffith; Jeannette Guarner; James L Hadler; James A Hayslett; Richard Meyer; Lyle R Petersen; Michael Phillips; Robert Pinner; Tanja Popovic; Conrad P Quinn; Jennita Reefhuis; Dori Reissman; Nancy Rosenstein; Anne Schuchat; Wun-Ju Shieh; Larry Siegal; David L Swerdlow; Fred C Tenover; Marc Traeger; John W Ward; Isaac Weisfuse; Steven Wiersma; Kevin Yeskey; Sherif Zaki; David A Ashford; Bradley A Perkins; Steve Ostroff; James Hughes; David Fleming; Jeffrey P Koplan; Julie L Gerberding
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Model-Informed Drug Development for Anti-Infectives: State of the Art and Future.

Authors:  Craig R Rayner; Patrick F Smith; David Andes; Kayla Andrews; Hartmut Derendorf; Lena E Friberg; Debra Hanna; Alex Lepak; Edward Mills; Thomas M Polasek; Jason A Roberts; Virna Schuck; Mark J Shelton; David Wesche; Karen Rowland-Yeo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Dose Selection in a Pandemic: A Framework Informed by the FDA Animal Rule.

Authors:  Kunyi Wu; Kimberly L Bergman
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.438

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.