| Literature DB >> 28298892 |
Caitlin Ware1, Souad Damnee2, Leila Djabelkhir3, Victoria Cristancho3, Ya-Huei Wu3, Judith Benovici4, Maribel Pino3, Anne-Sophie Rigaud3.
Abstract
Researchers have hypothesized that learning a foreign language could be beneficial for seniors, as language learning requires the use of extensive neural networks. We developed and qualitatively evaluated an English training program for older French adults; our principal objective was to determine whether a program integrating technology is feasible for this population. We conducted a 4-month pilot study (16, 2-h sessions) with 14 French participants, (nine women, five men, average age 75). Questionnaires were administered pre- and post-intervention to measure cognitive level and subjective feelings of loneliness or social isolation; however, these scores did not improve significantly. Post-intervention, semi-directive interviews were carried out with participants, and a content/theme analysis was performed. Five main themes were identified from the interviews: Associations with school, attitudes toward English, motivation for learning English, attitudes toward the program's organization, and social ties. The program was found to be feasible for this age group, yet perceived as quite difficult for participants who lacked experience with English. Nonetheless, most participants found the program to be stimulating and enjoyable. We discuss different suggestions for future programs and future directions for foreign-language learning as a therapeutic and cognitive intervention.Entities:
Keywords: cognitive plasticity; cognitive reserve; foreign language learning; older adults; technology
Year: 2017 PMID: 28298892 PMCID: PMC5331045 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Participant demographics.
| Characteristics | Participants ( |
|---|---|
| Age | 75.42 (±8.93) |
| Mini/Maxi | 63/90 |
| Male/Female | 5/9 |
| Education | 5.1 (±1.4) |
| Beginner English level | 5 |
| Intermediate English level | 5 |
| Advanced English level | 4 |
| MOCA | 26 (±2.67) |
Themes of the sessions.
| Lesson 1: Meeting for the first time | Lesson 9: Blind date |
| Lesson 2: Making breakfast | Lesson 10: Getting ready to go out |
| Lesson 3: Gardening | Lesson 11: Antiques and bargaining |
| Lesson 4: Dinner with colleagues | Lesson 12: Sleeping and waking up |
| Lesson 5: Shopping for clothes | Lesson 13: Getting hurt |
| Lesson 6: Taking care of pets | Lesson 14: Expressing nostalgia |
| Lesson 7: Expressing love | Lesson 15: Leaving for a trip |
| Lesson 8: Jealousy and trust | Lesson 16: Newspaper and learning websites |
Pre–post intervention results.
| Scale | Pre | Post | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOCA | 26.46 | 26.77 | 0.67 |
| UCLA | 39.15 | 40.83 | 0.15 |
Main themes and subthemes.
| Main themes | Subthemes and number of participants concerned |
|---|---|
| Associations with school | - School memories (10) |
| Attitudes toward English | - Learning English is fun (7) |
| Motivation for learning English | - Connecting with family (3) |
| Attitudes toward the program’s organization | - Different English levels are challenging (9) |
| Social ties | - Absence of bonding (10) |