Roshni Jaiswal1, Nina Shenoy1, Biju Thomas1. 1. Department of Periodontics, A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stress classically describes a destructive notion that can have a bearing on one's physical and mental health. It may also add to an increased propensity to periodontal disease. AIM: To investigate the association between psychological stress and serum cortisol levels in patients with chronic periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty subjects were recruited from the outpatient department at the Department of Periodontics, from a college in Mangalore, divided into two groups, i.e., twenty as healthy controls and twenty were stressed subjects with chronic periodontitis. The clinical examination included the assessment of probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level and oral hygiene index-simplified. Serum cortisol levels were estimated biochemically using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method and the estimation of psychological stress was done by a questionnaire. RESULTS: Descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation was used to review the collected data. Independent sample t-test was used for comparison and correlation was evaluation using Pearson's correlation test. As per our observation, high serum cortisol levels and psychological stress are positively linked with chronic periodontitis establishing a risk profile showing a significant correlation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Routine serum cortisol assessment may be a reasonable and a valuable investigative indicator to rule out stress in periodontitis patients as it should be considered as an imperative risk factor for periodontal disease.
BACKGROUND:Stress classically describes a destructive notion that can have a bearing on one's physical and mental health. It may also add to an increased propensity to periodontal disease. AIM: To investigate the association between psychological stress and serum cortisol levels in patients with chronic periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty subjects were recruited from the outpatient department at the Department of Periodontics, from a college in Mangalore, divided into two groups, i.e., twenty as healthy controls and twenty were stressed subjects with chronic periodontitis. The clinical examination included the assessment of probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level and oral hygiene index-simplified. Serum cortisol levels were estimated biochemically using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method and the estimation of psychological stress was done by a questionnaire. RESULTS: Descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation was used to review the collected data. Independent sample t-test was used for comparison and correlation was evaluation using Pearson's correlation test. As per our observation, high serum cortisol levels and psychological stress are positively linked with chronic periodontitis establishing a risk profile showing a significant correlation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Routine serum cortisol assessment may be a reasonable and a valuable investigative indicator to rule out stress in periodontitispatients as it should be considered as an imperative risk factor for periodontal disease.
Chronic periodontitis is an infectious disease caused by Gram-negative bacteria which leads to the inflammation of the tissues supporting the teeth, continous attachment loss, and bone loss.[1] It is usually considered to be a gradually progressing disease. Although with the existence of systemic or environmental factors that may alter the host response to plaque build-ups, such as diabetes, smoking or stress, disease development may become more violent.Periodontal disease is multifactorial with multifarious relations between bacteria and host responses which is often customized by behavioral factors. Stress is also a contributing feature in periodontal disease. Moreover, the word stress has an accurate physiological definition, i.e., it is a state of physiological and psychological strain caused by an adverse stimuli, physical, mental or emotional, internal or external that tends to perturb the functioning of an organism and which an organism naturally tries to circumvent. Thus, “stress” can be described as a process with both physiological and psychological components.[2]The role of stress in periodontitis has a conceivable pathological concept. This is because stress can cause behavior variation and increase at-risk behaviors such as smoking, alcohol abuse, and improper oral hygiene due to reduced compliance with dental care as well as some immunosuppressive effects.[3]Cellular immune response is downregulated by psychological stress in three different ways:The hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis[4]The peripheral release of neuropeptidesThe sympathetic nervous system via the release of adrenaline and noradrenaline.[3]Cortisol is a steroid hormone produced by the adrenal gland. It is the key hormone in stress and fight or flight response. It is a well-established stress biomarker and is controlled by adrenocorticotropic hormone from the pituitary gland. Its levels can be affected by physical stress, emotional stress, and illness.[1] In case of high level of stress, serum cortisol value is bound to increase, thus it is a reliable indicator in patients undergoing stressful events in life.With this background, the goal of this study was to assess and compare the association between psychological stress and serum cortisol levels of healthy individuals and patients with chronic periodontitis.
Objectives of the study
The objectives of this study were:To estimate serum cortisol levels of healthy individualsTo estimate serum cortisol levels and oral hygiene status of stressed subjects with chronic periodontitisTo compare and correlate the association between psychological stress and serum cortisol levels of healthy individuals and patients with chronic periodontitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Forty subjects were recruited from the routine outpatient department at the Department of Periodontics, Mangalore. The nature and rationale of the study was explained to all the participants, and consent was obtained for the same. The study group was divided into two groups:Group I – Twenty subjects with healthy periodontiumGroup II – Twenty stressed subjects with chronic periodontitis.
Method of collection of data
The sample size was calculated with expected parameter (cortisol levels) estimate based on minimum 20% ratio of differences between control and test group. The minimum sample size thus required was required to be approximately forty within a 95% confidence and power of 80% with level of significance as P > 0.05.Sample size was calculated using the following formula:α – Level of significance; Sp2 – Pooled variance; 1 – β – Power; μd – Clinical significant difference.
Criteria for selection
Inclusion criteria
Both male and female subjects within the age group of 25–50 yearsSubjects with a minimum complement of twenty teethSystemically healthy subjectsSubjects with healthy periodontium (Group I), i.e., no attachment loss and probing depth (PD) of (<3 mm)Subjects diagnosed with chronic periodontitis (Group II) as per International Workshop for Classification of Periodontal Diseases and Conditions,[5] i.e., the involvement of (>30% sites) with moderate to severe clinical attachment loss (CAL) (>3 mm) was measured with William's periodontal probeSubjects who have scored twenty points or higher (Group II) on the Perceived Stress Scale by Cohen et al.,[6] as this score indicates high stress in a subject.
Exclusion criteria
Patients on corticosteroid therapyPatients on immunosuppressive drugsPatients who are under antibiotic treatment and have undergone periodontal treatment 6 months before examinationTrauma or bleeding in the oral cavity not related to periodontitisPregnancy or lactationPatients on tranquilizers, sedatives, and antidepressantsPatients who smoke and consume alcohol.
Screening examination
Patients were asked about the basic demographic details including age, family history of periodontal disease, smoking, and frequency of brushing and flossing were recorded. Participants also indicated if they ignore oral hygiene during the periods of stress or depressionEvaluation of stress by the subject on five-point scale was recorded, and stress level was evaluated for each patient using Perceived Stress Scale by Cohen et al. 1983.[6]
Clinical procedure: Periodontal parameters
Mean probing pocket depth: The pocket depth was measured using Williams's graduated periodontal probe at six sites, i.e., distobuccal, midbuccal, mesiobuccal, distolingual, midlingual, and mesiolingual of each tooth. All six measurements were added and divided by the number of sites examined, i.e., six to obtain the mean PD for an individual toothMean clinical attachment level: Clinical attachment level was measured on six surfaces per tooth, i.e., distobuccal, midbuccal, mesiobuccal, distolingual, midlingual, and mesiolingualOral hygiene index-simplified (OHI-S)[7] was recorded for each subject.
Method of collection of sample
Collection of blood sample: About 3–5 ml of blood was collected by venipuncture, from the median cubital vein between 9 and 11 am from the subjects after 20 min of rest to the subjectEstimation of cortisol in serum: Blood was centrifuged and then, serum cortisol level was evaluated using Cortisol ELISA Kit.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation was utilized to condense the collected data.Independent sample t-test was used to compare the difference in mean of OHI-S and serum cortisol levels between Group I and II [Table 1].
Table 1
Results of independent sample t-test
Results of independent sample t-testTo study the correlation between serum cortisol levels and PD, CAL, Pearson's correlation coefficient was obtained (R value) [Table 2].
Table 2
Correlation between serum cortisol level and periodontal parameters
Correlation between serum cortisol level and periodontal parametersIf P < 0.05, then it was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
The study included forty subjects divided into two groups, Group I constituted healthy individuals, whereas Group II included stressed subjects with chronic periodontitis.OHI-S and serum cortisol levels of all these subjects were calculated which were compared using independent sample t-test. Results are described in [Table 1].
DISCUSSION
Investigations promoting the recognition of risk factors are acquiring essence for management and prevention for periodontitis as it is a multifactorial disease. It is recommended that stress, depression, and unsuccessful coping may add to the progression of periodontitis.[8]The periodontal breakdown is promoted, as persistent stress may tend to have a total destructive effect on the immunological response of body leading to an disparity between host response and pathogens.[9]Numerous clinical studies have investigated the probable relationship between psychological stress and periodontitis and have recommended that stress may play a role in the advancement of periodontal disease.[10111213]The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between psychological stress and serum cortisol levels in patients with chronic periodontitis.The results of this study specify increased mean serum cortisol levels in Group II as compared to Group I [Graph 1 and Table 1]. This indicates that serum cortisol is increased in stressed individuals with chronic periodontitis. These results are in agreement with other similar studies where a noteworthy correlation was found between psychological stress, serum cortisol levels, and periodontal clinical parameters.[141516] This can be explained as stress-induced response transfers to the HPA axis and promotes the release of corticotropin-releasing hormone from the pituitary gland and glucocorticoid hormones from the adrenal cortex.[17] When cortisol is released into the circulation, it leads to unsolicited effects throughout the body such as modification of certain growth factor levels, elevation of blood glucose levels, and containment of the inflammatory response.[18] Table 3 depicts mean probing depth and clinical attachment loss in Group II subjects.
Graph 1
Comparison of mean serum cortisol level in health and periodontitis group
Table 3
Mean probing depth and clinical attachment loss (mm) (Group II)
Comparison of mean serum cortisol level in health and periodontitis groupMean probing depth and clinical attachment loss (mm) (Group II)In the inter-group comparison, assessing the correlation between serum cortisol level and periodontal parameters, i.e. CAL and PD [Table 2], there was a statistically significant (P < 0.05) and positive correlation between psychological stress and patients suffering from chronic periodontitis. This can be explained by the biologic model suggesting that increased level of steroids results in decreased resistance to infection by suppressing IgA, causing immunosuppression due to which initial colonization of periodontal pathogens is favored thereby leading to an increase in the severity of disease.[19]Furthermore, on comparing the mean oral hygiene score of Group I with II [Graph 2 and Table 1], there was a noteworthy difference between the two, indicating that Group II patients had poor oral hygiene status (depicted in Graph 3). This is in accordance with the behavioral model signifying that psychosocial stress may impact behavioral changes affecting health behaviors (i.e. smoking, poor compliance, and poor oral hygiene). Moreover, stress leads to overeating, especially high fat diets which increase cortisol release.[19] These results are in accordance with other similar studies where it was affirmed that psychosocial stress may induce neglect from oral hygiene and also severe attachment loss and increased PD.[820212223] Contrasting views have been reported in other studies by Monteiro da Silva et al., Castro et al., Solis et al., where no correlation was found between stress and established periodontitis.[242526]
Graph 2
Comparison of oral hygiene index-simplified score
Graph 3
Mean probing depth and clinical attachment loss in Group II
Comparison of oral hygiene index-simplified scoreMean probing depth and clinical attachment loss in Group IIWithin the scope of this study, it can be concluded that high serum cortisol levels and psychological stress are positively associated with chronic periodontitis establishing a risk profile.
Limitations
Stress among the women population was not satisfactorily determined as this study had few female participants.Other manifestations such as recurrent aphthous ulcers, bruxism, lichen planus, oral submucous fibrosis, and deleterious habits such as smoking and tobacco chewing can also be linked with stress along with periodontal disease, but such patients were barred from the study.Lastly, this study included subjects only from low socio-economic background, hence there could be a reasonable likelihood of bias.
CONCLUSION
It can be concluded that there is an affirmative relation between stress, serum cortisol, and chronic periodontitis within the precincts of this study. Hence, for evaluating the risk of chronic periodontitis, assessing patients for stress is an essential factor. However, further research is needed including larger sample size and taking other factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and financial strain into consideration to verify the impact of stress on periodontal disease.
Financial support and sponsorship
Financial assistance for this study was provided by NITTE University, Mangalore.
Authors: A T T Leão; L Vieira Neto; M O Rodrigues; A B Moraes; M P de Paula; V A Pereira Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 4.256