Gustavo de Souza Portes Meirelles1, Julia Capobianco2, Marco Antônio Condé de Oliveira3. 1. MD, PhD, Postdoctoral work in PET/CT, Medical Coordinator of the Grupo Fleury, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 2. MD, Specialist in PET/CT, Radiologist for the Grupo Fleury, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 3. Nuclear Medicine Physician for the Grupo Fleury, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Abstract
PET/CT is widely used for the evaluation of patients with thoracic malignancies. Although the levels of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake are usually high in neoplastic diseases, they can also be physiological, due to artifacts. In addition, FDG uptake can occur in benign conditions such as infectious, inflammatory, and iatrogenic lesions. Furthermore, some malignant tumors, such as adenocarcinoma in situ (formerly known as bronchoalveolar carcinoma) and carcinoid tumors, may not show FDG uptake. Here, we illustrate the main pitfalls and artifacts in the interpretation of the results of oncologic PET/CT of the chest, outlining strategies for avoiding misinterpretation.
PET/CT is widely used for the evaluation of patients with thoracic malignancies. Although the levels of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake are usually high in neoplastic diseases, they can also be physiological, due to artifacts. In addition, FDG uptake can occur in benign conditions such as infectious, inflammatory, and iatrogenic lesions. Furthermore, some malignant tumors, such as adenocarcinoma in situ (formerly known as bronchoalveolar carcinoma) and carcinoid tumors, may not show FDG uptake. Here, we illustrate the main pitfalls and artifacts in the interpretation of the results of oncologic PET/CT of the chest, outlining strategies for avoiding misinterpretation.
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging has been the
subject of a series of recent publications in the radiology literature in
Brazil(. PET/CT is an integral part of the management of
patients with thoracic neoplasms, improving staging, monitoring of therapy, and
prognostic assessment. However, many artifacts and pitfalls can be seen on the
examination, such as normal variants, physiological areas of
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake, acquisition or reconstruction
artifacts, and false-positive or false-negative results.The purpose of this essay was to describe and illustrate the main pitfalls and
artifacts in the interpretation of oncologic PET/CT examinations of the chest and to
present strategies for avoiding their ‘misinterpretation.
PHYSIOLOGICAL FDG UPTAKE
FDG uptake in PET/CT can be seen in active tissues with high glucose metabolism. High
physiological uptake of FDG typically occurs in the brain, lymphoid tissue, liver,
spleen, kidneys, and urinary tract(. In the thorax, normal metabolic activity can be seen in the
myocardium(, great
vessels, esophagus, thymus, breast (especially of lactating females), bone marrow,
muscles, and brown fat (Figure 1)(.
Figure 1
Causes of physiological FDG uptake in the thorax.
A: A 6-year-old boy, with normal metabolic activity in the
thymus. The strategy for differentiating between focal uptake in the
anterior mediastinum and a lesion is to look at the normal aspect of the
thymus on CT images. B: A 56-year-old man with lung cancer
and a forceful cough during the PET/CT examination. FDG PET/CT shows
increased metabolic activity in the thoracic muscles, due to vigorous
coughing. C: A 31-year-old lactating woman, with normal FDG
uptake in the breast. Lactation induces higher metabolic activity in the
breasts, which should not be interpreted as disease. D: A
28-year-old man with testicular cancer. Multiple areas of FDG uptake in
the supraclavicular regions and in the upper mediastinum, consistent
with increased metabolic activity in brown fat, which regulates body
weight and temperature and can be activated by satiety or cold
environments.
Causes of physiological FDG uptake in the thorax.
A: A 6-year-old boy, with normal metabolic activity in the
thymus. The strategy for differentiating between focal uptake in the
anterior mediastinum and a lesion is to look at the normal aspect of the
thymus on CT images. B: A 56-year-old man with lung cancer
and a forceful cough during the PET/CT examination. FDG PET/CT shows
increased metabolic activity in the thoracic muscles, due to vigorous
coughing. C: A 31-year-old lactating woman, with normal FDG
uptake in the breast. Lactation induces higher metabolic activity in the
breasts, which should not be interpreted as disease. D: A
28-year-old man with testicular cancer. Multiple areas of FDG uptake in
the supraclavicular regions and in the upper mediastinum, consistent
with increased metabolic activity in brown fat, which regulates body
weight and temperature and can be activated by satiety or cold
environments.
FALSE-POSITIVE FDG UPTAKE
False-positive FDG uptake can occur in infections, inflammatory lesions, benign
tumors, and iatrogenic conditions such as surgical manipulation, pleurodesis,
radiation therapy, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor administration, as well
as after chemotherapy (Figures 2-10)(.
Figure 2
A 57-year-old female with cough, fever, and multiple centrilobular
pulmonary nodules in the superior segment of the left lower lobe
(arrows). PET/CT was performed and showed increased FDG uptake (arrow)
in the lung nodules. A CT-guided pulmonary biopsy confirmed the
diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.
Figure 10
A 41-year-old woman with a history of Hodgkin lymphoma and
paramediastinal opacities with FDG uptake (arrows), consistent with
inflammatory lesions induced by radiation therapy.
A 57-year-old female with cough, fever, and multiple centrilobular
pulmonary nodules in the superior segment of the left lower lobe
(arrows). PET/CT was performed and showed increased FDG uptake (arrow)
in the lung nodules. A CT-guided pulmonary biopsy confirmed the
diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.A 57-year-old man, current smoker, with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and a
spiculated pulmonary nodule (arrows) in the left upper lobe, with high
FDG uptake. Surgical resection confirmed the diagnosis of pulmonary
cryptococcosis.A 74-year-old man with esophageal cancer and multiple areas of
ground-glass opacities with FDG uptake in the right lung, consistent
with bacterial pneumonia.A 42-year-old man with a lobulated pulmonary nodule in the right lower
lobe (arrows), indeterminate on CT. PET/CT was performed and showed
increased metabolic activity (arrow) in the lung nodule, which was
surgically resected and was found to be consistent with pulmonary
meningioma.A 81-year-old man with an occupational history of asbestos exposure.
PET/CT images demonstrate high metabolic activity in the left lower
lobes, especially in the cortical regions. CT images depict interstitial
lung abnormalities, with ground-glass opacities, reticulation, and mild
bronchiolectasis.A 78-year-old woman submitted to PET/CT for the staging of a cervical
carcinoma, with increased FDG uptake in bilateral subscapular masses
(arrows), consistent with elastofibroma dorsi.Postoperative PET/CT of a patient with history of cardiac tumor. Note the
diffuse FDG uptake in the sternum, consistent with inflammatory changes
induced by the surgical procedure (arrows). Also note the increased
metabolic activity in areas of brown fat in the supraclavicular and
paravertebral regions (dashed arrows).A 64-year-old woman submitted to PET/CT for the restaging of lung cancer.
Multiple foci of FDG uptake are seen in the right pleura (arrows),
consistent with an inflammatory process induced by pleurodesis. A
careful analysis of CT images demonstrates the high-attenuation pleural
thickening, characteristic of pleurodesis.A 41-year-old woman with a history of Hodgkin lymphoma and
paramediastinal opacities with FDG uptake (arrows), consistent with
inflammatory lesions induced by radiation therapy.
FALSE-NEGATIVE STUDIES
False-negative FDG uptake (Figure 11) can be
seen in adenocarcinomas in situ (formerly known as bronchoalveolar
carcinomas), carcinoid tumors(,
ground-glass nodules, and small lesions(.
Figure 11
A 63-year-old male, current smoker, with a ground-glass nodule in the
right lung (arrow), which had consistently increased in size over the
years. PET/CT was performed and was negative. Surgical resection
confirmed the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ
(formerly known as bronchoalveolar carcinoma). PET/CT is limited for
these conditions and should not be used for small nodules with
groundglass attenuation, due to the high pretest probability of
false-negative results.
A 63-year-old male, current smoker, with a ground-glass nodule in the
right lung (arrow), which had consistently increased in size over the
years. PET/CT was performed and was negative. Surgical resection
confirmed the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ
(formerly known as bronchoalveolar carcinoma). PET/CT is limited for
these conditions and should not be used for small nodules with
groundglass attenuation, due to the high pretest probability of
false-negative results.
ARTIFACTS
Artifacts (Figures 12 and 13) can be induced by PET attenuation correction,
misregistration related to free breathing, truncation, FDG extravasation, and FDG
embolism(.
Figure 12
A 57-year-old woman with breast cancer and focal FDG uptake in a left
axillary lymph node (arrow). That uptake is consistent with
extravasation of FDG in the left arm, draining to the ipsilateral
axillary region.
Figure 13
A 78-year-old man with a pacemaker in his left hemithorax (arrow). A PET
attenuation-corrected image shows FDG uptake in the left hemithorax,
consistent with an artifact induced by attenuation correction. In cases
of uncertainty, the non-attenuation-corrected image can be used in order
to avoid misinterpretation.
A 57-year-old woman with breast cancer and focal FDG uptake in a left
axillary lymph node (arrow). That uptake is consistent with
extravasation of FDG in the left arm, draining to the ipsilateral
axillary region.A 78-year-old man with a pacemaker in his left hemithorax (arrow). A PET
attenuation-corrected image shows FDG uptake in the left hemithorax,
consistent with an artifact induced by attenuation correction. In cases
of uncertainty, the non-attenuation-corrected image can be used in order
to avoid misinterpretation.
CONCLUSION
Awareness of normal FDG distribution, physiological FDG uptake, and their variants is
mandatory for interpreting oncologic PET/CT examinations of the chest.
False-positive and false-negative results can be avoided if the reader has knowledge
of their main aspects and interprets the CT and PET findings carefully. When these
points are well known by the radiologist, PET/CT is a powerful imaging technique for
characterizing pulmonary lesions, providing accurate staging for lung neoplasms and
contributing to better evaluation of the effectiveness of therapy and prognostic
assessment.