Literature DB >> 28298564

Proteomic Analysis of Sera from Individuals with Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Reveals a Multianalyte Signature Associated with Clinical Improvement during Imatinib Mesylate Treatment.

D James Haddon1,2, Hannah E Wand1,2, Justin A Jarrell1,2, Robert F Spiera1,2, Paul J Utz1,2, Jessica K Gordon1,2, Lorinda S Chung3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Imatinib has been investigated for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc) because of its ability to inhibit the platelet-derived growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor-β signaling pathways, which have been implicated in SSc pathogenesis. In a 12-month open-label clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of imatinib in the treatment of diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), significant improvements in skin thickening were observed. Here, we report our analysis of sera collected during the clinical trial.
METHODS: We measured the levels of 46 cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors in the sera of individuals with dcSSc using Luminex and ELISA. Autoantigen microarrays were used to measure immunoglobulin G reactivity to 28 autoantigens. Elastic net regularization was used to identify a signature that was predictive of clinical improvement (reduction in the modified Rodnan skin score ≥ 5) during treatment with imatinib. The signature was also tested using sera from a clinical trial of nilotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is structurally related to imatinib, in dcSSc.
RESULTS: The elastic net algorithm identified a signature, based on levels of CD40 ligand, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 4 (CXCL4), and anti-PM/Scl-100, that was significantly higher in individuals who experienced clinical improvement than in those who did not (p = 0.0011). The signature was validated using samples from a clinical trial of nilotinib.
CONCLUSION: Identification of patients with SSc with the greatest probability of benefit from treatment with imatinib has the potential to guide individualized treatment. Validation of the signature will require testing in randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00555581 and NCT01166139.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUTOANTIBODIES; DIFFUSE CUTANEOUS SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS; IMATINIB; NILOTINIB; PROTEIN MICROARRAYS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28298564      PMCID: PMC5860882          DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.160833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  32 in total

1.  Imatinib in active diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: Results of a six-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept pilot study at a single center.

Authors:  Janet Pope; Donna McBain; Lisa Petrlich; Sharon Watson; Louise Vanderhoek; Faye de Leon; Shannon Seney; Kelly Summers
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-11

2.  A one-year, phase I/IIa, open-label pilot trial of imatinib mesylate in the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated active interstitial lung disease.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Rajeev Saggar; Maureen D Mayes; Fereidoun Abtin; Philip J Clements; Paul Maranian; Shervin Assassi; Rajan Saggar; Ram R Singh; Daniel E Furst
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-11

Review 3.  Targeting tyrosine kinases: a novel therapeutic strategy for systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Jessica K Gordon; Robert F Spiera
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Imatinib mesylate in scleroderma-associated diffuse skin fibrosis: a phase II multicentre randomized double-blinded controlled trial.

Authors:  S Prey; K Ezzedine; A Doussau; A-S Grandoulier; D Barcat; E Chatelus; E Diot; C Durant; E Hachulla; J-D de Korwin-Krokowski; E Kostrzewa; T Quemeneur; C Paul; T Schaeverbeke; J Seneschal; A Solanilla; A Sparsa; S Bouchet; S Lepreux; F-X Mahon; G Chene; A Taïeb
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 9.302

5.  Minimally important difference in diffuse systemic sclerosis: results from the D-penicillamine study.

Authors:  D Khanna; D E Furst; R D Hays; G S Park; W K Wong; J R Seibold; M D Mayes; B White; F F Wigley; M Weisman; W Barr; L Moreland; T A Medsger; V D Steen; R W Martin; D Collier; A Weinstein; E V Lally; J Varga; S R Weiner; B Andrews; M Abeles; P J Clements
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Does C-reactive protein predict the long-term progression of interstitial lung disease and survival in patients with early systemic sclerosis?

Authors:  Xiaochun Liu; Maureen D Mayes; Claudia Pedroza; Hilda T Draeger; Emilio B Gonzalez; Brock E Harper; John D Reveille; Shervin Assassi
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 7.  Antibodies in scleroderma: direct pathogenicity and phenotypic associations.

Authors:  Lorinda Chung; Paul J Utz
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.592

8.  Multiplex immune serum biomarker profiling in sarcoidosis and systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  P Beirne; P Pantelidis; P Charles; A U Wells; D J Abraham; C P Denton; K I Welsh; P L Shah; R M du Bois; P Kelleher
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 16.671

9.  Risk factors for ANA positivity in healthy persons.

Authors:  Quan-Zhen Li; David R Karp; Jiexia Quan; Valerie K Branch; Jinchun Zhou; Yun Lian; Benjamin F Chong; Edward K Wakeland; Nancy J Olsen
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Antibodies against PM/Scl-75 and PM/Scl-100 are independent markers for different subsets of systemic sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Katharina Hanke; Claudia S Brückner; Cornelia Dähnrich; Dörte Huscher; Lars Komorowski; Wolfgang Meyer; Anthonia Janssen; Marina Backhaus; Mike Becker; Angela Kill; Karl Egerer; Gerd R Burmester; Falk Hiepe; Wolfgang Schlumberger; Gabriela Riemekasten
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Drugs in phase I and phase II clinical trials for systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Melody P Chung; Lorinda Chung
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 6.206

Review 2.  Unmet Needs in Systemic Sclerosis Understanding and Treatment: the Knowledge Gaps from a Scientist's, Clinician's, and Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Marta Cossu; Lorenzo Beretta; Petra Mosterman; Maria J H de Hair; Timothy R D J Radstake
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 3.  Targeting Costimulatory Pathways in Systemic Sclerosis.

Authors:  Gonçalo Boleto; Yannick Allanore; Jérôme Avouac
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 4.  Therapeutic Options for Systemic Sclerosis: Current and Future Perspectives in Tackling Immune-Mediated Fibrosis.

Authors:  Theodoros-Ioannis Papadimitriou; Arjan van Caam; Peter M van der Kraan; Rogier M Thurlings
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-01-29

Review 5.  Future Treatment Options in Systemic Sclerosis-Potential Targets and Ongoing Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Anna Bohdziewicz; Katarzyna Karina Pawlik; Magdalena Maciejewska; Mariusz Sikora; Rosanna Alda-Malicka; Joanna Czuwara; Lidia Rudnicka
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.