Literature DB >> 28298454

In Vitro Activity of Imipenem against Carbapenemase-Positive Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Collected by the SMART Global Surveillance Program from 2008 to 2014.

James A Karlowsky1, Sibylle H Lob2, Krystyna M Kazmierczak3, Robert E Badal3, Katherine Young4, Mary R Motyl4, Daniel F Sahm3.   

Abstract

The Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) global surveillance program collected 103,960 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from 2008 to 2014. From this isolate collection, all ertapenem-nonsusceptible isolates (MIC, ≥1 μg/ml; n = 3,428) and 9,371 isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, and Proteus mirabilis with an ertapenem-susceptible extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive phenotype were assessed for the presence of common carbapenemase genes using a Check-MDR CT101 microarray (Check-Points, Wageningen, the Netherlands) and published multiplex PCR assays. Testing identified 1,493 isolates that harbored a carbapenemase gene (1,485 ertapenem-nonsusceptible isolates and 8 ertapenem-susceptible ESBL-positive isolates) and accounted for 1.4% (1,493/103,960) of all isolates of Enterobacteriaceae The most frequently identified carbapenemase genes were the KPC (n = 794), OXA-48-like (n = 300), and NDM (n = 290) genes. Carbapenemase genes were most frequently identified in Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 1,127), Escherichia coli (n = 149), and Enterobacter cloacae (n = 110). Among the carbapenemase-positive isolates, 66.7% (2/3), 37.0% (111/300), 20.0% (8/40), 3.3% (3/92), 2.3% (18/794), and 0% (0/290) of the isolates with genes for GES, OXA-48-like, IMP, VIM, KPC, and NDM, respectively, were susceptible to imipenem (MIC, ≤1 μg/ml). Isolates that tested as susceptible to imipenem were not uncommon among carbapenemase-positive isolates (9.4%, 141/1,493) and most frequently carried OXA-48-like enzymes (78.7%; 111/141); however, overall, these isolates remained rare (0.1%, 141/103,960). The practice of screening clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae that test as susceptible to carbapenems in vitro for the presence of carbapenemase genes remains controversial and requires further study.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SMART; carbapenemase; global; imipenem; surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28298454      PMCID: PMC5442520          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02316-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  28 in total

Review 1.  Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase, AmpC, and Carbapenemase issues.

Authors:  Kenneth S Thomson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K pneumoniae: A systematic review.

Authors:  Anaelís C Campos; James Albiero; Alessandra B Ecker; Cristina M Kuroda; Lívia E F Meirelles; Angelita Polato; Maria C B Tognim; Márcia A Wingeter; Jorge J V Teixeira
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Dissemination of NDM metallo-β-lactamase genes among clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae collected during the SMART global surveillance study from 2008 to 2012.

Authors:  D Biedenbach; S Bouchillon; M Hackel; D Hoban; K Kazmierczak; S Hawser; R Badal
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Temocillin and piperacillin/tazobactam resistance by disc diffusion as antimicrobial surrogate markers for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in geographical areas with a high prevalence of OXA-48 producers.

Authors:  Te-Din Huang; Laurent Poirel; Pierre Bogaerts; Catherine Berhin; Patrice Nordmann; Youri Glupczynski
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Trends in susceptibility of Escherichia coli from intra-abdominal infections to ertapenem and comparators in the United States according to data from the SMART program, 2009 to 2013.

Authors:  Sibylle H Lob; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; Robert E Badal; Meredith A Hackel; Samuel K Bouchillon; Douglas J Biedenbach; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  OXA-48-like carbapenemases: the phantom menace.

Authors:  Laurent Poirel; Anaïs Potron; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 7.  Carbapenemases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and other Enterobacteriaceae: an evolving crisis of global dimensions.

Authors:  L S Tzouvelekis; A Markogiannakis; M Psichogiou; P T Tassios; G L Daikos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 8.  The difficult-to-control spread of carbapenemase producers among Enterobacteriaceae worldwide.

Authors:  P Nordmann; L Poirel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 9.  Treating infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  L S Tzouvelekis; A Markogiannakis; E Piperaki; M Souli; G L Daikos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 10.  Antibiotic treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: systematic evaluation of the available evidence.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Panagiota Lourida; Panagiotis Poulikakos; Petros I Rafailidis; Giannoula S Tansarli
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  31 in total

1.  The Role of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Urinary Tract Infections: Current Concepts and Therapeutic Options.

Authors:  Payam Behzadi; Edit Urbán; Mária Matuz; Ria Benkő; Márió Gajdács
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  A Cost-Effective Method for Identifying Enterobacterales with OXA-181.

Authors:  Gisele Peirano; Yasufumi Matsumura; Diego Nobrega; Johann D D Pitout
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  The Immaculate Carbapenemase Study.

Authors:  Kenneth S Thomson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Clinical Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Latin American Countries: Results from the INFORM Global Surveillance Program, 2012 to 2015.

Authors:  James A Karlowsky; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; Samuel K Bouchillon; Boudewijn L M de Jonge; Gregory G Stone; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Past and Present Perspectives on β-Lactamases.

Authors:  Karen Bush
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Epidemiology of β-Lactamase-Producing Pathogens.

Authors:  Karen Bush; Patricia A Bradford
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  The Global Ascendency of OXA-48-Type Carbapenemases.

Authors:  Johann D D Pitout; Gisele Peirano; Marleen M Kock; Kathy-Anne Strydom; Yasufumi Matsumura
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 8.  NDM Metallo-β-Lactamases and Their Bacterial Producers in Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Wenjing Wu; Yu Feng; Guangmin Tang; Fu Qiao; Alan McNally; Zhiyong Zong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  In Vivo Efficacy of Relebactam (MK-7655) in Combination with Imipenem-Cilastatin in Murine Infection Models.

Authors:  Mary Ann Powles; Andrew Galgoci; Andrew Misura; Lawrence Colwell; Karen H Dingley; Wei Tang; Jin Wu; Timothy Blizzard; Mary Motyl; Katherine Young
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Treatment of Infections by OXA-48-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Adam Stewart; Patrick Harris; Andrew Henderson; David Paterson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.