Literature DB >> 2829755

Observations on the ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms.

R Achiron1, E Schejter, G Malinger, H Zakut.   

Abstract

In order to determine whether sonography could differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms a retrospective analysis of preoperative ultrasound examination was made. The ultrasound images were evaluated for internal consistency, presence of septae, presence of solid nodules, papillary projections and tumor borders. Evidence of ascites and omental involvement were also assessed. Our study showed that benign ovarian serous tumors had a similar appearance to low grade malignant serous tumors, and were undistinguishable from the borderline serous carcinoma. The poorly differentiated serous adenocarcinoma was characterized by the presence of thick papillary projections rather than echogenicity. However, benign or malignant mucinous tumors gave the same pattern. Loss of tumor wall definition, ascites and omental involvement may signal malignancy. The dermoid tumor had a characteristic sonographic appearance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2829755     DOI: 10.1007/BF00931316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  9 in total

1.  Diagnosis of gynecologic pelvic masses by gray scale ultrasonography: analysis of specificity and accuracy.

Authors:  T L Lawson; J N Albarelli
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Sonographic evaluation of pelvic masses: method of examination and role of sonography relative to other imaging modalities.

Authors:  A C Fleischer; J W Walsh; H W Jones; M I Shaff; A E James
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Distinction of benign from malignant ovarian cysts by ultrasound.

Authors:  H B Meire; P Farrant; T Guha
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1978-12

4.  Dermoid cysts of the ovary: their ultrasonographic appearances.

Authors:  F C Laing; V F Van Dalsem; W M Marks; J L Barton; D A Martinez
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Ultrasonographic versus clinical evaluation of a pelvic mass.

Authors:  R D Reeves; T S Drake; W F O'Brien
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Use of diagnostic ultrasound in trophoblastic neoplasms and ovarian tumors.

Authors:  M Kobayashi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Sonography of ovarian tumors: predictability of tumor type.

Authors:  J W Moyle; D Rochester; L Sider; K Shrock; P Krause
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Evaluation of sonography in the initial assessment of the gynecologic patient.

Authors:  W F O'Brien; D R Buck; J D Nash
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Preoperative sonography of malignant ovarian neoplasms.

Authors:  C K Requard; F A Mettler; J D Wicks
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.959

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.