Romain Silhol1, Simon Gregson, Constance Nyamukapa, Mutsa Mhangara, Janet Dzangare, Elizabeth Gonese, Jeffrey W Eaton, Kelsey K Case, Mary Mahy, John Stover, Owen Mugurungi. 1. aDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK bBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe cAIDS and TB Unit, Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare, Harare, Zimbabwe dDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Harare, Zimbabwe eProgramme Branch, UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland fAvenir Health, Glastonbury, Connecticut, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: More cost-effective HIV control may be achieved by targeting geographical areas with high infection rates. The AIDS Impact model of Spectrum - used routinely to produce national HIV estimates - could provide the required subnational estimates but is rarely validated with empirical data, even at a national level. DESIGN: The validity of the Spectrum model estimates were compared with empirical estimates. METHODS: Antenatal surveillance and population survey data from a population HIV cohort study in Manicaland, East Zimbabwe, were input into Spectrum 5.441 to create a simulation representative of the cohort population. Model and empirical estimates were compared for key demographic and epidemiological outcomes. Alternative scenarios for data availability were examined and sensitivity analyses were conducted for model assumptions considered important for subnational estimates. RESULTS: Spectrum estimates generally agreed with observed data but HIV incidence estimates were higher than empirical estimates, whereas estimates of early age all-cause adult mortality were lower. Child HIV prevalence estimates matched well with the survey prevalence among children. Estimated paternal orphanhood was lower than empirical estimates. Including observations from earlier in the epidemic did not improve the HIV incidence model fit. Migration had little effect on observed discrepancies - possibly because the model ignores differences in HIV prevalence between migrants and residents. CONCLUSION: The Spectrum model, using subnational surveillance and population data, provided reasonable subnational estimates although some discrepancies were noted. Differences in HIV prevalence between migrants and residents may need to be captured in the model if applied to subnational epidemics.
BACKGROUND: More cost-effective HIV control may be achieved by targeting geographical areas with high infection rates. The AIDS Impact model of Spectrum - used routinely to produce national HIV estimates - could provide the required subnational estimates but is rarely validated with empirical data, even at a national level. DESIGN: The validity of the Spectrum model estimates were compared with empirical estimates. METHODS: Antenatal surveillance and population survey data from a population HIV cohort study in Manicaland, East Zimbabwe, were input into Spectrum 5.441 to create a simulation representative of the cohort population. Model and empirical estimates were compared for key demographic and epidemiological outcomes. Alternative scenarios for data availability were examined and sensitivity analyses were conducted for model assumptions considered important for subnational estimates. RESULTS: Spectrum estimates generally agreed with observed data but HIV incidence estimates were higher than empirical estimates, whereas estimates of early age all-cause adult mortality were lower. Child HIV prevalence estimates matched well with the survey prevalence among children. Estimated paternal orphanhood was lower than empirical estimates. Including observations from earlier in the epidemic did not improve the HIV incidence model fit. Migration had little effect on observed discrepancies - possibly because the model ignores differences in HIV prevalence between migrants and residents. CONCLUSION: The Spectrum model, using subnational surveillance and population data, provided reasonable subnational estimates although some discrepancies were noted. Differences in HIV prevalence between migrants and residents may need to be captured in the model if applied to subnational epidemics.
Authors: Y Caro-Vega; P F Belaunzarán-Zamudio; B Crabtree-Ramírez; B E Shepherd; F Mejia; M J Giganti; P Patterson; B Grinsztejn; M Wolff; J W Pape; D Padgett; J L Castilho; C McGowan; J G Sierra-Madero Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Joseph Kibachio; Valerian Mwenda; Oren Ombiro; Jamima H Kamano; Pablo N Perez-Guzman; Kennedy K Mutai; Idris Guessous; David Beran; Paratsu Kasaie; Brian Weir; Blythe Beecroft; Nduku Kilonzo; Linda Kupfer; Mikaela Smit Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Mary Mahy; Martina Penazzato; Andrea Ciaranello; Lynne Mofenson; Constantin T Yianoutsos; Mary-Ann Davies; John Stover Journal: AIDS Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 4.177