Idania Valdez-Vazquez1, Ana L Morales1, Ana E Escalante2. 1. Unidad Académica Juriquilla, Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Blvd. Juriquilla 3001, C.P 76230, Querétaro, Qro., Mexico. 2. Laboratorio Nacional de Ciencias de la Sostenibilidad, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, Mexico City, D.F, Mexico.
Abstract
This study addresses the question of ecological interest for the determination of structure and diversity of microbial communities that degrade lignocellulosic biomasses to produce biofuels. Two microbial consortia with different history, native of wheat straw (NWS) and from a methanogenic digester (MD) fed with cow manure, were contrasted in terms of hydrogen performance, substrate disintegration and microbial diversity. NWS outperformed the hydrogen production rate of MD. Microscopic images revealed that NWS acted on the cuticle and epidermis, generating cellulose strands with high crystallinity, while MD degraded deeper layers, equally affecting all polysaccharides. The bacterial composition markedly differed according to the inocula origin. NWS almost solely comprised hydrogen producers of the phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, with 38% members of Enterococcus. After hydrogen fermentation, NWS comprised 8% Syntrophococcus, an acetogen that cleaves aryl ethers of constituent groups on the aromatic components of lignin. Conversely, MD comprised thirteen phyla, primarily including Firmicutes with H2 -producing members, and Bacteroidetes with non-H2 -producing members, which reduced the hydrogen performance. Overall, the results of this study provide clear evidence that the history of adaptation of NWS enhanced the hydrogen performance from untreated wheat straw. Further, native wheat straw communities have the potential to refine cellulose fibers and produce biofuels simultaneously.
This study addresses the question of ecological interest for the determination of structure and diversity of microbial communities that degrade lignocellulosic biomasses to produce biofuels. Two microbial consortia with different history, native of wheatstraw (NWS) and from a methanogenic digester (MD) fed with cow manure, were contrasted in terms of hydrogen performance, substrate disintegration and microbial diversity. NWS outperformed the hydrogen production rate of MD. Microscopic images revealed that NWS acted on the cuticle and epidermis, generating cellulose strands with high crystallinity, while MD degraded deeper layers, equally affecting all polysaccharides. The bacterial composition markedly differed according to the inocula origin. NWS almost solely comprised hydrogen producers of the phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, with 38% members of Enterococcus. After hydrogen fermentation, NWScomprised 8% Syntrophococcus, an acetogen that cleaves aryl ethers of constituent groups on the aromaticcomponents of lignin. Conversely, MD comprised thirteen phyla, primarily including Firmicutes with H2 -producing members, and Bacteroidetes with non-H2 -producing members, which reduced the hydrogen performance. Overall, the results of this study provide clear evidence that the history of adaptation of NWS enhanced the hydrogen performance from untreated wheatstraw. Further, native wheatstrawcommunities have the potential to refine cellulose fibers and produce biofuels simultaneously.
Currently, the bioenergy market is a necessity for society. First‐generation (1G) ethanol production has assisted in the transition towards a low‐carbon economy; however, feedstocks used to produce it compete directly for resources with food production. In contrast, it has been suggested that second‐generation (2G) biofuels could be sustainable, as the use of lignocellulosic residual biomasses derived from forestry, agriculture and agroindustry does not compete directly with food production. Technological processes for 2G biofuel production should fulfil the commitments of white biotechnology achieving more efficient biomass degradation, consuming less energy and resources, generating less waste and obtaining suitable profits. The current technologies for 2G biofuels do not entirely fulfill these conditions, as these processes discharge effluents with residual chemicals, typically use elevated processing temperatures and pressures (> 100°C and 1 atm) and are not commercially viable (Rabemanolontsoa and Saka, 2016). To identify white biotechnologies in the biofuel market, several authors have tested microbial communities or consortia from different sources to mediate biological transformations from lignocellulosic feedstocks into biofuels. For example, microbial communities in anaerobic digesters simultaneously perform various tasks to transform complex substrates, generating methane‐rich biogases (Werner et al., 2011). Because microbial communities act in a single unit, the energy efficiency ratio of anaerobic digesters is higher than those bioprocesses with separate units dedicated to pretreatment, saccharification and fermentation (Börjesson and Mattiasson, 2007). Thus, the question remains whether a similar technology could be applied to produce another type of biofuel, such as bioalcohols or biohydrogen.Hydrogen is a versatile, carbon‐free fuel. Either burning it directly in internal combustion engines or providing electrons for fuel cells, hydrogen supplies a source of pollution‐free energy. Dark fermentation is by far the biological method for producing renewable hydrogen that has the best opportunities for scaling up (Sen et al., 2016). New designs of 2G biorefineries now integrate H2‐producing fermenters as part of a strategy to enhance the end‐use energy efficiency (Sanchez et al., 2016). There are two routes to produce biohydrogen from lignocellulosic feedstocks: as mentioned earlier, configurations with separate units, or configurations using microbial consortia that integrate various operations (e.g. Valdez‐Vazquez et al., 2015; Sanchez et al., 2016).There have been several reports on the performance of microbial consortia for hydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomasses. Typical microbial communities tested for this purpose include sludge from anaerobic digesters, composts and ruminal fluids (Chu et al., 2011; Pérez‐Rangel et al., 2015; Reginatto and Antônio, 2015). In addition, recent studies have highlighted the suitability of using microbial communities to produce liquid biofuels (Ho et al., 2011; Ronan et al., 2013). However, the drawback of using microbial communities has been the low product yields and extended conversion times. There are two potential explanations for the poor performance of such microbial communities. Microbial ecologists suggest that historical factors are determinant in shaping the functioning of native microbial communities (Martiny et al., 2006). For example, soil and sediment microbial communities perform better in their ‘native’ environment than when these communities are exposed to other new environmental conditions, suggesting the local adaptation of microbial communities to their original environments (Strickland et al., 2009; Reed and Martiny, 2013). A recent study showed that the microbial community naturally present in lignocellulosic biomasses outperformed other communities, such as anaerobic sludge, ruminal fluids and the communities present in soil to produce hydrogen from untreated wheatstraw (Pérez‐Rangel et al., 2015). Members of the native microbial community were then isolated and used to integrate a synthetic microbial consortium for producing hydrogen from untreated wheatstraw. The synthetic microbial consortium was unable to consume the entire fraction of the wheatstrawxylan as the native microbial community did (Valdez‐Vazquez et al., 2015). Because in natural lignocellulosic biomasses, lignin forms stable lignin–carbohydratecomplexes (Kajikawa et al., 2000), we assumed that still unknown members of the native wheatstrawcommunity are involved in the disintegration of the xylan–lignincomplexes.The starting point of this study is the design of a cellulosic biorefinery with two sequential bioprocesses, both mediated by microbial consortia. In the first stage, a microbial consortium acts on the lignocellulosic substrate only long enough to consume non‐cellulosicpolysaccharides. The partially fermented substrate is then intended for producing bioalcohols (Valdez‐Vazquez et al., 2015). Keeping this in mind, in this study, we investigated two microbial communities of different origins, native of wheatstraw (NWS) and from a methanogenic digester (MD), to characterize direct hydrogen production from wheatstraw (WS), examine the microscopic arrangement to disintegrate lignocellulosic substrates and determine the composition of the communities using massive sequencing technologies. Overall, the three experimental approaches to characterize the microbial communities of interest enabled the elucidation of the relationship between the inocula origin (reflected as microbial diversity) and function, measured as the hydrogen production rate and substrate degradation of untreated wheatstraw.
Results and discussion
Batch hydrogen production performance
The hydrogen production performance of the NWScommunity was compared with that from a MD using untreated WS as the sole carbon source (Fig. 1). Both microbial communities positively responded to the increase in the substrate concentration; NWS had an increasing in 3.3 ml of H2 with an increase of 1 g of total solids (TS) of substrate. In addition, NWS produced 1.15 times more hydrogen than the MD. In the range of substrate concentrations tested, neither of the two microbial communities exhibited substrate inhibition. Therefore, the substrate concentration at which hydrogen production reaches a maximum would be higher than 5% of TS for both populations. The profile of soluble products indicates that in NWS, already 70% of total soluble products comprised acetate (Fig. 1B). In contrast, MD produced on average 25% of the total soluble products as propionate, a metabolite whose production route represents a hydrogen sink (Reichardt et al., 2014). For both inocula, large quantities of acetate were recovered. The hydrogen/acetate ratio ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 for NWS and from 0.2 to 0.8 for MD. The hydrogen/acetate ratios suggest that acetogens were active in both microbial communities. Also, the metabolite profile in MD is a clear indicative of the existence of propionate producers competing for the substrate. A case study dealing with changes in hydrogen production with pH observed that the activity of propionate producers was stimulated at pH varying from 5.0 to 6.0. At this pH range, propionate was the major soluble metabolite positively related with the undermining of hydrogen production (Hwang et al., 2004). Given the initial pH of 6.5 in the batch tests, the activity of propionate producers could be stimulated. Besides propionate, the metabolite profiles for NWS and MD showed differences in the production of butyrate. MD produced quantities of butyrate that could have resulted in more hydrogen than NWS. However, the opposite was observed: NWS produced more hydrogen than MD. There could be at least one explanation for this behaviour, if, for example, butyrate‐producing pathways occurred in MD without hydrogen formation. Catabolism of fructose, a sugar present in the water‐soluble fraction of WS, produces butyrate without hydrogen (Falony et al., 2009; Tishler et al., 2015). Also, acetate – the main metabolite in the batch tests – acts as precursors of butyrate (Pryde et al., 2002). The results of microbial diversity revealed the identity of MD members whose metabolisms lead to the production of propionate and butyrate.
Figure 1
Performance of two microbial communities, native of wheat straw (NWS) and of a methanogenic digester (MD) for hydrogen production from untreated wheat straw after 7 days of incubation.
A. Hydrogen production and B. soluble products. Errors bars indicate standard deviation (n = 4).
Performance of two microbial communities, native of wheatstraw (NWS) and of a methanogenic digester (MD) for hydrogen production from untreated wheatstraw after 7 days of incubation.A. Hydrogen production and B. soluble products. Errors bars indicate standard deviation (n = 4).NWS was highly competitive in short‐term fermentations, with a hydrogen yield 1.15 times higher than that achieved with MD (17 ml of H2 per g of volatile solid (VS) for NWS versus 15 ml of H2/g‐VS for MD). After comparing the hydrogen performance under a mesophilic regime of different communities fermenting untreated wheatstraw, the maximum yields reached by NWS and MD were at the same level than those previously reported ranging from 3 to 37 ml of H2/g‐VS (Chu et al., 2011; Quéméneur et al., 2012; Pérez‐Rangel et al., 2015). However, in terms of hydrogen production rate (Rm, determined from the modified Gompertz equation), NWS displayed a higher value of R
m with 72 ml of H2/d than MD with a value of 55 ml of H2/d. NWS also outperformed the values of R
m reported for the other microbial communities which varying from 8 ml of H2/d to 68 ml of H2/d (Chu et al., 2011; Quéméneur et al., 2012; Pérez‐Rangel et al., 2015). In the present study, the increase in substrate concentration to nearly 5% TS resulted in an improvement in R
m.
Microscopic observations
The total removal of volatile solids was similar for both microbial communities, showing on average 30% (± 3%) for NWS and 32% (± 9%) for MD. However, the extent degradation and functions of both hydrogen‐producing communities on the wheatstraw differed. In Fig. 2, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs show the epidermal zone and stomata of WS. Unfermented WS had a smooth surface, reflecting the waxy layer (cuticle) that covers the epidermal cells (Xu, 2009). The epidermis containing long cells and shortcells with silica bodies and stomata were observed, consistent with Andrade et al. (2012). All anatomical structures observed were intact (Fig. 2.1A,B). NWS superficially digested the WS, eliminating the cuticle and partially degrading the epidermis; thus, the tabular epidermal cells and silica bodies were exposed. Additionally, guard cells were partially degraded (Fig. 2.2A,B). In contrast, MD degraded deeper layers, and the epidermis, where stomata are localized, was peeled off, exposing the next layer, the cortex, which contains collenchyma and parenchyma cells (Xu, 2009). In SEM images for MD, guard cells of deeply degraded stomata and holes in place of stomata were common in the analysed surfaces. Moreover, the anticlinal walls [walls separating the two adjacent cells in the same layer of the epidermal cells (Jääskeläinen et al., 2013)] disappeared in some regions of the epidermis, presumably causing the structure of long cells to collapse (Fig. 2.3A,B).
Figure 2
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) photograph of wheat straw.
A. Structure of the epidermis of wheat straw showing long cells, short cells with silica bodies and stomata.
B. Structure of stomata from wheat straw. (1) Before hydrogen fermentation and after 7 days of hydrogen fermentation by (2) the native community of wheat straw (NWS) and (3) of a methanogenic digester (MD).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) photograph of wheatstraw.A. Structure of the epidermis of wheatstraw showing long cells, shortcells with silica bodies and stomata.B. Structure of stomata from wheatstraw. (1) Before hydrogen fermentation and after 7 days of hydrogen fermentation by (2) the native community of wheatstraw (NWS) and (3) of a methanogenic digester (MD).Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) showed the site of polysaccharide degradation on these anatomical structures. Unfermented WS presented high green fluorescence with sinuous but well‐defined epidermal cells. The safranin staining of polysaccharides revealed irregular zones inside the epidermal cell anticlinal walls (arrowhead). These irregular zones play a relevant role in microbial degradation in NWS (Fig. 3.1A,B). After hydrogen fermentation, NWS left sinuous polysaccharide strands primarily corresponding to cellulose fibrils (Pérez‐Rangel et al., 2015). The activity of NWS was discontinuous, acting locally on irregular zones of the anticlinal walls and failing to penetrate deeper layers. Similar to the observation obtained from the SEM images, the stomatal guard cells were not extensively disturbed (Fig. 3.2A,B).
Figure 3
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of polysaccharides in wheat straw stained with Safranine O (green fluorescence).
A. Structure of the epidermis of wheat straw showing long and short cells.
B. Structure of stomata and short cells with silica bodies. (1) Before hydrogen fermentation and after 7 days of hydrogen fermentation by (2) the native community of wheat straw (NWS) and (3) of a methanogenic digester (MD).
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of polysaccharides in wheatstraw stained with Safranine O (green fluorescence).A. Structure of the epidermis of wheatstraw showing long and shortcells.B. Structure of stomata and shortcells with silica bodies. (1) Before hydrogen fermentation and after 7 days of hydrogen fermentation by (2) the native community of wheatstraw (NWS) and (3) of a methanogenic digester (MD).Regarding MD, the pattern of waviness of the epidermal cells was fairly conserved, and the uniform decrease in polysaccharide fluorescence indicated that MD showed a wide range of action on the carbohydrate fraction (Fig. 3.3A,B). The crystallinity index (CI) of cellulose after fermentation revealed that MD degraded equally amorphous and crystalline cellulose (CI of 50.1% for the unfermented WS versus 45.9% for the fermented WS). In contrast, NWSconsumed amorphous cellulose leaving cellulose strands with high crystallinity (CI of 52.7% after fermentation, Fig. S1 in Supporting information).
Bacterial diversity and composition
Original microbes of the studied communities and those remaining after 7 days of hydrogen fermentation were characterized using massive DNA pyrosequencing analysis (Fig. 4). A total of 49508 reads were obtained. After quality filters, NWS presented 9706 and 8870 reads before and after fermentation, respectively, while MD showed 9987 and 16220 reads before and after fermentation respectively. The median read length was 455 bps for all samples. Good‐quality reads were classified as different operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at the 97% sequence similarity cut‐off. The rarefaction analysis of OTUs showed a sufficient sampling effort for both microbial communities (see Fig. S2 in Supporting information). For NWS, more than 99.9% OTUs could be taxonomically assigned to at phylum level (Fig. 4). For MD, the percentages of taxonomically assigned OTUs were 63.7% and 98.9% before and after fermentation respectively (Fig. 4). The total number of distinct bacterial OTUs observed for NWS and MD were 21 and 75 respectively.
Figure 4
Proportion of major OTUs found in the H2‐producing reactors from wheat straw.
A. Native wheat straw community and B. community of a methanogenic digester.
Proportion of major OTUs found in the H2‐producing reactors from wheatstraw.A. Native wheatstrawcommunity and B. community of a methanogenic digester.Members of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria evenly composed the original NWS (top panel in Fig. 4). The species richness observed for this microbial consortium was 19 with a Shannon index of 1.51. Notably, two species of Enterococcus dominated, composing 42% of the consortium. One member of the family Enterobacteriaceae represented 35% of the entire consortium. Clostridium, a typical hydrogen producer, represented only 7% of the original NWS including four different species (bottom panel in Fig. 4). Surprisingly, the population structure of NWS was nearly unaffected after hydrogen fermentation (species richness of 11 and Shannon index of 1.59). The two species of Enterococcus exhibited changes in abundance but together still accounted for almost 40% of total. The various species of Clostridium, Escherichia and Klebsiella also undergo minor changes. However, the most notable change was the increase in abundance of the genus Syntrophococcus from < 1% to 8%.Original MD comprised 13 phyla, where Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominated, with 23.7% and 19.0% respectively (top panel in Fig. 4). The species richness for the original MD was 74 with a Shannon index of 3.09. In the original MD, Clostridium and Bacteroides represented 21.5% of the total of bacterial species. After hydrogen fermentation, the diversity and composition of the MD showed visible alterations (bottom panel in Fig. 4). The species richness decreased to 63 with a Shannon index of 2.43. At the end of fermentation, Roseburia, Bacteroides and Escherichia accounted for 60.2% of the total.The bacterial composition greatly differed according to inocula origin. The most remarkable characteristic of the original NWS was the lack of aerobic members, which were expected based on previous reports of epiphytic bacteria, such as Methylobacterium, Sphingomonas and Pseudomonas (Vorholt, 2012). The only aerobic members observed in the original NWS that previously were reported as part of epiphyticcommunities were Pseudomonas and Pantoea (< 1%). Instead, the original NWS was enriched with facultative and strict anaerobes, likely reflecting the sun‐drying at which the wheat plants were subjected before harvest and the time in which the wheatstraw was stored. Under indoor conditions (28°C and 55% relative humidity), all obligate aerobes died and only some genera, such as Enterococcus, survived on wheatstraw. Previous reports have determined that Enterococcus faecalis survived well for extended periods under nutrient‐starvation conditions on solid substrates or water (Mackey and Hinton, 1990; Lebreton et al., 2014). These fortuitous events selected for bacterial species adapting to the new environmental conditions inside the anaerobic bioreactors. After hydrogen fermentation, Enterococcus and members of the family Enterobacteriaceae remained without major changes in abundance. The genus Enterococcuscomprises members typically found in human and animal gastrointestinal tracts, the guts of insects, such as termites, plants, soil and water, and fermented foods and dairy products (Lebreton et al., 2014). Importantly, Enterococcus has been reported in a few hydrogen‐producing consortia (Liu et al., 2009; Pendyala et al., 2013). Recently, Valdez‐Vazquez et al. (2015) isolated and tested various strains of Enterococcus from the NWS. Such enterococcal strains efficiently convert soluble xylan. However, when cultivated under a natural polysaccharide matrix, these strains were incapable of completely degrading the xylan fraction consuming merely 30%. In natural lignocellulosic biomasses, xylan is linked to lignin via ether groups, forming xylan–lignincomplexes (Kajikawa et al., 2000; Lawoko et al., 2006). The incapacity of Enterococcus to consume the entire xylan fraction could reflect the absence of some lignin‐releasing members from the NWS. After hydrogen fermentation, the abundance of obligate anaerobic, acetogen Syntrophococcus, increased. The genus Syntrophococcus, belonging to the family Lachnospiraceae, was originally isolated from rumen (Krumholz and Bryant, 1986). Syntrophococcus recognizes and cleaves the methyl groups within the polymeric structure of lignin as a one‐carbon source to release acetate and the corresponding hydroxyl derivatives. In anaerobic environments, this O‐demethylating acetogen plays a relevant role in the mineralization of ligno‐aromaticcompounds in conjunction with other anaerobes that metabolize the aromatic ring structure (Doré and Bryant, 1990; Frazer, 1994; Bernard‐Vailhé et al., 1995). Because in native lignocellulosic substrates, xylan exists in the form of xylan–lignincomplexes, Syntrophococcus twinned with fermentative bacteria could act as a catalyst for the degradation of the xylan fraction of native substrates, particularly in zones with highly lignified cells, such as the epidermal layer. In contrast, the cellulose fraction is not affected by the presence of these phenolic‐degrading acetogens. These observations support the findings of the present study, as Syntrophococcus, in conjunction with the remaining members of the NWS, primarily reported as H2 producers (Enterococcus, Enterobacter, Clostridium, Klebsiella, Escherichia and Citrobacter), hydrolysed the non‐cellulosic fraction of the WS to produce hydrogen, leaving unconsumed crystalline cellulose.The original MD was distinguished based on the high level of diversity consistent with previous reports, where the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were predominant (Klang et al., 2015). After hydrogen fermentation, five bacterial genera predominated: Bacteroides, Roseburia, Escherichia, Enterococcus and Clostridium. The genera Escherichia, Enterococcus and Clostridium represented the hydrogen‐producing population in the MD. Regarding Roseburia, some isolates express xylanase and endoglucanase activities producing H2, CO2 as well as formate, butyrate, succinate and lactate (Chassard et al., 2007, 2010). Similar to Syntrophococcus, Roseburia belongs to the family Lachnospiraceae, and these bacteria have been implicated in the disintegration of complex substrates. Roseburia along with other anaerobes belonging to the Clostridial clusters IV and XIVa are recognized as the main producers of butyrate by the microbial communities present in the humancolon and rumen (Pryde et al., 2002). The catabolism of carbohydrates by Roseburia produces hydrogen. However, as outlined above, it seems that butyrate‐producing species were active without hydrogen formation. Roseburia inulinivorans perform the oligofructose degradation producing butyrate and CO2, but not H2 (Falony et al., 2009). Roseburia intestinalisconverts acetate into butyrate with oligofructose as the sole energy source without hydrogen formation (Pryde et al., 2002). In this way, it appears that Roseburia representing almost 20% of the MD community could be responsible for butyrate formation, but with little or no contribution to the formation of hydrogen. Equivalent to one‐fifth of the abundance, the genus Bacteroides, belonging to the family Bacteroidaceae, was one of the most important bacteria in the MD. Some Bacteroides have been previously identified as relevant members of the fibrolytic microbial community in the humancolon, degrading a wide range of polysaccharides, such as cellulose, xylan, starch and pectin generating acetate, propionate and succinate (Robert et al., 2007). In methane‐producing populations, Bacteroides plays a dual role, degrading complex polysaccharides and contributing to volatile organic acids, which are subsequently converted into methane, poorly contributing to hydrogen formation (Chassard et al., 2010). Bacteroides is primarily identified as a non‐H2‐producing cellulose‐degrading species. Therefore, in MD, Bacteroidescould be responsible for decreasing the hydrogen yield when substrates without hydrogen formation were consumed to produce propionate. As mentioned earlier, an initial pH of 6.5 along with protein from the medium stimulated the activity of Bacteroides during the first days of incubation decreasing the potential of hydrogen production (Hwang et al., 2004; Walker et al., 2005).At this point, it is important to stress that care is needed when comparing results of culture‐independent studies, such as the presented here, with the metaboliccapabilities of isolated strains from the same genera or families. Some hypothesis from these comparisons can be derived and further investigated, like the role of specific species, genera or families in the overall functionality of bioreactors. To this end, it is in fact needed to continue strain isolation efforts to study directly strain metaboliccapabilities, and also to pursue transcriptomic and proteomic efforts in bioreactors that will allow a better understanding of functionality.
Biotechnological and ecological considerations
The findings of the present study have biotechnological and ecological implications. From a technological point of view, the members that integrate the NWScommunity are interesting to characterize because they have developed specialized enzymatic machinery to hydrolyse the xylan fraction with minor alterations in the cellulose fraction (refer to the microscopic observations). Thus, the partially refined cellulosecan then be intended for producing other biofuels under a biorefinery approach. Two members are of special interest: Enterococcus and Syntrophococcus, both of which were highly abundant in NWScommunities. Enterococcus is an H2‐producing, facultative anaerobe that survives during prolonged periods of starvation and produces bacteriocins (Leroy et al., 2003). These characteristics make Enterococcus highly desirable for large robust facilities for 2G biofuel production. For H2‐producing consortia enriched with Enterococcus, the anaerobicconditions for the regulation of growth could be relaxed, and the produced bacteriocins could limit the growth of undesired bacteria competing for the substrate. On the other hand, Syntrophococcus belongs to a family of acetogenic bacteria that catalyses O‐demethylation of constituent groups on the aromaticcomponents of lignin. Other O‐demethylating bacteria also include Acetobacterium woodi, Clostridium pfennigii, Eubacteriumcallandri (Frazer, 1994). The specificcleavage of β‐aryl ethers bonds in lignin, accounting for approximately 50% of all the linkages in lignin, has been implicated in recovering valuable aromatic groups of lignin while refining cellulose (Reiter et al., 2013; Strassberger et al., 2013). To some extent, Syntrophococcus in conjunction with selected members of the NWSconsortium could serve as an efficient biological pretreatment to refine cellulose fibers and to produce bioenergy in the form of hydrogen. Instead of dedicated units for high energy‐demanding pretreatments, saccharification and fermentation, 2G biofuel production facilities could install anaerobic fermenters with NWS microbial communities that, as shown in the present study, can degrade and efficiently ferment WS. The added environmental benefits are the elimination of acid or alkali compounds, elimination of pretreatment units obviates the formation of fermentation inhibitors, specificcleavage of ethers in lignin would preserve aromaticcompounds for further industrial applications, and the refinement of cellulose strands for liquid biofuel production (ethanol/butanol). The implementation of such dual bioprocesses for biological pretreatment and hydrogen production would generate higher energy efficiency ratios and product yields than bioprocesses with separate units. In any case, additional studies using native strains of lignocellulosic biomasses are necessary to explore the roles of these bacteria in improving the rates of substrate consumption and product formation with other lignocellulosic substrates.The results of the present study indicate that the inocula origin reflected differences in the microbial community composition, thereby affecting the hydrogen performance from untreated wheatstraw. The primary population structure of NWS remained with minor alterations after hydrogen fermentations; only changes in abundances of some members were detected. In contrast, several members of MD become extinct after hydrogen fermentations. These results are a clear indication that NWS was already adapted to grow on WS. The time of storage for 6 months acted such as an adaptation process in which the microflora naturally present on the surface of WScould adapt to the lignocellulosic substrate before the hydrogen tests. In the course of these 6 months, major changes in the population structure of NWScould occur with the extinction of aerobic members and those with little resistance over long periods of storage. The long‐time storage resulted in a stabilized, adapted NWSconsortium. These results resemble those microbial communities present in the stabilization period of fermentations or digestion processes. Microbial community dynamics of different bioprocesses involving lignocellulosic substrates indicate that microbial communities can be grouped into three categories based on pattern similarities: at the start‐up, during the growing period and at the stabilization period (Li et al., 2015; Yan et al., 2015). Also, the population structure remains stable over time if the operating conditions such as temperature and substrate are kept (Sun et al., 2015). By comparison with previous of microbial communities acting on lignocellulosic substrates, NWScan be considered such as a microbial community coming from the stabilization period of an adaptation process to WS, whereas MD consisted of a microbial community experiencing an adaptation process to the new substrate. Thus, history of adaptation of each microbial community determined the short‐term shifts in population structure.Similar observations have previously been reported for other systems, such as soil and sediments, in terms of biogeochemical transformations and the activity of microbial communities (Strickland et al., 2009; Reed and Martiny, 2013). Studies of microbial ecology stated that historical factors determine the functioning of microbial communities, as these microbes behave better under their original environments (Strickland et al., 2009). In the present study, several unmeasured environmental conditions differed from the environment of which the microbial communities were derived; however, we assume that the substrate could be the main factor driving the behaviour of both consortia.The above‐mentioned result highlights the importance of the ecological context and perspective, while selecting for specific microbially mediated enzymatic processes, such as lignocellulosic fermentation. Thus, the ecological perspective of these results raises questions about what microbial composition is better to disintegrate and ferment different lignocellulosic biomasses into target biofuels, where such microbial communities prosper, and how the bioreactor conditions affect the functioning of such communities. The microbial composition of NWS almost entirely included hydrogen producers and lignin‐degrading members that presumably acted together to increase xylan fermentation into hydrogen and soluble end‐products. In contrast, MD comprised non‐H2‐producing members that degraded substrates and therefore reduce the hydrogen yield. Based on these results, functionally robust H2‐producing communities must integrate members of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, avoiding the sampling of natural communities in which Bacteroidetes is present.In summary, this study presents the shifts in population structure during hydrogen production from a lignocellulosic substrate of two microbial communities with variations in life history traits. Differences between the NWS and MD communities were notable, before and after the hydrogen fermentations, where the former exhibited changes only in the proportion of their members, whereas the later had members that were extinct after fermentations. The history of the NWScommunity may have been decisive in shaping a better functioning than the MD community. Finally, new members in the NWScommunity were identified with potential for refining cellulose and producing hydrogen.
Experimental procedures
Lignocellulosic substrate and sources of inocula
Winter wheatstraw (Triticum aestivum L.; cultivar. Urbina S2007) was mechanically harvested at 120 days after planting. The chopped straw samples were milled, and only particles retained in a 2 mm sieve were used in the present study. The chemical composition of wheatstraw was previously reported by Valdez‐Vazquez et al. (2016), where the cellulose, hemicellulose and lignincontents were 387 g, 190 g and 173 g per kg respectively.Methanogenic digester microbial community was obtained from the sludge of a digester fed with cow manure operated at a hydraulic retention time of 28 days, with a volatile solid removal efficiency of 35%, at pH 7.5, and a methane yield of 164 L‐CH4/kg‐VS. The sludge composition was 30 g l−1 of total solids (TS) and 22 g l−1 of volatile solids (VS).Native wheatstraw microbial communities were obtained inoculating the bioreactors with non‐sterile wheatstraw. The wheatstraw was stored indoors (28°C and 55% relative humidity) in opaque containers for 6 months prior to conducting the hydrogen production tests.
Batch hydrogen fermentations
Serum bottles with volume of 150 ml served as anaerobic bioreactors. The bioreactors were run in quadruplicate for different wheatstraw loads: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 g of wheatstraw. For bioreactors with microbial communities from methanogenic digesters, the containers with wheatstraw and medium were sterilized in an autoclave. After cooling, 20 ml of anaerobic sludge was added as inoculum (after filtering through gauze), and the bioreactors were supplemented with sterile medium to 100 g. The endogenous hydrogen production of MD was determined from bioreactors loaded with anaerobic sludge and medium without substrate (resulting in a negligible biogas accumulation in the whole incubation). For bioreactors with microbial communities from wheatstraw, the bioreactors with non‐sterile wheatstraw were supplemented with sterile medium to 100 g. The composition of the medium was 0.50 g of yeast extract, 0.25 g of tryptone, 0.25 g of meat extract, 2.10 g of MgSO4 and 2.00 g of KH2PO4, pH 6.5. All bioreactors were sealed with a rubber septum and a screw under an atmosphere of nitrogen and incubated at 37°C under staticconditions.
Analytical methods
Biogas accumulation was periodically measured as the displacement of a lubricated syringe. The biogas composition (H2, O2, CO2 and CH4) was analysed by gas chromatography following the analysis conditions previously reported (Cardeña et al., 2015). The soluble metabolites were measured from the culture supernatants after the samples were centrifuged at 8000 × g for 5 min and filtered through a 0.45 μm filter. Subsequently, the supernatants were analysed using a gas chromatograph (7890; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector and a 15 m long BD‐FFAP column (530 × 1 μm). The injector and detector temperatures were maintained at 190 and 210°C respectively. The temperature of the column was maintained at 60°C, after which it increased to 90°C at a rate of 15°C min−1 and then to 170°C at a rate of 25°C min−1 for 4 min. The carrier gas was nitrogen at 2.5 ml min−1. Total volatile solids and pH were determined according to APHA Standard Methods (Eaton and Franson, 2005).
Microscopic analyses
SEM and CLSM were used to elucidate the mode of substrate disintegration of each microbial community on the wheatstraw. Only untreated WS and bioreactors with the best hydrogen performance were analysed. SEM analysis was conducted using a JEOL JSM‐7600F SEM (JEOL Ltd., Tokio, Japan) operated at 10 kV with a low‐angle backscattered electron detector. The samples were coated with gold. Polysaccharides were stained with safranin O and subsequently visualized under a CLSM as previously reported (Pérez‐Rangel et al., 2015).
Cellulose crystallinity index
Changes in cellulosecrystallinity resulting from fermentations by different microbial communities with the best performance were determined using X‐ray powder diffraction according to Segal et al. (1959). The data were collected using a Rigaku Ultima IV (Rigaku Americas, TX, USA) under analysis conditions according to Valdez‐Vazquez et al. (2015). Crystallinity indices were presented as percentages.
DNA extraction, pyrosequencing and data processing
Ten grams of samples of homogenized inocula generated at the end of hydrogen fermentation (communities in bioreactors with the best hydrogen performance only) was stored at −70°C until further analysis. Genomic DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of samples containing both solid particles and supernatants using the Power Soil DNA Extraction Kit® (Mo Bio Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For all samples, the four replicates were combined into a single mixture (25 μl of each DNA extract). Subsequently, the DNA concentration was adjusted to 20 ng μl−1 and sent to the Research and Testing Laboratory, RTL (Lubbock, Texas, USA), for the amplification of the 16S rRNA gene and pyrosequencing. Amplification of the 16S rRNA gene V1‐V3 region was performed using primers 28F–519R (Dowd et al., 2008), and subsequent sequencing using a Roche 454 FLX performed at RTL. A denoising protocol was used to remove short sequences, singleton sequences and noisy reads following the USEARCH algorithm (Edgar, 2010). All chimeric sequences were removed using the UCHIME software executed in de novo mode (Edgar et al., 2011). Only sequences longer than 250 bp with a quality score higher than 30 were kept. OTU selection was performed using the UPARSE algorithm (Edgar, 2013). The USEARCH global alignment algorithm along with a python program was used to assign the taxonomic identity for each of the OTUs using a database derived from the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and maintained by RTL. These sequence data were deposited in the GenBank database under accession number SRP076729. The species richness was calculated using the number of OTUs found in each sample. The Shannon diversity index (H) was calculated using the relative abundance of each OTU in the total sum.
Conflict of interest
None declared.Fig. S1. X‐ray diffraction spectra of wheatstraw for calculating crystallinity index (CI).Fig. S2. Rarefaction plot of species richness, subsampling from 500 to 20 000 reads.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Jennifer B Hughes Martiny; Brendan J M Bohannan; James H Brown; Robert K Colwell; Jed A Fuhrman; Jessica L Green; M Claire Horner-Devine; Matthew Kane; Jennifer Adams Krumins; Cheryl R Kuske; Peter J Morin; Shahid Naeem; Lise Ovreås; Anna-Louise Reysenbach; Val H Smith; James T Staley Journal: Nat Rev Microbiol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 60.633
Authors: Susan E Pryde; Sylvia H Duncan; Georgina L Hold; Colin S Stewart; Harry J Flint Journal: FEMS Microbiol Lett Date: 2002-12-17 Impact factor: 2.742
Authors: Alan W Walker; Sylvia H Duncan; E Carol McWilliam Leitch; Matthew W Child; Harry J Flint Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.792