Literature DB >> 28296005

Ischemic postconditioning during primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Amgad Mentias1, Ahmed N Mahmoud2, Islam Y Elgendy2, Akram Y Elgendy2, Amr F Barakat3, A Sami Abuzaid4, Marwan Saad5, Samir R Kapadia6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although some studies have shown potential benefit for ischemic postconditioning (IPoC) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in improving surrogate markers of reperfusion and infarction size, the benefit of this approach on clinical outcomes remains unknown. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized clinical trials that compared IPoC versus conventional treatment during primary PCI. Random effects DerSimonian-Laird risk ratios (RR) were calculated for different clinical and surrogate outcomes. The main outcome of this analysis was all-cause mortality. A total of 25 trials involving 3,619 patients were included in the analysis. At a mean follow up of 14 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.6-19.4 months), the incidence of all-cause mortality was 4.9% [95% CI 3.8-6.0%] in the IPoC group versus 3.8% [95% CI 1.9-5.7%] in the control group (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68-1.24, P = 0.74). The risk of reinfarction (2.7% [95% CI 1.1-4.3%] vs. 2.3% [0.6-4.0%]; RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.62-2.68, P = 0.72), heart failure (3.6% [95% CI 2.0-5.1%] vs. 5.7% [95% CI 3.3-8.2%]; RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.58-1.06, P = 0.24), target vessel revascularization (3.2% [95% CI 1.7-4.7%] vs. 2.4% [95% CI 1.4-3.3%]; RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.90-2.20, P = 0.20), and stent thrombosis (2.4% [95% CI 1.1-3.8%] vs. 1.8% [95% CI 0.5-3.2%]); RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.60-3.70, P = 0.40) was similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: IPoC does not appear to reduce the risk of clinical adverse events in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ischemic postconditioning; STEMI; primary PCI

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28296005     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

1.  Microvascular obstruction in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: another frontier to conquer?

Authors:  Islam Y Elgendy; Hani Jneid
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  New and revisited approaches to preserving the reperfused myocardium.

Authors:  Robert A Kloner; David A Brown; Marie Csete; Wangde Dai; James M Downey; Roberta A Gottlieb; Sharon L Hale; Jianru Shi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Pharmacological protection of reperfusion injury in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Gone with the wind?

Authors:  Elisabetta Tonet; Davide Bernucci; Giampaolo Morciano; Gianluca Campo
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 1.426

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.