Elizabeth Papathanassoglou1, Nicos Middleton2, Julie Benbenishty3, Ged Williams4, Maria-Dolores Christofi2, Kathleen Hegadoren5. 1. Edmonton Clinic Health Academy (ECHA), 11405-87th Ave., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 2. Department of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus. 3. Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. 4. Griffith University, Abu Dhabi Health Service, UAE. 5. University of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Men and women appear to exhibit different susceptibilities to sepsis and possibly divergent outcomes. However, the effect of sex and gender in critical illness outcomes is still controversial and the underlying mechanisms appear to be complex. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to systematically review and synthesize evidence on the influence of sex on outcomes in critically ill adult patients with sepsis, as reported in published studies specifically including investigation of the effect of sex among their aims. Primary outcome measures include in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and length of stay (LOS) in the ICU. SEARCH STRATEGY: The review was based on focused literature searches (CINAHL, PUBMED, EMBASE and COCHRANE). Methodological quality was assessed through the STROBE checklist and the Cochrane Tool for Bias in Cohort Studies. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA. Published observational studies addressing outcomes of sepsis among their primary aims and having included gender comparisons among primary outcomes in critically ill adult patients were included. RESULTS: A total of eight eligible studies were included. With the exception of mortality, it was not possible to perform meta-analysis for other outcomes. Included studies reported data on 25,619 patients with sepsis (14 309 male/11 310 female). There is a paucity of well-designed studies addressing the effect of sex on mortality among patients with sepsis, and absence of studies addressing the effects of sex on multiple organ dysfunction of non-infectious origin. There was significant heterogeneity among study estimates (p = 0·001; I2 =78·1%). CONCLUSIONS: Although results of data syntheses appear to point towards a small disadvantage for survival among women, our results suggest that data on the impact of sex on sepsis outcomes remain equivocal. Implications for future research include approaches to adjustment for confounders and prospective designs. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Clarifying sex-related differences in sepsis, if any, is crucial for informing evidence-based care.
BACKGROUND:Men and women appear to exhibit different susceptibilities to sepsis and possibly divergent outcomes. However, the effect of sex and gender in critical illness outcomes is still controversial and the underlying mechanisms appear to be complex. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to systematically review and synthesize evidence on the influence of sex on outcomes in critically ill adult patients with sepsis, as reported in published studies specifically including investigation of the effect of sex among their aims. Primary outcome measures include in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and length of stay (LOS) in the ICU. SEARCH STRATEGY: The review was based on focused literature searches (CINAHL, PUBMED, EMBASE and COCHRANE). Methodological quality was assessed through the STROBE checklist and the Cochrane Tool for Bias in Cohort Studies. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA. Published observational studies addressing outcomes of sepsis among their primary aims and having included gender comparisons among primary outcomes in critically ill adult patients were included. RESULTS: A total of eight eligible studies were included. With the exception of mortality, it was not possible to perform meta-analysis for other outcomes. Included studies reported data on 25,619 patients with sepsis (14 309 male/11 310 female). There is a paucity of well-designed studies addressing the effect of sex on mortality among patients with sepsis, and absence of studies addressing the effects of sex on multiple organ dysfunction of non-infectious origin. There was significant heterogeneity among study estimates (p = 0·001; I2 =78·1%). CONCLUSIONS: Although results of data syntheses appear to point towards a small disadvantage for survival among women, our results suggest that data on the impact of sex on sepsis outcomes remain equivocal. Implications for future research include approaches to adjustment for confounders and prospective designs. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Clarifying sex-related differences in sepsis, if any, is crucial for informing evidence-based care.
Authors: Georges Jacques Casimir; Nicolas Lefèvre; Francis Corazza; Jean Duchateau; Mustapha Chamekh Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Jesus Lopez-Alcalde; Alba Antequera Martín; Elena Stallings; Alfonso Muriel; Borja Fernández-Félix; Ivan Solà; Rosa Del Campo; Manuel Ponce-Alonso; Federico Gordo; Pilar Fidalgo; Ana Verónica Halperin; Noelia Álvarez-Díaz; Olaya Madrid-Pascual; Gerard Urrutia; Javier Zamora Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: MengQi Zhang; Joshua Montroy; Rahul Sharma; Dean A Fergusson; Asher A Mendelson; Kimberly F Macala; Stephane L Bourque; Jared M Schlechte; Mikaela K Eng; Braedon McDonald; Sean E Gill; Kirsten M Fiest; Patricia C Liaw; Alison Fox-Robichaud; Manoj M Lalu Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-06-14