M-V Senat1,2,3, H Bouchghoul1,2,3, J Stirnemann4,5, P Vaast2,6, J Boubnova2,7, L Begue8, E Carricaburu9, A Sartor10, J Jani11, A Benachi2,12, J Bouyer1. 1. Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Villejuif, France. 2. Centre Maladie Rare: Hernie de Coupole Diaphragmatique, Paris, France. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France. 5. Université Paris Descartes 5 CHU Lille, Pôle Femme Mère Nouveau-né, Lille, France. 6. Université Lille, EA 4489, Environnement Périnatal et Santé, Lille, France. 7. Service de Chirurgie Pédiatrique, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France. 8. Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Montpellier, France. 9. Service de Chirurgie Pédiatrique, Hopital Robert Debré, AP-HP, Paris, France. 10. Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique Paule de Viguier Hospital, Toulouse, France. 11. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 12. Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, AP-HP, Paris-Sud, Paris-Saclay University, Clamart, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a severe anomaly. The observed-to-expected lung-area-to-head-circumference ratio (o/e-LHR) has been shown to provide a useful prediction of subsequent survival of fetuses with CDH in referral centers with expertise and a large caseload. However, the accuracy of o/e-LHR measurements in general fetal medicine units with less expertise is not well known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity of o/e-LHR to provide a useful prediction of mortality of fetuses with CDH when the measurement is performed in fetal medicine units with different levels of expertise. METHODS: Between January 2008 and November 2013, 305 live births with expectantly managed left-sided isolated CDH were recorded in the database of the French National Center for Rare Diseases (31 centers) and followed up after birth. Centers were grouped into two categories according to their mean annual CDH caseload over the study period: large centers with an average of ≥ 14 cases and smaller centers with < 14 cases per year. The relationship between o/e-LHR and 28-day and 6-month mortality was modeled using fractional polynomials and the predictive value of o/e-LHR was quantified using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve. Comparisons between the two center categories were carried out. Analyses were adjusted for potential confounders such as thoracic herniation of the liver and gestational age at birth and at diagnosis. RESULTS: During the study period, two large centers managed a total of 82 CDH cases and 29 smaller centers a total of 223 CDH cases. Overall, there was a significant inverse relationship between 28-day mortality rate and o/e-LHR, which decreased from 54% when o/e-LHR was 20% to 6% when o/e-LHR was 75% (P < 0.01). When the category of center was considered, adjusted associations between o/e-LHR and 28-day mortality were significantly different (P = 0.032) between large and smaller centers. The ability to predict survival at 28 days postpartum based on o/e-LHR was better in large centers; for a specificity of 0.30, the sensitivity was 0.71 in large centers and 0.55 in smaller ones. The results were similar for 6-month mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that o/e-LHR measured on two-dimensional ultrasound is a good indicator of neonatal prognosis in cases of CDH that may be used even in fetal medicine centers with a small caseload. However, our results also suggest that LHR measurement may be difficult to perform correctly. Therefore, appropriate training should be offered to professionals.
OBJECTIVE:Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a severe anomaly. The observed-to-expected lung-area-to-head-circumference ratio (o/e-LHR) has been shown to provide a useful prediction of subsequent survival of fetuses with CDH in referral centers with expertise and a large caseload. However, the accuracy of o/e-LHR measurements in general fetal medicine units with less expertise is not well known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity of o/e-LHR to provide a useful prediction of mortality of fetuses with CDH when the measurement is performed in fetal medicine units with different levels of expertise. METHODS: Between January 2008 and November 2013, 305 live births with expectantly managed left-sided isolated CDH were recorded in the database of the French National Center for Rare Diseases (31 centers) and followed up after birth. Centers were grouped into two categories according to their mean annual CDH caseload over the study period: large centers with an average of ≥ 14 cases and smaller centers with < 14 cases per year. The relationship between o/e-LHR and 28-day and 6-month mortality was modeled using fractional polynomials and the predictive value of o/e-LHR was quantified using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve. Comparisons between the two center categories were carried out. Analyses were adjusted for potential confounders such as thoracic herniation of the liver and gestational age at birth and at diagnosis. RESULTS: During the study period, two large centers managed a total of 82 CDH cases and 29 smaller centers a total of 223 CDH cases. Overall, there was a significant inverse relationship between 28-day mortality rate and o/e-LHR, which decreased from 54% when o/e-LHR was 20% to 6% when o/e-LHR was 75% (P < 0.01). When the category of center was considered, adjusted associations between o/e-LHR and 28-day mortality were significantly different (P = 0.032) between large and smaller centers. The ability to predict survival at 28 days postpartum based on o/e-LHR was better in large centers; for a specificity of 0.30, the sensitivity was 0.71 in large centers and 0.55 in smaller ones. The results were similar for 6-month mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that o/e-LHR measured on two-dimensional ultrasound is a good indicator of neonatal prognosis in cases of CDH that may be used even in fetal medicine centers with a small caseload. However, our results also suggest that LHR measurement may be difficult to perform correctly. Therefore, appropriate training should be offered to professionals.
Authors: Augusto Zani; Wendy K Chung; Jan Deprest; Matthew T Harting; Tim Jancelewicz; Shaun M Kunisaki; Neil Patel; Lina Antounians; Pramod S Puligandla; Richard Keijzer Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Joseph Davidson; Alena Uus; Alexia Egloff; Milou van Poppel; Jacqueline Matthew; Johannes Steinweg; Maria Deprez; Michael Aertsen; Jan Deprest; Mary Rutherford Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 3.242