Literature DB >> 28295461

What do UK medical students value most in their careers? A discrete choice experiment.

Jennifer A Cleland1, Peter Johnston2, Verity Watson3, Nicolas Krucien3, Diane Skåtun3.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Many individual- and job-related factors are known to influence medical careers decision making. Previous research has extensively studied medical trainees' (residents') and students' views of the factors that are important. However, how trainees and students trade off these factors at times of important careers-related decision making is under-researched. Information about trade-offs is crucial to the development of effective policies to enhance the recruitment and retention of junior doctors.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate the strength of UK medical students' preferences for the characteristics of training posts in terms of monetary value.
METHODS: We distributed a paper questionnaire that included a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to final-year medical students in six diverse medical schools across the UK. The main outcome measure was the monetary value of training post characteristics, based on willingness to forgo and willingness to accept extra income for a change in each job characteristic calculated from regression coefficients.
RESULTS: A total of 810 medical students answered the questionnaire. The presence of good working conditions was by far the most influential characteristic of a training position. Medical students consider that, as newly graduated doctors, they will require compensation of an additional 43.68% above average earnings to move from a post with excellent working conditions to one with poor working conditions. Female students value excellent working conditions more highly than male students, whereas older medical students value them less highly than younger students.
CONCLUSIONS: Students on the point of completing medical school and starting postgraduate training value good working conditions significantly more than they value desirable geographical location, unit reputation, familiarity with the unit or opportunities for partners or spouses. This intelligence can be used to address the crisis in workforce staffing that has developed in the UK and opens up fruitful areas for future research across contexts and in terms of examining stated preferences versus actual career-related behaviour.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28295461     DOI: 10.1111/medu.13257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  13 in total

1.  What factors are critical to attracting NHS foundation doctors into specialty or core training? A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Gillian Marion Scanlan; Jennifer Cleland; Peter Johnston; Kim Walker; Nicolas Krucien; Diane Skåtun
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Does perceived organisational support influence career intentions? The qualitative stories shared by UK early career doctors.

Authors:  Gillian Marion Scanlan; Jennifer Cleland; Kim Walker; Peter Johnston
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Medical career expectations of academically talented high school students: a nationwide cross-sectional study in China.

Authors:  Hongbin Wu; Leisi Pei; Shan Li; Cheng Jiang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Job preferences for medical students in China: A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Shimeng Liu; Shunping Li; Renyong Yang; Tongtong Liu; Gang Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Why UK medical students change career preferences: an interview study.

Authors:  Amit Singh; Hugh Alberti
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2020-12-23

6.  How do workplaces, working practices and colleagues affect UK doctors' career decisions? A qualitative study of junior doctors' career decision making in the UK.

Authors:  Sharon Spooner; Emma Pearson; Jonathan Gibson; Kath Checkland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Relationship between sociodemographic factors and selection into UK postgraduate medical training programmes: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Ben Kumwenda; Jennifer A Cleland; Gordon J Prescott; Kim Walker; Peter W Johnston
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  To select or be selected - gendered experiences in clinical training affect medical students' specialty preferences.

Authors:  Emelie Kristoffersson; Saima Diderichsen; Petra Verdonk; Toine Lagro-Janssen; Katarina Hamberg; Jenny Andersson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Job preferences for healthcare administration students in China: A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Shimeng Liu; Shunping Li; Yujia Li; Haipeng Wang; Jingjing Zhao; Gang Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  "You can't always get what you want…": economic thinking, constrained optimization and health professions education.

Authors:  J A Cleland; J Foo; D Ilic; S Maloney; Y You
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.