| Literature DB >> 28295421 |
Sjors A Koppes1,2, Suzana Ljubojević Hadžavdić3, Ivone Jakasa4, Nika Franceschi5, Christoph Riethmüller6, Ružica Jurakić Tončic3, Branka Marinovic3, Nidhin Raj7, Anthony V Rawlings7, Rainer Voegeli8, Majella E Lane7, Marek Haftek9, Monique H W Frings-Dresen1, Thomas Rustemeyer2, Sanja Kezic1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is known to cause a decrease in the stratum corneum level of natural moisturizing factor (NMF), which in itself is associated with changes in corneocyte surface topography.Entities:
Keywords: Dermal Texture Index; allergic contact dermatitis; irritant contact dermatitis; natural moisturizing factor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28295421 PMCID: PMC5836858 DOI: 10.1111/cod.12770
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contact Dermatitis ISSN: 0105-1873 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1The difference in the natural moisturizing factor levels (ΔNMF) between the skin sites tested with potassium dichromate (Cr), nickel sulfate (Ni), methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/methylisothiazolinone (MI) or p‐phenylenediamine (PPD), sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), unpatched skin and their corresponding pet. controls on day 3. The individual patch test readings for each allergen are inserted as a table. As some patients had positive reactions to two allergens, the number of reactions (n = 34) is greater than the number of patients (n = 27). The ΔNMF of a positive reaction is indicated by a circle symbol, and that of a non‐responder is indicated by a ‘X’ symbol. Non‐responders were excluded from data analysis. The results are shown as mean of all subjects and standard deviation. The data of allergens, SLS and unpatched skin were compared with those of their corresponding pet. patches by use of a paired, two‐tailed t‐test. ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 2The Dermal Texture Index (DTI; number of circular nanosize objects per 20‐µm2 area) measured in the stratum corneum collected on day 3. The results are averaged for all subjects, and are shown as mean values and standard deviation. The number of tested sites per group differed: Cr, n = 3; Ni, n = 5; methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/methylisothiazolinone (MI), n = 4; p‐phenylenediamine (PPD), n = 3; sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), n = 6; pet., n = 7; and unpatched, n = 4. The DTI values of allergens/pet./unpatched skin were compared with those of the SLS group; asterisks indicate level of significance. ** p < 0.01 (one‐way anova followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons test).
Figure 3(a–g) Atomic force microscopy images from stratum corneum samples collected on day 3. (a) Chromium. (b) Nickel. (c) p‐Phenylenediamine. (d) Methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/methylisothiazolinone (MI). (e) Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS). (f) Pet. (g) SLS, close‐up. Images are three‐dimensional representations; the brightness corresponds to the height of the imaged structures. At the microscale (70 × 70 µm2), distinct morphological changes are seen for MCI/MI and SLS. On a close‐up view of an SLS sample (20 × 20 µm2) (g), circular nanosize objects can be distinguished on the corneocyte surface.
Figure 4Scanning electron microscopy images of corneocytes on day 3 after application of pet. (a), methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/methylisothiazolinone (MI) (b) and sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) at ×1350 magnification. Note a loose lateral association between the cells for the MCI/MI and the SLS test sites. Furthermore, circular nanosize objects can be distinguished on the corneocyte surface of the SLS test site.
Figure 5Activities of bleomycin hydrolase (a), calpain‐1 (b) and plasmin (c) in the stratum corneum samples of the skin sites tested with Ni (n = 4), methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/methylisothiazolinone (MI) (n = 4), sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) (n = 8) and their corresponding pet. controls (n = 8) and unpatched test sites (n = 8). Data for bleomycin hydrolase are shown as median with interquartile range; those for calpain‐1 (b) and plasmin (c) are shown as mean ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; (a) Wilcoxon signed rank test; (b, c), paired two‐sided t‐test).