Linda O Nichols1,2, Jennifer Martindale-Adams1,3, Carolyn W Zhu4,5, Erin K Kaplan6, Jeffrey K Zuber1,3, Teresa M Waters3. 1. Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee. 2. Departments of Preventive Medicine and Internal Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee. 3. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee. 4. Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 5. Geriatric Resarch Education Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York. 6. Department of Economics, Rhodes College, Memphis, Tennessee.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Examine caregiver and care recipient healthcare costs associated with caregivers' participation in Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregivers Health (REACH II or REACH VA) behavioral interventions to improve coping skills and care recipient management. DESIGN: RCT (REACH II); propensity-score matched, retrospective cohort study (REACH VA). SETTING: Five community sites (REACH II); 24 VA facilities (REACH VA). PARTICIPANTS: Care recipients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) and their caregivers who participated in REACH II study (analysis sample of 110 caregivers and 197 care recipients); care recipients whose caregivers participated in REACH VA and a propensity matched control group (analysis sample of 491). MEASUREMENTS: Previously collected data plus Medicare expenditures (REACH II) and VA costs plus Medicare expenditures (REACH VA). RESULTS: There was no increase in VA or Medicare expenditures for care recipients or their caregivers who participated in either REACH intervention. For VA care recipients, REACH was associated with significantly lower total VA costs of care (33.6%). VA caregiver cost data was not available. CONCLUSION: In previous research, both REACH II and REACH VA have been shown to provide benefit for dementia caregivers at a cost of less than $5/day; however, concerns about additional healthcare costs may have hindered REACH's widespread adoption. Neither REACH intervention was associated with additional healthcare costs for caregivers or patients; in fact, for VA patients, there were significantly lower healthcare costs. The VA costs savings may be related to the addition of a structured format for addressing the caregiver's role in managing complex ADRD care to an existing, integrated care system. These findings suggest that behavioral interventions are a viable mechanism to support burdened dementia caregivers without additional healthcare costs.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Examine caregiver and care recipient healthcare costs associated with caregivers' participation in Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregivers Health (REACH II or REACH VA) behavioral interventions to improve coping skills and care recipient management. DESIGN: RCT (REACH II); propensity-score matched, retrospective cohort study (REACH VA). SETTING: Five community sites (REACH II); 24 VA facilities (REACH VA). PARTICIPANTS: Care recipients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) and their caregivers who participated in REACH II study (analysis sample of 110 caregivers and 197 care recipients); care recipients whose caregivers participated in REACH VA and a propensity matched control group (analysis sample of 491). MEASUREMENTS: Previously collected data plus Medicare expenditures (REACH II) and VA costs plus Medicare expenditures (REACH VA). RESULTS: There was no increase in VA or Medicare expenditures for care recipients or their caregivers who participated in either REACH intervention. For VA care recipients, REACH was associated with significantly lower total VA costs of care (33.6%). VA caregiver cost data was not available. CONCLUSION: In previous research, both REACH II and REACH VA have been shown to provide benefit for dementia caregivers at a cost of less than $5/day; however, concerns about additional healthcare costs may have hindered REACH's widespread adoption. Neither REACH intervention was associated with additional healthcare costs for caregivers or patients; in fact, for VA patients, there were significantly lower healthcare costs. The VA costs savings may be related to the addition of a structured format for addressing the caregiver's role in managing complex ADRD care to an existing, integrated care system. These findings suggest that behavioral interventions are a viable mechanism to support burdened dementia caregivers without additional healthcare costs.
Authors: Steven H Belle; Louis Burgio; Robert Burns; David Coon; Sara J Czaja; Dolores Gallagher-Thompson; Laura N Gitlin; Julie Klinger; Kathy Mann Koepke; Chin Chin Lee; Jennifer Martindale-Adams; Linda Nichols; Richard Schulz; Sidney Stahl; Alan Stevens; Laraine Winter; Song Zhang Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Teresa M Waters; Cyril F Chang; William T Cecil; Panagiotis Kasteridis; David Mirvis Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Thomas Edes; Bruce Kinosian; Nancy H Vuckovic; Linda Olivia Nichols; Margaret Mary Becker; Monir Hossain Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jennifer L Wolff; Lauren H Nicholas; Amber Willink; John Mulcahy; Karen Davis; Judith D Kasper Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Linda O Nichols; Jennifer Martindale-Adams; Carolyn W Zhu; Erin K Kaplan; Jeffrey K Zuber; Jessica Lum; Teresa M Waters Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Yingjia Chen; Leslie Wilson; John Kornak; R Adams Dudley; Jennifer Merrilees; Stephen J Bonasera; Christie M Byrne; Kirby Lee; Winston Chiong; Bruce L Miller; Katherine L Possin Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Brenda C Spillman; Vicki A Freedman; Judith D Kasper; Jennifer L Wolff Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Nicholas T Bott; Clifford C Sheckter; Daniel Yang; Stephanie Peters; Brian Brady; Scooter Plowman; Soo Borson; Bruce Leff; Robert M Kaplan; Terry Platchek; Arnold Milstein Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Anne K Schwabenbauer; Cynthia M Knight; Nicole Downing; Michelle Morreale-Karl; Michelle E Mlinac Journal: Fam Syst Health Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 1.569
Authors: Mairead M Bartley; Laura Suarez; Reem M A Shafi; Joshua M Baruth; Amanda J M Benarroch; Maria I Lapid Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2018-06-23 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Claire Godard-Sebillotte; Mélanie Le Berre; Tibor Schuster; Miguel Trottier; Isabelle Vedel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 3.240