| Literature DB >> 28295023 |
Zi-Wu Guo1, Jun-Jing Hu2, Shuang-Lin Chen1, Ying-Chun Li1, Qing-Ping Yang1, Han-Jiang Cai3.
Abstract
Water and nitrogen are two of the most important factors for plant growth and development. However, little is known about effects of N on water translocation between connected bamboo ramets. We performed experiment connected Indocalamus decorus ramets in adjacent pots with different soil water contents and three N levels. We determined antioxidase activities, concentration of osmotic adjustment products, O2·-, MDA and photosynthetic pigments, and electrolyte leakage rate in paired unit. When N supply to supporting ramets increased, their electrolyte leakage rates and contents of O2·- and MDA significantly increased, while antioxidase activities and contents of osmotic adjustment products and photosynthetic pigments in connected dependent ramets increased markedly as their electrolyte leakage rates and contents of O2·- and MDA decreased greatly. When N addition to dependent ramets increased, antioxidant enzyme activity and contents of osmotic adjustment products and photosynthetic pigments decreased in both ramets, but electrolyte leakage rates and O2·- and MDA contents increased significantly. Therefore, N addition to either supporting or dependent ramets can improve water integration among I. decorus ramets. N addition to supporting ramets promotes water translocation and alleviates water stress of dependent ramets, but N addition to dependent ramets exacerbates drought stress damage to dependent ramets.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28295023 PMCID: PMC5353745 DOI: 10.1038/srep44524
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Summary statistics of repeated-measures ANOVA on leaf physiological indices in Indocalamus decorus ramets subjected to different experimental treatments.
| Ramets | Experimental indexes | N addition (N) | Treatment time (T) | N × T | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supporting ramets | CAT activity | 353.728 | <0.001 | 1328.062 | <0.001 | 77.112 | <0.001 |
| POD activity | 809.311 | <0.001 | 472.057 | <0.001 | 75.454 | <0.001 | |
| SOD activity | 66.921 | <0.001 | 876.207 | <0.001 | 21.519 | <0.001 | |
| MDA content | 83.459 | <0.001 | 4409.362 | <0.001 | 27.488 | <0.001 | |
| Electrolyte leakage rate | 187.259 | <0.001 | 1014.631 | <0.001 | 13.263 | <0.001 | |
| O2·− content | 110.696 | <0.001 | 4033.953 | <0.001 | 31.821 | <0.001 | |
| Chlorophyll a content | 251.972 | <0.001 | 460.295 | <0.001 | 25.560 | <0.001 | |
| Chlorophyll b content | 184.859 | <0.001 | 652.175 | <0.001 | 17.630 | <0.001 | |
| Carotenoid content | 480.746 | <0.001 | 2295.335 | <0.001 | 39.227 | <0.001 | |
| Soluble protein content | 682.126 | <0.001 | 7589.709 | <0.001 | 98.848 | <0.001 | |
| Total soluble sugar content | 310.632 | <0.001 | 3084.207 | <0.001 | 26.040 | <0.001 | |
| Dependent ramets | CAT activity | 449.792 | <0.001 | 2173.230 | <0.001 | 20.248 | <0.001 |
| POD activity | 136.000 | <0.001 | 1567.656 | <0.001 | 71.936 | <0.001 | |
| SOD activity | 63.512 | <0.001 | 611.218 | <0.001 | 22.155 | <0.001 | |
| MDA content | 203.585 | <0.001 | 10364.242 | <0.001 | 39.409 | <0.001 | |
| Electrolyte leakage rate | 94.621 | <0.001 | 457.825 | <0.001 | 17.897 | <0.001 | |
| O2·− content | 150.692 | <0.001 | 4160.150 | <0.001 | 43.367 | <0.001 | |
| Chlorophyll a content | 319.466 | <0.001 | 933.925 | <0.001 | 35.483 | <0.001 | |
| Chlorophyll b content | 205.963 | <0.001 | 475.624 | <0.001 | 6.492 | <0.001 | |
| Carotenoid content | 195.133 | <0.001 | 1381.246 | <0.001 | 51.281 | <0.001 | |
| Soluble protein content | 264.448 | <0.001 | 5750.398 | <0.001 | 39.162 | <0.001 | |
| Total soluble sugar content | 103.246 | <0.001 | 1411.071 | <0.001 | 9.913 | <0.001 | |
See legend to Fig. 1 for an explanation of treatment.
Figure 1Leaf antioxidant enzyme activities of Indocalamus decorus ramets subjected to different experimental treatments (units of enzyme activity are U g−1 FW).
*H1 and L1 refer to supporting ramets and dependent ramets in the 0N:1N treatment, respectively; H2 and L2 refer to supporting ramets and dependent ramets in the 0N:2N treatment, respectively; H3 and L3 refer to supporting ramets and dependent ramets in the 1N:0N treatment, respectively; H4 and L4 refer to supporting ramets and dependent ramets in the 1N:2N treatment, respectively; H5 and L5 refer to supporting ramets and dependent ramets in the 2N:0N treatment, respectively; H6 and L6 refer to supporting ramets and dependent ramets in the 2N:1N treatment, respectively. The pots were subjected to three levels of N fertilisation: 0N (no N addition), 1N (15 g urea pot−1), and 2N level (30 g urea pot−1). The two pots in which each of the connected pairs of ramets were grown were subjected to a range of N treatments (pairwise: 0N:1N, 0N:2N, 1N:2N, 1N:0N, 2N:0N, and 2N:1N). Different letters in the bars indicate significant pairwise differences among different N addition treatments.
Figure 2Leaf electrolyte leakage rate (%), contents of malondialdehyde (MDA, μmol l−1), and reactive oxygen species content (μmol min−1 mg−1) of Indocalamus decorus ramets subjected to different experimental treatments.
See legend to Fig. 1 for an explanation of treatments.
Figure 3Leaf photosynthetic pigment contents (mg g−1) in Indocalamus decorus ramets subjected to different water potentials.
See legend to Fig. 1 for an explanation of treatments.
Figure 4Leaf relative soluble protein and soluble sugar contents (mg g−1) in Indocalamus decorus ramets subjected to different experimental treatments.
See legend to Fig. 1 for an explanation of treatments.