Rebecca McKetin1,2, Louisa Degenhardt2, Marian Shanahan2, Amanda L Baker3, Nicole K Lee1, Dan I Lubman4. 1. National Drug Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. 2. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 3. School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia. 4. Turning Point, Eastern Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
AIM AND BACKGROUND: We estimated health service utilisation attributable to methamphetamine use, its national impact and examined other predictors of health service utilisation among dependent methamphetamine users. METHOD: Past year rates of health service utilisation (number of attendances for general hospitals, psychiatric hospitals, emergency departments, general practitioners, psychiatrists, counsellors or psychologists, and dentists) were estimated for three levels of methamphetamine use (no use, < weekly, ≥ weekly) using panel data from a longitudinal cohort of 484 dependent methamphetamine users from Sydney and Brisbane, Australia. Marginal rates for methamphetamine use were multiplied by 2013 prevalence estimates from the National Drug Strategy Household Survey. Covariates included other substance use, demographics, mental disorders and drug treatment. FINDINGS: Health service use was high. More frequent methamphetamine use was associated with more frequent presentations to emergency departments (incidence rate ratios 1.3-2.1) and psychiatric hospitals (incidence rate ratios 5.3-8.3) and fewer presentations to general practitioners, dentists and counsellors. We estimate methamphetamine use accounted for between 28 400 and 80 900 additional psychiatric hospital admissions and 29 700 and 151 800 additional emergency department presentations in 2013. More frequent presentations to these services were also associated with alcohol and opioid use, comorbid mental health disorders, unemployment, unstable housing, attending drug treatment, low income and lower education. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent methamphetamine use has a significant impact on emergency medical and psychiatric services. Better provision of non-acute health care services to address the multiple health and social needs of dependent methamphetamine users may reduce the burden on these acute care services. [McKetin R, Degenhardt L, Shanahan M, Baker AL, Lee NK, Lubman DI. Health service utilisation attributable to methamphetamine use in Australia: patterns, predictors and national impact. Drug Alcohol Rev 2017;00:000-000].
AIM AND BACKGROUND: We estimated health service utilisation attributable to methamphetamine use, its national impact and examined other predictors of health service utilisation among dependent methamphetamine users. METHOD: Past year rates of health service utilisation (number of attendances for general hospitals, psychiatric hospitals, emergency departments, general practitioners, psychiatrists, counsellors or psychologists, and dentists) were estimated for three levels of methamphetamine use (no use, < weekly, ≥ weekly) using panel data from a longitudinal cohort of 484 dependent methamphetamine users from Sydney and Brisbane, Australia. Marginal rates for methamphetamine use were multiplied by 2013 prevalence estimates from the National Drug Strategy Household Survey. Covariates included other substance use, demographics, mental disorders and drug treatment. FINDINGS: Health service use was high. More frequent methamphetamine use was associated with more frequent presentations to emergency departments (incidence rate ratios 1.3-2.1) and psychiatric hospitals (incidence rate ratios 5.3-8.3) and fewer presentations to general practitioners, dentists and counsellors. We estimate methamphetamine use accounted for between 28 400 and 80 900 additional psychiatric hospital admissions and 29 700 and 151 800 additional emergency department presentations in 2013. More frequent presentations to these services were also associated with alcohol and opioid use, comorbid mental health disorders, unemployment, unstable housing, attending drug treatment, low income and lower education. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent methamphetamine use has a significant impact on emergency medical and psychiatric services. Better provision of non-acute health care services to address the multiple health and social needs of dependent methamphetamine users may reduce the burden on these acute care services. [McKetin R, Degenhardt L, Shanahan M, Baker AL, Lee NK, Lubman DI. Health service utilisation attributable to methamphetamine use in Australia: patterns, predictors and national impact. Drug Alcohol Rev 2017;00:000-000].
Authors: Michael C Otterstatter; Alexis Crabtree; Sabina Dobrer; Brooke Kinniburgh; Salman Klar; Anthony Leamon; Jennifer May-Hadford; Christopher Mill; Mina Park; Andrew W Tu; Lu Zheng Journal: Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laura MacDougall; Kate Smolina; Michael Otterstatter; Bin Zhao; Mei Chong; David Godfrey; Ali Mussavi-Rizi; Jenny Sutherland; Margot Kuo; Perry Kendall Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Clarissa Giebel; Jason Cameron McIntyre; Konstantinos Daras; Mark Gabbay; Jennifer Downing; Munir Pirmohamed; Fran Walker; Wojciech Sawicki; Ana Alfirevic; Ben Barr Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-01-06 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Shalini Arunogiri; Antonio Verdejo-Garcia; Rebecca McKetin; Adam J Rubenis; Rebecca E Fitzpatrick; Dan I Lubman Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2019-12-13 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Joshua B B Garfield; Hugh Piercy; Shalini Arunogiri; Dan I Lubman; Samuel C Campbell; Paul G Sanfilippo; Jeff Gavin; Malcolm Hopwood; Eli Kotler; Suzanne George; Goke Okedara; Lara R Piccoli; Victoria Manning Journal: Trials Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 2.279