Literature DB >> 28294097

More tail lesions among undocked than tail docked pigs in a conventional herd.

H P Lahrmann1, M E Busch1, R B D'Eath2, B Forkman3, C F Hansen3.   

Abstract

The vast majority of piglets reared in the European Union (EU) and worldwide is tail docked to reduce the risk of being tail bitten, even though EU animal welfare legislation bans routine tail docking. Many conventional herds experience low levels of tail biting among tail docked pigs, however it is not known, what the prevalence would have been had the pigs not been tail docked. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of tail lesions between docked and undocked pigs in a conventional piggery in Denmark with very low prevalence of tail biting among tail docked pigs. The study included 1922 DanAvl Duroc×(Landrace×Large White) female and castrated male pigs (962 docked and 960 undocked). Docked and undocked pigs were housed under the same conditions in the same room but in separate pens with 20 (±0.03) pigs/pen. Pigs had ad libitum access to commercial diets in a feed dispenser. Manipulable material in the form of chopped straw was provided daily on the floor (~10 g/pig per day), and each pen had two vertically placed soft wood boards. From weaning to slaughter, tail wounds (injury severity and freshness) were scored every 2nd week. No clinical signs of injured tails were observed within the tail docked group, whereas 23.0% of the undocked pigs got a tail lesion. On average, 4.0% of the pigs with undocked tails had a tail lesion on tail inspection days. More pens with tail lesions were observed among pigs weighing 30 to 60 kg (34.3%; P<0.05) than in pens with pigs weighing 7 to 30 kg (13.0%) and 60 to 90 kg (12.8%). Removal of pigs to a hospital pen was more likely in undocked pens (P<0.05, 47.7% undocked pens and 22.9% docked pens). Finally, abattoir meat inspection data revealed more tail biting remarks in undocked pigs (P<0.001). In conclusion, this study suggests that housing pigs with intact tails in conventional herds with very low prevalence of tail biting among tail docked pigs, will increase the prevalence of pigs with tail lesions considerably, and pig producers will need more hospital pens. Abattoir data indicate that tail biting remarks from meat inspection data severely underestimate on-farm prevalence of tail lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behaviour; housing; pigs; tail biting; tail docking

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28294097     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731117000490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  14 in total

1.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

2.  'Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities'.

Authors:  Nancy De Briyne; Charlotte Berg; Thomas Blaha; Andreas Palzer; Déborah Temple
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2018-11-16

3.  Producer Perceptions of the Prevention of Tail Biting on UK Farms: Association to Bedding Use and Tail Removal Proportion.

Authors:  Anna Valros; Claire Barber
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 4.  The Importance of the Social Sciences in Reducing Tail Biting Prevalence in Pigs.

Authors:  Grace A Carroll; Jenny M Groarke
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  A High Enrichment Replenishment Rate Reduces Damaging Behaviors and Increases Growth Rate in Undocked Pigs Kept in Fully Slatted Pens.

Authors:  Jen-Yun Chou; Dale A Sandercock; Rick B D'Eath; Keelin O'Driscoll
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-11-13

6.  Evaluation of Tail Lesions of Finishing Pigs at the Slaughterhouse: Associations With Herd-Level Observations.

Authors:  Mari Heinonen; Elina Välimäki; Anne-Maija Laakkonen; Ina Toppari; Johannes Vugts; Emma Fàbrega; Anna Valros
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-07-15

7.  Associations between Antibacterial Treatment and the Prevalence of Tail-Biting-Related Sequelae in Danish Finishers at Slaughter.

Authors:  Mette Fertner; Matt Denwood; Anna Camilla Birkegård; Helle Stege; Anette Boklund
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-11-01

8.  Automatic early warning of tail biting in pigs: 3D cameras can detect lowered tail posture before an outbreak.

Authors:  Richard B D'Eath; Mhairi Jack; Agnieszka Futro; Darren Talbot; Qiming Zhu; David Barclay; Emma M Baxter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Irish pig farmer's perceptions and experiences of tail and ear biting.

Authors:  Amy Haigh; Keelin O'Driscoll
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2019-12-17

10.  Can increased dietary fibre level and a single enrichment device reduce the risk of tail biting in undocked growing-finishing pigs in fully slatted systems?

Authors:  Jen-Yun Chou; Keelin O'Driscoll; Dale A Sandercock; Rick B D'Eath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.