Amy Tyler1,2, Lisa McLeod3,2,4, Brenda Beaty4, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga2,4, Meghan Birkholz3, Daniel Hyman3,2, Allison Kempe3,2,4, James Todd3,2, Amanda F Dempsey3,2,4. 1. Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado; amy.tyler@childrenscolorado.org. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado; and. 3. Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado. 4. Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, Colorado.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Croup is a clinical diagnosis, and the available evidence suggests that, except in rare cases, ancillary testing, such as radiologic imaging, is not helpful. Given the paucity of inpatient-specific evidence for croup care, we hypothesized that there would be marked variability in the use of not routinely indicated resources (NRIRs). Our primary study objective was to describe the variation and predictors of variation in the use of NRIRs. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that used the Pediatric Health Information System database of generally healthy inpatients with croup aged 6 months to 15 years who were admitted between January 1, 2012 and September 30, 2014. We measured variability in the use of NRIRs: chest and lateral neck radiographs, viral testing, parenteral steroids, and antibiotics. Risk-adjusted analysis was used to compare resource utilization adjusted for hospital-specific effects and average case mix. RESULTS: The cohort included 26 hospitals and 6236 patients with a median age of 18 months. Nine percent of patients required intensive care services, and 3% had a 30-day readmission for croup. We found marked variability in adjusted and unadjusted utilization across hospitals for all resources. In the risk-adjusted analysis, hospital-specific effects rather than patient characteristics were the main predictor of variability in the use of NRIRs. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an up to fivefold difference in NRIR utilization attributable to hospital-level practice variability in inpatient croup care. This study highlights a need for inpatient-specific evidence and quality-improvement interventions to reduce unnecessary utilization and to improve patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Croup is a clinical diagnosis, and the available evidence suggests that, except in rare cases, ancillary testing, such as radiologic imaging, is not helpful. Given the paucity of inpatient-specific evidence for croup care, we hypothesized that there would be marked variability in the use of not routinely indicated resources (NRIRs). Our primary study objective was to describe the variation and predictors of variation in the use of NRIRs. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that used the Pediatric Health Information System database of generally healthy inpatients with croup aged 6 months to 15 years who were admitted between January 1, 2012 and September 30, 2014. We measured variability in the use of NRIRs: chest and lateral neck radiographs, viral testing, parenteral steroids, and antibiotics. Risk-adjusted analysis was used to compare resource utilization adjusted for hospital-specific effects and average case mix. RESULTS: The cohort included 26 hospitals and 6236 patients with a median age of 18 months. Nine percent of patients required intensive care services, and 3% had a 30-day readmission for croup. We found marked variability in adjusted and unadjusted utilization across hospitals for all resources. In the risk-adjusted analysis, hospital-specific effects rather than patient characteristics were the main predictor of variability in the use of NRIRs. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an up to fivefold difference in NRIR utilization attributable to hospital-level practice variability in inpatient croup care. This study highlights a need for inpatient-specific evidence and quality-improvement interventions to reduce unnecessary utilization and to improve patient outcomes.
Authors: Haejin In; Bridget A Neville; Stuart R Lipsitz; Katherine A Corso; Jane C Weeks; Caprice C Greenberg Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Mark I Neuman; Matt Hall; Adam L Hersh; Thomas V Brogan; Kavita Parikh; Jason G Newland; Anne J Blaschke; Derek J Williams; Carlos G Grijalva; Amy Tyler; Samir S Shah Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: David Donaldson; David Poleski; Eric Knipple; Kurt Filips; Linda Reetz; Rebecca G Pascual; Raymond E Jackson Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Anna Sofi Asmundsson; Joseph Arms; Rahul Kaila; Mark G Roback; Carly Theiler; Cynthia S Davey; Jeffrey P Louie Journal: Hosp Pediatr Date: 2019-05
Authors: Amy Tyler; Mersine A Bryan; Chuan Zhou; Rita Mangione-Smith; Derek Williams; David P Johnson; Chén C Kenyon; Irit Rasooly; Hannah C Neubauer; Karen M Wilson Journal: Hosp Pediatr Date: 2022-01-01
Authors: Michael J Tchou; Matt Hall; Samir S Shah; David P Johnson; Alan R Schroeder; James W Antoon; Marquita C Genies; Ricardo Quinonez; Christopher W Miller; Snehal P Shah; Patrick W Brady Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 9.703
Authors: Youn Young Choi; You Sun Kim; Seong Yong Lee; Jiwoo Sim; Young June Choe; Mi Seon Han Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 5.354
Authors: Mersine A Bryan; Annika M Hofstetter; M Patricia deHart; Tamara D Simon; Douglas J Opel Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 7.124