Literature DB >> 28292614

Embryo transfer simulation improves pregnancy rates and decreases time to proficiency in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility fellow embryo transfers.

Ryan J Heitmann1, Micah J Hill2, John M Csokmay3, Justin Pilgrim2, Alan H DeCherney4, Shad Deering5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To design and evaluate an ET simulator to train Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (REI) fellows' techniques of ET.
DESIGN: Simulation model development and retrospective cohort analysis.
SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Patients undergoing IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Simulation model evaluation and implementation of ET simulation training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): The REI fellow and faculty evaluation responses (n = 19/21 [90%]) of the model demonstrated realistic characteristics, with evaluators concluding the model was suitable for training in almost all evaluated areas. A total of 12 REI fellows who performed ET were analyzed: 6 before ET trainer and 6 after ET trainer. Pregnancy rates were 31% in the initial 10 ETs per fellow before simulator vs. 46% after simulator. One of six pre-ET trainer fellows (17%) had pregnancy rates ≥40% in their first 10 ETs; whereas four of six post-ET trainer fellows had pregnancy rates ≥40% in their first 10 ETs. The average number of ETs to obtain >40% pregnancy efficiency was 27 ETs before trainer vs. 15 ETs after trainer. Pregnancy rates were similar in the two groups after 20 ETs, and collective terminal pregnancy rates were >50% after 40 ETs. CONCLUSION(S): Embryo transfer simulation improved REI fellow pregnancy rates in their first 10 transfers and led to a more rapid ET proficiency. These data suggest potential value in adopting ET simulation, even in programs with a robust history of live ET in fellowship training. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embryo transfer; fellowship education; medical simulation training; model development; pregnancy rates

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28292614      PMCID: PMC6555143          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  24 in total

1.  Training of providers in embryo transfer: what is the minimum number of transfers required for proficiency?

Authors:  T C Papageorgiou; R M Hearns-Stokes; M P Leondires; B T Miller; P Chakraborty; D Cruess; J Segars
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  The degree of difficulty of embryo transfer is an independent factor for predicting pregnancy.

Authors:  Candido Tomás; Kimmo Tikkinen; Leena Tuomivaara; Juha S Tapanainen; Hannu Martikainen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Physician experience in performing embryo transfers may affect outcome.

Authors:  Asli Uyar; Ayse Bener; H Nadir Ciray; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Role of embryo transfer in fellowship training.

Authors:  Michael D Wittenberger; William H Catherino; Alicia Y Armstrong
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Additional training with an obstetric simulator improves medical student comfort with basic procedures.

Authors:  Shad H Deering; Jonathan G Hodor; Michele Wylen; Sarah Poggi; Peter E Nielsen; Andrew J Satin
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.929

6.  Impact of the "physician factor" on pregnancy rates in a large assisted reproductive technology program: do too many cooks spoil the broth?

Authors:  V C Karande; R Morris; C Chapman; J Rinehart; N Gleicher
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Pregnancy rates after embryo transfer depend on the provider at embryo transfer.

Authors:  R M Hearns-Stokes; B T Miller; L Scott; D Creuss; P K Chakraborty; J H Segars
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Embryo afterloading: a refinement in embryo transfer technique that may increase clinical pregnancy.

Authors:  Adrienne B Neithardt; James H Segars; Sasha Hennessy; Aidita N James; Jeffrey L McKeeby
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  The efficacy of the embryo transfer catheter in IVF and ICSI is operator-dependent: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Zhan Yao; Stijn Vansteelandt; Josiane Van der Elst; Tom Coetsier; Marc Dhont; Petra De Sutter
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  The presence of blood in the transfer catheter negatively influences outcome at embryo transfer.

Authors:  R Alvero; R M Hearns-Stokes; W H Catherino; M P Leondires; J H Segars
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  1 in total

1.  Public reporting of IVF outcomes influences medical decision-making and physician training.

Authors:  Stephanie Gunderson; Emily S Jungheim; Caleb B Kallen; Kenan Omurtag
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2020-02-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.