Literature DB >> 28291963

In Vitro Cell Death Discrimination and Screening Method by Simple and Cost-Effective Viability Analysis.

Katharina Helm, Marlena Beyreis, Christian Mayr, Markus Ritter, Martin Jakab, Tobias Kiesslich, Kristjan Plaetzer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: For in vitro cytotoxicity testing, discrimination of apoptosis and necrosis represents valuable information. Viability analysis performed at two different time points post treatment could serve such a purpose because the dynamics of metabolic activity of apoptotic and necrotic cells is different, i.e. a more rapid decline of cellular metabolism during necrosis whereas cellular metabolism is maintained during the entire execution phase of apoptosis. This study describes a straightforward approach to distinguish apoptosis and necrosis.
METHODS: A431 human epidermoid carcinoma cells were treated with different concentrations/doses of actinomycin D (Act-D), 4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-2-azabenzimidazole (TBB), Ro 31-8220, H2O2 and photodynamic treatment (PDT). The resazurin viability signal was recorded at 2 and 24 hrs post treatment. Apoptosis and necrosis were verified by measuring caspase 3/7 and membrane integrity.
RESULTS: Calculation of the difference curve between the 2 and 24 hrs resazurin signals yields the following information: a positive difference signal indicates apoptosis (i.e. high metabolic activity at early time points and low signal at 24 hrs post treatment) while an early reduction of the viability signal indicates necrosis. For all treatments, this dose-dependent sequence of cellular responses could be confirmed by independent assays.
CONCLUSION: Simple and cost-effective viability analysis provides reliable information about the dose ranges of a cytotoxic agent where apoptosis or necrosis occurs. This may serve as a starting point for further in-depth characterisation of cytotoxic treatments.
© 2017 The Author(s)Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apoptosis; Cell death; Cytotoxicity; Necrosis; Viability analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28291963     DOI: 10.1159/000460910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Physiol Biochem        ISSN: 1015-8987


  6 in total

1.  Selective Cytotoxicity to HER2 Positive Breast Cancer Cells by Saporin-Loaded Nanobody-Targeted Polymeric Nanoparticles in Combination with Photochemical Internalization.

Authors:  Lucía Martínez-Jothar; Nataliia Beztsinna; Cornelus F van Nostrum; Wim E Hennink; Sabrina Oliveira
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Unravelling the Biological Potential of Pinus pinaster Bark Extracts.

Authors:  Pedro Ferreira-Santos; Zlatina Genisheva; Cláudia Botelho; Joana Santos; Carla Ramos; José A Teixeira; Cristina M R Rocha
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-20

3.  Acid- and Volume-Sensitive Chloride Currents in Human Chondrocytes.

Authors:  Michael Kittl; Martina Winklmayr; Katharina Helm; Johannes Lettner; Martin Gaisberger; Markus Ritter; Martin Jakab
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-11-13

4.  Biochemical characterization, cytotoxic, antimutagenic, anticancer and molecular docking studies on Tecomella undulata.

Authors:  Sana Riaz; Muhammad Arslan Javed; Iqra Nawaz; Tariq Javed
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.052

5.  Amination of Graphene Oxide Leads to Increased Cytotoxicity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells.

Authors:  Milena Georgieva; Bela Vasileva; Giorgio Speranza; Dayong Wang; Kalin Stoyanov; Milena Draganova-Filipova; Plamen Zagorchev; Victoria Sarafian; George Miloshev; Natalia Krasteva
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Dose-Dependent Cannabidiol-Induced Elevation of Intracellular Calcium and Apoptosis in Human Articular Chondrocytes.

Authors:  Martina Winklmayr; Martin Gaisberger; Michael Kittl; Julia Fuchs; Markus Ritter; Martin Jakab
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.494

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.