Literature DB >> 28291851

Bone Healing Around Dental Implants: Simplified vs Conventional Drilling Protocols at Speed of 400 rpm.

Luiz Fernando Gil, Alvin Sarendranath, Rodrigo Neiva, Heloisa F Marão, Nick Tovar, Estevam A Bonfante, Malvin N Janal, Arthur Castellano, Paulo G Coelho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated whether simplified drilling protocols would provide comparable histologic and histomorphometric results to conventional drilling protocols at a low rotational speed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 alumina-blasted and acid-etched Ti-6Al-4V implants with two diameters (3.75 and 4.2 mm, n = 24 per group) were bilaterally placed in the tibiae of 12 dogs, under a low-speed protocol (400 rpm). Within the same diameter group, half of the implants were inserted after a simplified drilling procedure (pilot drill + final diameter drill), and the other half were placed using the conventional drilling procedure. After 3 and 5 weeks, the animals were euthanized, and the retrieved bone-implant samples were subjected to nondecalcified histologic sectioning. Histomorphology, bone-to-implant contact (BIC), and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) analysis were performed.
RESULTS: Histology showed that new bone was formed around implants, and inflammation or bone resorption was not evident for both groups. Histomorphometrically, when all independent variables were collapsed over drilling technique, no differences were detected for BIC and BAFO; when drilling technique was analyzed as a function of time, the conventional groups reached statistically higher BIC and BAFO at 3 weeks, but comparable values between techniques were observed at 5 weeks; 4.2-mm implants obtained statistically higher BAFO relative to 3.75-mm implants.
CONCLUSION: Based on the present methodology, the conventional technique improved bone formation at 3 weeks, and narrower implants were associated with less bone formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28291851     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  4 in total

Review 1.  Osseodensification - A novel approach in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Umesh Y Pai; Shobha J Rodrigues; Karishma S Talreja; Mahesh Mundathaje
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

2.  Evaluation of implant stability using different implant drilling sequences.

Authors:  Hyeon Min Kim; Jin-Yong Cho; Jaeyoung Ryu
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.080

3.  Histological and Nanomechanical Properties of a New Nanometric Hydroxiapatite Implant Surface. An In Vivo Study in Diabetic Rats.

Authors:  Paula G F P Oliveira; Paulo G Coelho; Edmara T P Bergamo; Lukasz Witek; Cristine A Borges; Fábio B Bezerra; Arthur B Novaes; Sergio L S Souza
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits.

Authors:  Sergio H L Martins; Uislen B Cadore; Arthur B Novaes; Michel R Messora; Bruna Ghiraldini; Fabio J B Bezerra; Daniele Botticelli; Sergio L S de Souza
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-08-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.