Literature DB >> 28291640

Pegylated interferon alfa-2a in patients with essential thrombocythaemia or polycythaemia vera: a post-hoc, median 83 month follow-up of an open-label, phase 2 trial.

Lucia Masarova1, Keyur P Patel2, Kate J Newberry1, Jorge Cortes1, Gautam Borthakur1, Marina Konopleva1, Zeev Estrov1, Hagop Kantarjian1, Srdan Verstovsek3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pegylated interferon alfa-2a is an immunomodulatory agent used to treat polycythemia vera. The durability of responses and long-term safety of this drug in patients with polycythaemia vera and essential thrombocythaemia have not been reported. Here, we present long-term efficacy and safety data from a single-centre, open-label, phase 2 trial, after a median of 83 months follow up.
METHODS: Patients older than 18 years who were diagnosed with essential thrombocythaemia or polycythaemia vera according to 2001 WHO criteria were eligible to enrol in our study. The initial starting dose of pegylated interferon alfa-2a was 450 μg subcutaneously once per week, but was decreased in a stepwise manner due to toxic effects to a final starting dose of 90 mg per week: three patients were started at a dose of 450 mg per week, three at 360 mg per week, 19 at 270 mg per week, 26 at 180 mg per week, and 32 at 90 mg per week. Treatment was continued for as long as the patients derived clinical benefit with reductions in dose and frequency of administration allowed at the discretion of the treating physician. Haematological responses were assessed every 3-6 months on the basis of blood counts as defined by the European LeukemiaNet critieria. The primary endpoint of the initial study was the proportion of patients with a haematological response. Complete haematological response was defined as normalisation of blood counts (for patients with essential thrombocythaemia, platelets ≤440 × 109 per L; for patients with polycythaemia vera, haemoglobin <15·0 g/L without phlebotomy) with complete resolution of palpable splenomegaly or symptoms in the absence of a thrombotic event. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics and in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00452023 and is ongoing but not enrolling new patients.
FINDINGS: Between May 21, 2005, and Dec 1, 2015, patients were followed up for a median of 83 months (IQR 69-94 months). Pegylated interferon alfa-2a induced haematological (66 [80%] of 83 patients) and molecular responses (35 [63%] of 55 patients) in 40 patients with essential thrombocythaemia and 43 patients with polycythaemia vera, with median durations of 66 months (IQR 35-83) and 53 months (24-70), respectively. 26 (39%) of 66 haematological responders and 25 (71%) of 35 molecular responders (with the JAK2 Val617Phe mutation) have maintained some response during follow-up: 49% maintained their best molecular response (nine of ten patients who had a complete response, five of 20 who had a partial response, and three of five who had a minor response). The incidence of major venous-thrombotic events during the study was 1·22 per 100 person-years. Overall, 18 (22%) of 83 patients discontinued therapy due to treatment-related toxicity. Although toxicity rates decreased over time, five patients had treatment-limiting grade 3 or 4 toxicities after 60 months on therapy. 32 patients are still enrolled on the study.
INTERPRETATION: Pegylated interferon alfa-2a can induce durable haematological and molecular responses in patients with essential thrombocythaemia and polycythaemia vera. This drug alone and in combination with other drugs could be explored further in clinical trials. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28291640      PMCID: PMC5421384          DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30030-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Haematol        ISSN: 2352-3026            Impact factor:   18.959


Introduction

The two classical BCR-ABL–negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera are clonal hematopoietic neoplasms characterized by an overproduction of mature blood elements, tendencies toward thrombosis and hemorrhage, extramedullary hematopoiesis (mild splenomegaly), and transformation to myelofibrosis (MF)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1-3]. The therapeutic approach primarily focuses on controlling blood counts and reducing the risk of thrombosis. For patients judged to be at high-risk of thrombosis, cytoreductive therapy is instituted (typically hydroxyurea). As an alternative to hydroxyurea, recombinant interferon-alpha is frequently suggested given its biologic, anti-proliferative, immunomodulating, and anti-clonal effects in these patients. However, its widespread use has been limited by high rates of discontinuation due to side effects [4-9]. Pegylated forms of interferon have a better pharmacologic profile than short-acting interferons, resulting in a more convenient less-frequent schedule of injections, less immunogenicity and possibly less toxicity [10]. In particular, several clinical studies of pegylated interferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFN-α-2a), including our own [11,12], have reported promising results in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera. PEG-IFN-α-2a induced complete hematologic response (CHR) in a great majority of patients and complete molecular remission (CMR) in a fraction of patients, with lower toxicity rates than expected. However, all studies had a relatively short follow-up and the durability of responses and long-term safety have not been reported. Herein, we present long-term efficacy and safety data from a prospective phase 2 study of PEG-IFN-α-2a in 83 patients with advanced essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera after a median follow-up of 7 years, nearly twice as long as in previously reported studies.

Methods

Patient Selection

This is an ad hoc analysis of data from a prospective, open-label, single-center, phase 2 trial of PEG-IFN-α-2a in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera.[11,12]. Patients older than 18 years with either newly diagnosed or previously treated essential thrombocythemia or polycythemia vera according to the 2005 Polycythemia Vera Study Group criteria were eligble to enroll. Additional inclusion criteria included Eastern Cooperative Group Oncology status ≤ 2; adequate liver (total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dl) and renal function (serum creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dl); and normal cardiac function. Patients must have been off chemotherapy for at least one week prior to enrollment, but could be receiving hydroxyurea or anagrelide for up to 1 month after study entry. A washout period of one month was required for patients treated with continuous or chronic high doses of steroid. Exclusion criteria included pregnant or lactating women; history of another malignancy unless disease free for > 3 years); ischemic retinopathy; severe cardiac disease; history of medically significant psychiatric disease if not controlled, especially endogenous depression; a seizure disorder requiring anticonvulsant therapy; known infection with hepatitis B or C or HIV or other active systemic infection; renal disease requiring hemodialysis; or known autoimmune disease (except rheumatoid arthritis). All patients provided written informed consent. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study Procedures

PEG-IFN-α-2a was administered subcutaneously once weekly. The initial starting dose was 450 μg/week but was decreased in a stepwise manner due to toxicity to a final starting dose of 90 mcg/week: 3 patients were started at a dose of 450 μg/week, 3 at 360 μg/week, 19 at 270 μg/week, 26 at 180 μg/week, and 32 at 90 μg/week. Treatment was continued as long as the patients derived clinical benefit. During the study, the dose was modified based on toxicity or lack of efficacy. Any grade 3 or 4 event required therapy interruption. If the event resolved to grade 0 or 1 therapy could be resumed at a lower dose level. Persistent (≥ 2 weeks) significant grade 2 adverse events required dose reductions or discontinuation. Criteria for discontinuation included clearly documented disease progression (increasing transfusion requirement, splenomegaly, platelet or white blood cell counts, frequency of phlebotomy, or thromboembolic events) or no response within 6 months from the start of therapy despite dose escalation. The study is ongoing but not enrolling new patients.

Outcomes

The primary endpoint was hematologic response rate, as defined by European LeukemiaNet criteria [13]. Complete hematologic response (CHR) was defined as normalization of blood counts (essential thrombocythemia: platelets ≤ 440 x 109/L; PV: hemoglobin < 15.0 g/L without phlebotomy) with complete resolution of palpable splenomegaly/symptoms in the absence of a thrombotic event. A partial hematologic response (PR) required at least a 50% reduction in the platelet count for essential thrombocythemia or a 50% reduction in the rate of phlebotomies or 50% reduction in spleen size by palpation for polycythemia vera. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate the toxicities in these patients as well as the bone marrow morphologic and molecular disease characteristics before and during therapy. Physical exam and blood counts were assessed every 3 months. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy with quantitation of JAK2V617F and cytogenetics were performed at the start of therapy and every 3 to 6 months thereafter. [11,12] All patients who tested positive for the JAK2V617F mutation were evaluable for a MR if they had 2 or more adequate bone marrow samples while on therapy taken 3 months apart within the first year. Complete molecular remission (CMR; based solely on the assessment of a JAK2V617F allele burden) required undetectable JAK2V617F, while partial and minor molecular remissions (PMR, mMR) required reductions in baseline allele burden of >50% and 20–49%, respectively. All adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTAE v2.0).

Statistical Analysis

The analysis was based on an intention to treat population. A hematologic response rate of ≥ 35% was considered an indication of efficacy and justification for larger studies. An adverse event rate up to 20% was allowed. Only patients with a detectable JAK2V61F mutation at the start of therapy were evaluable for a molecular response. Responses and clinical data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test were used to define and compare the time to leukemia transformation from the date of diagnosis, with p-value < 0.05 as statistically significant. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare responses in different groups for categorical variable. The Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare continuous variables, as indicated. GraphPad Prism and SPSS v.23 were used for all analyses. This study is registered with http://clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00452023.

Role of the Funding Source

This research is supported in part by the MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA016672 from the National Cancer Institute. Hoffman-LaRoche provided PEG-IFN-α-2a for five years but had no role in designing the study, data collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, or writing the final report. The corresponding author had full access to all of the data and the final responsibility to submit for publication.

Results

Patient characteristics/current status

Forty-three patients with polycythemia vera and 40 with essential thrombocythemia were enrolled in a phase 2 trial of PEG-IFN-α-2a between May 31, 2005 and October 13, 2009, and 32 (39%) patients are still on study (polycythemia vera n=14, essential thrombocythemia n=18). Table 1 shows baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, which were evenly distributed between the polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia groups. The median follow-up time was 83 months (IQR, 69–94 months). Twenty-six (31%) patients were older than 60 years. Sixty-three percent of patients had received some form of therapy (in addition to aspirin) prior to enrollment, including standard IFN-α (n=14) and PEG-IFN-α-2a (n=1). Eleven essential thrombocythemia patients tested positive for CALR (n=8, 10%) and MPL (n=3, 3%), and 9 (11%) were triple negative.
Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the entire cohort.

CharacteristicPV (n=43)ET (n=40)total (n=83)p-value
Median age, (IQR)54 (44–63)52 (39–62)53.4 (43–62)p = 0.41

Males, n (%)17 (40)12 (30)29 (35)p = 0.49
Females, n (%)26 (60)28 (70)54 (65)p = 0.49
High risk disease, n (%)14(33)16(40)30 (36)p < 0.0001
Time from diagnosis to study entry, months (IQR)50 (13–89)37 (14–115)42 (14–98)p = 0.67

History of major thrombosis, n (%)2 (4.6)2 (5)4 (5)p = 1.00

No. JAK2 V617F-positive patients (%)41 (95%)19 (48%)60 (72)*p < 0.0001

JAK2 V617F allele burden, median (IQR)65 (34–78)23 (12–45)46 (23–76)*p < 0.0001

Abnormal karyotype, n (%)2 (5)4 (10)6 (7)p = 0.42

Median white blood cell count, 109/L (IQR)11.2 (8–16)7.2 (6–9)9 (6–13)p < 0.0001

Median hemoglobin, g/dL (IQR)14.2 (13–15)13.1 (12–14)13.8 (12–15)p = 0.06

Median platelet count, 109/L (IQR)496 (338–786)752 (473–1020)592 (389–938)p < 0.0025

Significant splenomegaly, n (% of known)7/42 (16)0/39 (0)7/81 (8.6)NA

Median spleen size BCM in cm (IQR)11 (4–14)NA11 (4–14)NA

Disease-related symptoms, n (%)19 (44)24 (60)43 (52)p = 0.19

Phlebotomy, n (%)32 (74%)NA32NA

High risk disease = patients ≥ 60 or previous thrombosis;

Significant splenomegaly defined as a palpable spleen > 5 cm below costal margin (BCM); NA = not applicable

Yearly discontinuation rates varied from 5% to 19% (Figure 1), with a median discontinuation rate of 5 patients/year (range, 3–16 patients/year). The median PEG-IFN-α-2a exposure time was 87 months (IQR, 17–85 months). The median follow-up after PEG-IFN-α-2a discontinuation for patients with available follow-up information (n=44) was 31 months (IQR, 18–65), and 12 patients were followed for more than 60 months after discontinuation.
Figure 1

Yearly discontinuation rates and reasons for treatment discontinuation. MF/AML= transformation to myelofibrosis/acute leukemia; Resp. = response, NR = no response; others [see explanation in the main text]

Hematologic response

All 83 patients were evaluable for a hematologic response, and the overall response rate was 80% (n=66) (Table 2), as previously reported[12]. The median duration of HR was 66 months (IQR, 35–83), and 26 (39%) were in HR at the time of last follow-up (all but 1 was a CHR). Neither achievement of a HR nor time to response was associated with age, gender, baseline clinical characteristics, splenomegaly, molecular status or JAK2V617F allele burden (Appendix p.1).
Table 2

Summary of clinical efficacy in all enrolled patients

CharacteristicsTotal, N= 83PV, N= 43ET, N= 40P-value
Median total follow-up time, months (IQR)82.5 (69–94)83 (65–92)83 (74–95)0.43

Median treatment duration, months (IQR)68.8 (15–85)59 (12–91)76 (25–83)0.49

INITIAL RESPONSE

Hematologic Resp. (HR), n, (%)Overall HR66 (80)34 (79)32 (80)1.00

CHR62 (75)33 (77)29 (73)0.35
PHR4 (5)3 (7)1 (3)0.61

Median HR duration, months (IQR)Overall65.7 (35–83)65 (43–87)58 (36–84)0.38

CHR67 (36–86)65 (33–82)58 (33–83)0.21
PHR30 (6–52)35 (2–58)25NA

Median time to response, months (IQR)4 (1.3–7.3)1.7 (1–4.7)4.8 (2.1–12.5)0.11

Molecular Resp. (MR), n (%)Overall MR35/55 (63)22 (63)13 (37)0.40

CMR10 (18)7 (20)3 (9)0.71
PMR20 (36)14 (40)6 (17)0.48
mMR5 (9)1 (3)4 (11)0.06

Median MR duration, months (IQR)Total53.4 (24–70)58 (38–77)57 (14–60)0.12

CMR69 (54–77)70 (59–77)54 (11–76)0.13
PMR49 (24–65)50 (22–68)47 (32–60)0.67
mMR18 (4–46.4)17.718 (6–51)NA

Median time to MR, months (range)24 (12–35)24 (12–30)23 (12–42)0.99

RESPONSE AT LAST FOLLOW-UP

Hematologic response, n (%)Overall HR26/66 (39)13/3413/32

HR type, n (% of overall HR)CHR25 (96)12 (92)13 (100)

Molecular response, n (%)Overall MR25/35 (71)17 (68)8 (32)

MR subtype, n (% of overall MR)CMR9 (36)6 (35)3 (38)
PMR6 (24)5 (29)1 (13)

Comments: The response at last follow-up is reported as seen at the time of last follow-up regardless of initial response.

Overall, 40 patients lost their response. Nineteen after dose reductions or drug holds due to intolerance or toxicity; one when he developed concurrent diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; and 20 due to progressive disease, despite being treated with the highest tolerable dose of PEG-IFN-α-2a. The median response duration among patients who lost their response was 46 months (IQR, 17–68). Among patients who were treated for at least 46 months, the median dose of PEG-IFN-α-2a was similar regardless of whether or not they lost their response (135 mcg/week vs 90 mcg/week, respectively, p=0.44). Remarkably, 7 patients (28%, 4 essential thrombocythemia, 3 polycythemia vera) have sustained their HR after discontinuation of PEG-IFN-α-2a (median time on therapy, 77 months [IWR, 56–98 months]; median response duration off study, 6 months [IQR, 4–34 months]).

Molecular response

Of the 63 (76%) JAK2V617F-positive patients, 55 (87%) were evaluable for a molecular response (MR). Eight patients who discontinued therapy in the first year and did not have 2 or more representative samples were not evaluable for a MR. The JAK2V617F allele burden was reduced in 63% (n=35) of these patients (Table 2), and 10 of them had a CMR as their best response (Appendix p.1). Among all JAK2-positive patients, the median JAK2V617F allele burden was 43% at baseline and 12% at the time of best response (Figure 2A). Among those with CMR, the JAK2V617F allele burden decreased by 35% and remained at that level (Appendix p.2). Patients with PMR or mMR had maximum reductions in allele burden of 23% and 16%, which were not sustained. This reduction was statistically significant only among polycythemia vera patients (P<0.001) and those with a CMR (P<0.001), as previously reported [12] (Figure 2B).
Figure 2

Molecular responses over time stratified by A) response type and B) diagnosis.

Molecular responses were achieved gradually over time, with a median time to response of 24 months, which did not differ by depth of response. Age was the only variable that significantly differed between patients with (median, 45 years) and without (median, 59 years) a MR (Appendix p.3). The response duration was longest among patients with a CMR (Table 2). Twenty-five patients have maintained at least a mMR, whereas 9 patients (6 polycythemia vera, 3 essential thrombocythemia) have lost their response completely. Four patients lost their response after the drug was withheld (median time from discontinuation to relapse 2 years. The other 5 lost their response while on therapy. Only one patient who achieved a CMR has relapsed after being off therapy for 16 months (CMR duration, 66 months). Among the 20 patients who achieved a PMR, 5 have sustained their best PMR, 7 are now in mMR, and 8 lost their response. Three of 5 patients have sustained their mMR. Ninety-four percent (n=33) of molecular responders also achieved a HR. However, a direct correlation between MR and HR was not observed in all cases, confirming the suggestion that HR is not a useful objective response measure in essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera.[14,15] For example, some patients who did not achieve a MR achieved a HR (n=11) and vice versa (2 patients with mMR never achieved a HR (Appendix p.3).

Disease–associated clinical complications

Over the course of the study, there were 8 major vascular thromboembolic (VTE) events, 3 of which were provoked by heart catheterization, elective chest surgery and angiogram. The incidence rate of major unprovoked VTE in enrolled patients during the entire study follow-up was 1.22 per 100 person-years. All 3 provoked VTEs occurred very shortly after starting therapy (median 2 months), and only 1 of these patients had achieved a HR. The other two patients continued therapy after the VTE, and one is still receiving treatment after more than 96 months without experiencing another VTE. Five patients (3 of whom were in CHR) experienced unprovoked VTEs (i.e., there was no discernable cause) after a median time on therapy of 38 months (range, 14–60 months) (Appendix p.3). Two of them were younger than 60 with no history of thrombosis. In addition, 1 patient had a serious unprovoked cerebrovascular hemorrhage while in CHR after 3 years on therapy.

Control of disease progression

Seven (8%) patients had disease progression while on therapy: six had progression to MF and one transformed to AML (Appendix p.4). All seven patients were women (4 essential thrombocythemia/3 polycythemia vera) and the median time to transformation was 40 months (IQR, 18–61 mo). Two of the polycythemia vera patients had splenomegaly and 3 patients had platelet counts > 1000 x 109/L (2 essential thrombocythemia, 1 polycythemia vera) at the start of therapy. All transformations were documented with repeated bone marrow biopsies and met the IWG-MRT diagnostic criteria for post-essential thrombocythemia or post-polycythemia myelofibrosis or had bone marrow blasts > 20% (for acute myeloid leukemia).[16] The cumulative incidence of MF progression among all enrolled patients at 5 years was 11%. However, given the small number of patients with progression to MF this number may not accurately reflect the true cumulative incidence. Cytogenetic analysis of BM biopsies at the time of progression showed no clonal evolution. Sequencing of a 48-gene panel in samples from 6 of 7 patients at baseline and time of transformation showed that two of these patients had acquired a mutation (1 DNMT3A, 1 ASXL1) at the time of transformation. The rate of transformation to MF/AML did not differ when compared with a cohort of age- and gender-matched historical patients not treated with PEG-IFN-α-2a (Figure 3). In addition, we observed no significant differences in disease duration, prior therapies, and cytogenetic/molecular features between patients with or without transformation. Five patients had been in HR at the last assessment before transformation (approximately 6 months earlier); one patient who transformed to AML (patient 7, Appendix) had been off therapy for 6 months prior to transformation for an unrelated reason (knee surgery). One patient was diagnosed with CML after transformation to MF. This patient had tested negative for the BCR-ABL transcript at least 3 times before and during the study. The BCR-ABL transcript was only detected after the patient had discontinued therapy due to progression to MF (biopsy confirmed).
Figure 3

Cumulative probability of transformation to MF/AML (age, gender matched historical control)

Safety and Tolerability

The distribution of hematologic and non-hematologic adverse events (AE) is outlined in Table 5. Among all patients, fatigue (75%), muscle pain (52%), nausea/vomiting and diarrhea (44%), and depression (32%) were the most common AEs. Severe hematologic AEs (Grade 3/4 or recurrent events despite dose reductions) occurred in 89% (n=22/25) of patients with polycythemia vera and 83% (n=20/24) of those with essential thrombocythemia. The AE rate decreased with time on therapy, yet did not completely disappear (Figure 4). New G3/4 toxicities unrelated to dose occurred ≥24 months from start of therapy in 10–17% of patients annually. The most common late AEs were fatigue (prevalent in all years), anemia and neutropenia (highest in the 3rd & 6th year), and depression (highest in 4th–6th year). Three patients with essential thrombocythemia experienced 4 episodes of G4 neutropenia, 3 of which occurred on a dose < 90 mcg/week.
Figure 4

Correlation of toxicities with time and dose.

Four patients (3 essential thrombocythemia, 1 polycythemia vera) developed autoimmune toxicities after a median time on therapy of 47.5 months (range, 26 – 78 months). All cases were biopsy proven and included hepatitis, central nervous system vasculitis, lupus nephritis and other presentations (Sjogren syndrome, dermatitis and vasculitis). Screening for auto-antibodies was only performed in patients with a clinical presentation suspicious for autoimmune disease (e.g., significant musculoskeletal or skin symptoms or any other atypical presentation). Thyroid function tests were done for all patients. None of the patients had a history of autoimmune disease, which was an exclusion criterion. Autoimmune thyroiditis, the most frequently reported autoimmune side effect of IFN-α [17], was observed in 15 patients (18%), but only 2 were severe (grade 3) enough to warrant treatment discontinuation. Overall, the dose had to be adjusted over the course of treatment, either for toxicity or lack of efficacy, in all but 2 patients. Eighteen patients (22%) discontinued therapy due to drug-related toxicities, G1–2 in 8 (10%) or G3–4 in 10 (12%) (Figure 1). Discontinuation rates were not correlated with PEG-IFN-α-2a dosage (Appendix p.5). The median time on therapy for these patients was 11 months (range, 2–60), although 4 patients requested discontinuation after < 6 months. Half of these patients had more than 1 type of toxicity, with the most common being neuropsychiatric (n=5 patients), gastrointestinal (n=4), and hematologic (n=3). An additional 12 patients had therapy held for >6 months due to toxicity, with a median time on hold of 29 months (range, 7–79). The most common toxicities leading to significant treatment interruptions were G3 neutropenia and multiple G2 toxicities, such as anemia, fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, diarrhea, neuropathy, and depression. Ten of 12 patients were rechallenged at a lower dose of PEG-IFN-a-2a, but because of persistent and recurrent toxicities (mostly G3 hematologic) they remained off therapy. The other two are being treated with a very low dose (45 mcg every 4–6 weeks), despite similar, though less severe, (only G1 non-hematologic) side effects (musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, rash), which they have deemed tolerable. Other reasons for discontinuation included motor vehicle accident (n=1); loss to follow-up (n=3); death (n=3); other malignancy (n=2); and financial (n=7). Three patients died while on study, but none were thought to be related to the study drug. One patient died of central pontine myelinolysis due to rapid correction of G3 hyponatremia, one due to complications from severe aortic stenosis and pulmonary hypertension, and one as a consequence of a motor vehicle accident.

Long-term responders

Thirty-two (38%; essential thrombocythemia 18, polycythemia vera 14) patients are still enrolled in the study (Appendix p.6), with 24 on active treatment. Nineteen are in HR. Eighteen of 24 (75%) patients are on a dose ≤ 90 mcg per week. Eight patients are having therapy held (7 essential thrombocythemia, 1 polycythemia vera) due to toxicity (n=5) or for financial reasons (n=3). Two patients have been holding the drug for 6 and 6.5 years. While on hold, 3 of 8 patients have lost their response (2 HR, 1 MR). Despite losing their responses, all 3 patients are symptom-free and prefer to stay on the study with active observation.

Discussion

Our long-term follow-up of a phase 2 study of PEG-IFN-α-2a in 83 patients with essential thrombocythemia or polycythemia vera shows that hematologic and molecular responses are durable in some patients and provides some important additional observations. First, patients may continue to derive a clinical benefit from PEG-IFN-α-2a (i.e., remain symptom free with no organomegaly or thrombotic event) even after losing their hematologic or molecular response. Second, only CMRs are durable, and in selected cases, can be sustained after discontinuation of therapy. Third, the clinical activity of PEG-IFN-α-2a is not correlated with the JAK2 mutation status. Fourth, toxicities unrelated to dosage may develop and can be treatment limiting in some patients, even after a long exposure to the drug. Lastly, disease-related vascular complications and/or progression to MF can still occur on therapy. Despite losing a HR, 13 patients continue to have significant clinical benefit and have elected to stay on study. We also found that neither molecular status nor achievement of a MR is a prerequisite for obtaining a HR or clinical benefit. For example, 11 (20%) JAK2-positive patients never achieved a MR, yet had HRs with a median duration of 35 months (range, 6–82). Similar findings have been reported by others[18,19]. In addition, 95% of JAK2-negative patients achieved a HR of similar duration to that of JAK2-positive patients, and half of them are still on study, suggesting that PEG-IFN-α-2a has similar clinical efficacy in JAK2-positive and -negative MPNs. Nine of ten patients who achieved a CMR had durable remissions (median, 69 months), while only 7 patients with a PMR or mMR maintained their best response. These findings are in contrast to those of Kiladjian et al. [20], showing no increase in JAK2 allele burden during follow-up (median follow-up, 31.4 months) regardless of depth of response. This difference may be explained in part by our longer follow-up, but it also reinforces the hypothesis that resistance may occur during the course of therapy through the acquisition of additional mutations (e.g., TET2, DNMT3a, ASXL1, IDH1, IDH2, EZH2, TP53) in clones that are not suppressed by PEG-IFN-α-2a [11,21,22]. Our finding that no clinical, demographic or treatment-related factors were associated with the achievement of a MR or its duration further strengthens this hypothesis. Additional molecular testing of patients treated for more than 24 months and after long-term follow-up is currently being performed in our patients to further investigate this question. Twenty eight percent (n=10) of patients with a MR achieved a CMR, similar to previously reported results [23], suggesting that PEG-IFN-α-2a may eradicate the JAK2 clone in selected cases, providing a “functional cure.” Moreover, 3 patients have maintained their CMR after discontinuation of therapy for 1.5, 4.5 and 6.5 years, similar to what has been reported by others [24,25]. However, studies have shown endogenous erythroid colony formation activity and/or the presence of the JAK2V617F allele at very low levels in more sensitive assays (level of detectability, 0.1%) [11,25,26] in patients who achieved a CMR with PEG-IFN-α. Therefore, we cannot assume the complete disappearance of the JAK2V617F clone in our patients. On the other hand, a very important clinical observation is that patients who achieved a CMR (our level of detectability) derived the longest clinical benefit. It remains to be determined whether deeper molecular responses really translate into better clinical outcome compared with patients that only maintain hematologic control. The fact that patients who achieved a CMR did not experience disease progression may support this hypothesis. Some reports have suggested that prolonged therapy with PEG-IFN-α could lead to a further reduction in JAK2V617F allele burden [20], a finding that was not confirmed in our study. In most of our patients, the JAK2V617F allele burden decreased within the first 24 months and subsequently increased over time; a continuous reduction was seen in only 3 patients (without a CMR) on long-term therapy. The long-term safety data from our study shows that the type and severity of late adverse events are similar to those observed earlier in the course of therapy; however, new late adverse events do occur even after 60 months on treatment, are often unrelated to dose or response status, and are therapy-limiting. The overall discontinuation rate due to toxicity was 22%, which is similar to that reported in other studies with shorter follow-up [20]. Unexpectedly, we found that 10% of patients in our study experienced thrombotic events on therapy, which is in contrast to previous reports showing low rates of thrombosis during treatment with PEG-IFN-α-2a [20]. One can only speculate as to why we have observed such a phenomenon. Similarly, treatment did not reduce the rate of transformation to MF/AML compared with our historical control cohort. Limitations of our study include its retrospective nature and the fact that only 44 of 83 patients were followed after discontinuation and some follow-ups were in the form of telephone conversations; therefore, rates of transformation to MF and thrombotic events may be underestimated. In addition, evaluation of bone marrow response was not a prespecified endpoint. However, changes in BM histology and response assessment with reticulin and trichrome staining are being evaluated as a separate study.[27] In addition, because the JAK2 testing was not performed with the most highly sensitive method, patients with CMR may have minimal residual disease that was not detected with our assay. Taken together, our finding suggest that PEG-IFN-a remains a viable treatment option, especially for younger patients who want to avoid prolonged cytotoxic therapy. Lower doses minimize side effects while retaining efficacy. Patients with a history of autoimmune diseases and those with mood disorders (e.g., depression or anxiety) should be monitored more closely for side effects. Future studies of PEG-IFN-α-2a or its combination with novel immunomodulatory drugs are needed to identify patients who would derive the most benefit. Furthermore, additional objective response criteria, such as objective measurement of spleen size and changes in bone marrow histology, and symptom/quality of life assessments before and after therapy should be used to better assess clinical benefit. While no formal consensus on the optimum dose or dosing schedule exists, from our experience and that of others[28,29], a starting dose of 45 mcg weekly is the optimal dosing strategy to limit AEs and maximize response. Whether novel forms of interferon [30] would be better tolerated, allowing patients to remain on therapy longer is of interest.
Table 3

Adverse events occurring in ≥ 10% of patients (related and unrelated)

SAFETYTYPEET, N (%)PV, N (%)GRADE 1–2 N (%)GRADE 3 N (%)GRADE 4 N (%)GRADE 5 N (%)
PATIENTS WITH AE, N (%)Any AE40 (100)43 (100)26 (33)53 (64)4 (5)3 (4)
Recurrent AE38 (95)36 (84)61 (84)13 (16)
AE SUBTYPES, N (%)Musculoskeletal36 (90)37 (86)67 (92)6 (8)
Neurological26 (65)27 (63)51 (96)2 (4)
Psychological17 (43)21 (49)34 (89)4 (11)
GIT (except for LFT abn)25 (63)20 (47)43 (80)11 (20)
Dermatologic10 (25)8 (19)16 (89)2 (11)
Infection/fever13 (33)13 (30)23 (88)3 (12)
Respiratory10 (25)13 (30)21 (91)2 (9)
Cardiovascular5 (13)8 (19)10 (77)3 (23)
Hypothyroidism10 (25)5 (12)13 (87)2 (13)
SELECTED ABNORMAL LABSLeukopenia/neutropenia17 (43)20 (47)16 (43)17 (46)4 (11)
Thrombocytopenia15 (35)3 (7) a17 (94)1 (6)
Anemia16 (40)20 (47)35 (97)1 (3)
LFT elevation17 (43)10 (23)22 (82)5 (18)
DEATHS ON STUDY*
Central pontine myelinolysis1 (33)
Chronic cardiac disease1 (33)
Motor vehicle accident1 (33)

None of the deaths were related to the study drug.

Table 4

Summary of long-term safety

Long-term safety3th year4th year5th year>6th year
New AE with RX> 24 mosTotal No of pts on RX60535041
All gradesPatients, n (%)10 (17)6 (11)5 (10)10 (24)
Events, n13141018
Grade 1 – 2Patients, n (%)6 (60)2 (33)4 (80)9 (90)
Events, n (%)9 (69)10 (71)9 (90)17 (94)
Grade 3Patients, n (%)4 (40)4 (67)1 (20)1 (10)
Events, n (%)4 (31)4 (29)1 (10)1 (6)
Grade 4Patients, n (%)1 (17)2 (40)1 (10)
Events, n (%)1 (7)2 (20)1 (6)
Deaths on StudyPatients, n (%)1 (6)

Grade 4 toxicities occurred only in patients with ET.

  30 in total

1.  Clonal analysis of erythroid progenitors suggests that pegylated interferon alpha-2a treatment targets JAK2V617F clones without affecting TET2 mutant cells.

Authors:  J-J Kiladjian; A Massé; B Cassinat; H Mokrani; I Teyssandier; J-P le Couédic; N Cambier; C Almire; E Pronier; N Casadevall; W Vainchenker; C Chomienne; F Delhommeau
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Pegylated interferon-alfa-2a induces complete hematologic and molecular responses with low toxicity in polycythemia vera.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Bruno Cassinat; Sylvie Chevret; Pascal Turlure; Nathalie Cambier; Murielle Roussel; Sylvia Bellucci; Bernard Grandchamp; Christine Chomienne; Pierre Fenaux
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Response criteria for essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera: result of a European LeukemiaNet consensus conference.

Authors:  Giovanni Barosi; Gunnar Birgegard; Guido Finazzi; Martin Griesshammer; Claire Harrison; Hans Carl Hasselbalch; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Eva Lengfelder; Mary Frances McMullin; Francesco Passamonti; John T Reilly; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Tiziano Barbui
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Vascular and neoplastic risk in a large cohort of patients with polycythemia vera.

Authors:  Roberto Marchioli; Guido Finazzi; Raffaele Landolfi; Jack Kutti; Heinz Gisslinger; Carlo Patrono; Raphael Marilus; Ana Villegas; Gianni Tognoni; Tiziano Barbui
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  High molecular response rate of polycythemia vera patients treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2a.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Bruno Cassinat; Pascal Turlure; Nathalie Cambier; Murielle Roussel; Sylvia Bellucci; Marie-Laurence Menot; Gerald Massonnet; Jean-Luc Dutel; Kamel Ghomari; Philippe Rousselot; Marie-Jose Grange; Yasmina Chait; William Vainchenker; Nathalie Parquet; Lina Abdelkader-Aljassem; Jean-François Bernard; Jean-Didier Rain; Sylvie Chevret; Christine Chomienne; Pierre Fenaux
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Minimal residual disease and normalization of the bone marrow after long-term treatment with alpha-interferon2b in polycythemia vera. A report on molecular response patterns in seven patients in sustained complete hematological remission.

Authors:  Thomas Stauffer Larsen; Michael Boe Møller; Karin de Stricker; Peter Nørgaard; Jan Samuelsson; Claus Marcher; Morten T Andersen; Ole Weis Bjerrum; Hans Carl Hasselbalch
Journal:  Hematology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.269

7.  Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: a consensus statement from the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment.

Authors:  G Barosi; R A Mesa; J Thiele; F Cervantes; P J Campbell; S Verstovsek; B Dupriez; R L Levine; F Passamonti; J Gotlib; J T Reilly; A M Vannucchi; C A Hanson; L A Solberg; A Orazi; A Tefferi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Thyroid autoimmunity and hypothyroidism during long-term treatment with recombinant interferon-alpha.

Authors:  H Gisslinger; B Gilly; W Woloszczuk; W R Mayr; L Havelec; W Linkesch; M Weissel
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Pegylated interferon alfa-2a yields high rates of hematologic and molecular response in patients with advanced essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera.

Authors:  Alfonso Quintás-Cardama; Hagop Kantarjian; Taghi Manshouri; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Zeev Estrov; Sherry Pierce; Mary Ann Richie; Gautam Borthakur; Marina Konopleva; Jorge Cortes; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Essential thrombocythemia beyond the first decade: life expectancy, long-term complication rates, and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Alexandra P Wolanskyj; Susan M Schwager; Rebecca F McClure; Dirk R Larson; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.616

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Novel and combination therapies for polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: the dawn of a new era.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.929

Review 2.  The Rationale for Immunotherapy in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Lucia Masarova; Prithviraj Bose; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 3.  JAK2 (and other genes) be nimble with MPN diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.

Authors:  Michele Ciboddo; Ann Mullally
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 4.  JAK2 inhibitors for myeloproliferative neoplasms: what is next?

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  SOHO State-of-the-Art Update and Next Questions: MPN.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Jason Gotlib; Claire N Harrison; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2018-01

6.  Ruxolitinib and interferon-α2 combination therapy for patients with polycythemia vera or myelofibrosis: a phase II study.

Authors:  Anders Lindholm Sørensen; Stine Ulrik Mikkelsen; Trine Alma Knudsen; Mads Emil Bjørn; Christen Lykkegaard Andersen; Ole Weis Bjerrum; Nana Brochmann; Dustin Andersen Patel; Lise Mette Rahbek Gjerdrum; Daniel El Fassi; Torben A Kruse; Thomas Stauffer Larsen; Hans Torben Mourits-Andersen; Claus Henrik Nielsen; Christina Ellervik; Niels Pallisgaard; Mads Thomassen; Lasse Kjær; Vibe Skov; Hans Carl Hasselbalch
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 7.  What are the current treatment approaches for patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia?

Authors:  Alessandro M Vannucchi; Paola Guglielmelli
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

8.  C/EBPβ is a critical mediator of IFN-α-induced exhaustion of chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells.

Authors:  Asumi Yokota; Hideyo Hirai; Ryuichi Sato; Hiroko Adachi; Fumiko Sato; Yoshihiro Hayashi; Atsushi Sato; Naoka Kamio; Yasuo Miura; Masakazu Nakano; Daniel G Tenen; Shinya Kimura; Kei Tashiro; Taira Maekawa
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-02-12

9.  Clinical outcomes of interferon therapy for polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenjing Gu; Renchi Yang; Zhijian Xiao; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 10.  Refining the management of polycythemia vera.

Authors:  Ruben A Mesa
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2018-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.