Evan W Alley1, Juanita Lopez2, Armando Santoro3, Anne Morosky4, Sanatan Saraf4, Bilal Piperdi4, Emilie van Brummelen5. 1. Hematology and Oncology Division, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: evan.alley@uphs.upenn.edu. 2. Drug Development Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. 3. Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. 4. Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA. 5. Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a highly aggressive cancer with poor prognosis and few treatment options following progression on platinum-containing chemotherapy. We assessed the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (an anti-programmed cell death receptor 1 [PD-1] antibody) in advanced solid tumours expressing programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and report here on the interim analysis of the malignant pleural mesothelioma cohort. METHODS: Previously treated patients with PD-L1-positive malignant pleural mesothelioma were enrolled from 13 centres in six countries. Patients received pembrolizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) for up to 2 years or until confirmed progression or unacceptable toxicity. Key eligibility criteria included measurable disease, failure of standard therapy, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. PD-L1 positivity was defined as expression in 1% or more of tumour cells by immunohistochemistry. Response was assessed based on investigator review using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1). Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, analysed in the all-patients-as-treated population, and objective response, analysed for the full-analysis set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02054806, and is ongoing but not recruiting participants. FINDINGS: As of June 20, 2016, 25 patients received pembrolizumab. 16 (64%) patients reported a treatment-related adverse event; the most common adverse event were fatigue (six [24%]), nausea (six [24%]), and arthralgia (five [20%]). Five (20%) patients reported grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. Three (12%) patients required dose interruption because of immune-related adverse events: one (4%) of 25 each had grade 3 rhabdomyolysis and grade 2 hypothyroidism; grade 3 iridocyclitis, grade 1 erythema multiforme, and grade 3 erythema; and grade 2 infusion-related reaction. No treatment-related deaths or discontinuations occurred. Five (20%) patients had a partial response, for an objective response of 20% (95% CI 6·8-40·7), and 13 (52%) of 25 had stable disease. Responses were durable (median response duration 12·0 months [95% CI 3·7 to not reached]); two patients remained on treatment at data cutoff. INTERPRETATION: Pembrolizumab appears to be well tolerated and might confer anti-tumour activity in patients with PD-L1-positive malignant pleural mesothelioma. Response durability and efficacy in this patient population warrants further investigation. FUNDING: Merck.
BACKGROUND:Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a highly aggressive cancer with poor prognosis and few treatment options following progression on platinum-containing chemotherapy. We assessed the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (an anti-programmed cell death receptor 1 [PD-1] antibody) in advanced solid tumours expressing programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and report here on the interim analysis of the malignant pleural mesothelioma cohort. METHODS: Previously treated patients with PD-L1-positive malignant pleural mesothelioma were enrolled from 13 centres in six countries. Patients received pembrolizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) for up to 2 years or until confirmed progression or unacceptable toxicity. Key eligibility criteria included measurable disease, failure of standard therapy, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. PD-L1 positivity was defined as expression in 1% or more of tumour cells by immunohistochemistry. Response was assessed based on investigator review using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1). Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, analysed in the all-patients-as-treated population, and objective response, analysed for the full-analysis set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02054806, and is ongoing but not recruiting participants. FINDINGS: As of June 20, 2016, 25 patients received pembrolizumab. 16 (64%) patients reported a treatment-related adverse event; the most common adverse event were fatigue (six [24%]), nausea (six [24%]), and arthralgia (five [20%]). Five (20%) patients reported grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. Three (12%) patients required dose interruption because of immune-related adverse events: one (4%) of 25 each had grade 3 rhabdomyolysis and grade 2 hypothyroidism; grade 3 iridocyclitis, grade 1 erythema multiforme, and grade 3 erythema; and grade 2 infusion-related reaction. No treatment-related deaths or discontinuations occurred. Five (20%) patients had a partial response, for an objective response of 20% (95% CI 6·8-40·7), and 13 (52%) of 25 had stable disease. Responses were durable (median response duration 12·0 months [95% CI 3·7 to not reached]); two patients remained on treatment at data cutoff. INTERPRETATION:Pembrolizumab appears to be well tolerated and might confer anti-tumour activity in patients with PD-L1-positive malignant pleural mesothelioma. Response durability and efficacy in this patient population warrants further investigation. FUNDING: Merck.
Authors: Tatiana Cunha Pereira; Paulo Rodrigues-Santos; Jani Sofia Almeida; Fábio Rêgo Salgueiro; Ana Raquel Monteiro; Filipa Macedo; Rita Félix Soares; Isabel Domingues; Paula Jacinto; Gabriela Sousa Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Astero Klampatsa; Shaun M O'Brien; Jeffrey C Thompson; Abhishek S Rao; Jason E Stadanlick; Marina C Martinez; Maria Liousia; Edward Cantu; Keith Cengel; Edmund K Moon; Sunil Singhal; Evgeniy B Eruslanov; Steven M Albelda Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2019-07-13 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Raffit Hassan; Anish Thomas; John J Nemunaitis; Manish R Patel; Jaafar Bennouna; Franklin L Chen; Jean-Pierre Delord; Afshin Dowlati; Samith T Kochuparambil; Matthew H Taylor; John D Powderly; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Claire Verschraegen; Hans Juergen Grote; Anja von Heydebreck; Kevin Chin; James L Gulley Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Vanessa S Fear; Caitlin Tilsed; Jonathan Chee; Catherine A Forbes; Thomas Casey; Jessica N Solin; Sally M Lansley; William Joost Lesterhuis; Ian M Dick; Anna K Nowak; Bruce W Robinson; Richard A Lake; Scott A Fisher Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 8.110