Literature DB >> 28290704

Predicting Manual Therapy Treatment Success in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability: Improving Self-Reported Function.

Erik A Wikstrom1, Patrick O McKeon2.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Therapeutic modalities that stimulate sensory receptors around the foot-ankle complex improve chronic ankle instability (CAI)-associated impairments. However, not all patients have equal responses to these modalities. Identifying predictors of treatment success could improve clinician efficiency when treating patients with CAI.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a response analysis on existing data to identify predictors of improved self-reported function in patients with CAI.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
SETTING: Sports medicine research laboratories. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine patients with CAI, which was defined in accordance with the International Ankle Consortium recommendations. INTERVENTION(S): Participants were randomized into 3 treatment groups (plantar massage [PM], ankle-joint mobilization [AJM], or calf stretching [CS]) that received six 5-minute treatments over 2 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Treatment success, defined as a patient exceeding the minimally clinically important difference of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Sport (FAAM-S).
RESULTS: Patients with ≤5 recurrent sprains and ≤82.73% on the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure had a 98% probability of having a meaningful FAAM-S improvement after AJM. As well, ≥5 balance errors demonstrated 98% probability of meaningful FAAM-S improvements from AJM. Patients <22 years old and with ≤9.9 cm of dorsiflexion had a 99% probability of a meaningful FAAM-S improvement after PM. Also, those who made ≥2 single-limb-stance errors had a 98% probability of a meaningful FAAM-S improvement from PM. Patients with ≤53.1% on the FAAM-S had an 83% probability of a meaningful FAAM-S improvement after CS.
CONCLUSIONS: Each sensory-targeted ankle-rehabilitation strategy resulted in a unique combination of predictors of success for patients with CAI. Specific indicators of success with AJM were deficits in self-reported function, single-limb balance, and <5 previous sprains. Age, weight-bearing-dorsiflexion restrictions, and single-limb balance deficits identified patients with CAI who will respond well to PM. Assessing self-reported sport-related function can identify CAI patients who will respond positively to CS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical prediction rules; joint mobilization; massage; stretching

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28290704      PMCID: PMC5402530          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.2.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  25 in total

1.  Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion.

Authors:  Kim L Bennell; Richard C Talbot; Henry Wajswelner; Wassana Techovanich; David H Kelly; Andrew J Hall
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  1998

2.  Ankle injuries in basketball: injury rate and risk factors.

Authors:  G D McKay; P A Goldie; W R Payne; B W Oakes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).

Authors:  Robroy L Martin; James J Irrgang; Ray G Burdett; Stephen F Conti; Jessie M Van Swearingen
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 4.  Characteristics of people with recurrent ankle sprains: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claire E Hiller; Elizabeth J Nightingale; Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Garrett F Coughlan; Brian Caulfield; Eamonn Delahunt
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Effects of joint mobilization on chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David Cruz-Díaz; Rafael Lomas Vega; Maria Catalina Osuna-Pérez; Fidel Hita-Contreras; Antonio Martínez-Amat
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  Nonexercise regression models to estimate peak oxygen consumption.

Authors:  D P Heil; P S Freedson; L E Ahlquist; J Price; J M Rippe
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium.

Authors:  Phillip A Gribble; Eamonn Delahunt; Chris Bleakley; Brian Caulfield; Carrie L Docherty; François Fourchet; Daniel Fong; Jay Hertel; Claire Hiller; Thomas W Kaminski; Patrick O McKeon; Kathryn M Refshauge; Philip van der Wees; Bill Vicenzino; Erik A Wikstrom
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Effect of coordination training with and without stochastic resonance stimulation on dynamic postural stability of subjects with functional ankle instability and subjects with stable ankles.

Authors:  Scott E Ross; Kevin M Guskiewicz
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.638

9.  Arthroscopic findings in patients with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Beat Hintermann; Andreas Boss; Dirk Schäfer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 10.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Megan N Houston; Johanna M Hoch; Matthew C Hoch
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  2 in total

1.  A 4-Week Multimodal Intervention for Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: Examination of Disease-Oriented and Patient-Oriented Outcomes.

Authors:  Cameron J Powden; Johanna M Hoch; Beth E Jamali; Matthew C Hoch
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Predicting the success of multimodal rehabilitation in chronic ankle instability based on patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Ran Zhang; Qiushi Qi; Weiqun Song; Yaping Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.562

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.