Literature DB >> 28290094

Evaluating the Calling Performance of a Rare Disease NGS Panel for Single Nucleotide and Copy Number Variants.

P Cacheiro1,2, A Ordóñez-Ugalde1, B Quintáns1,2, S Piñeiro-Hermida1, J Amigo2,3, M García-Murias1,2, S I Pascual-Pascual4, F Grandas5, J Arpa6, A Carracedo2,3, M J Sobrido7,8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Variant detection protocols for clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) need application-specific optimization. Our aim was to analyze the performance of single nucleotide variant (SNV) and copy number (CNV) detection programs on an NGS panel for a rare disease.
METHODS: Thirty genes were sequenced in 83 patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia. The variant calls obtained with LifeScope, GATK UnifiedGenotyper and GATK HaplotypeCaller were compared with Sanger sequencing. The calling efficiency was evaluated for 187 (56 unique) SNVs and indels. Five multiexon deletions detected by multiple ligation probe assay were assessed from the NGS panel data with ExomeDepth, panelcn.MOPS and CNVPanelizer software.
RESULTS: There were 48/51 (94%) SNVs and 1/5 (20%) indels consistently detected by all the calling algorithms. Two SNVs were not detected by any of the callers because of a rare reference allele, and one SNV in a low coverage region was only detected by two algorithms. Regarding CNVs, ExomeDepth detected 5/5 multi-exon deletions, panelcn.MOPs 4/5 and only 3/5 deletions were accurately detected by CNVPanelizer.
CONCLUSIONS: The calling efficiency of NGS algorithms for SNVs is influenced by variant type and coverage. NGS protocols need to account for the presence of rare variants in the reference sequence as well as for ambiguities in indel calling. CNV detection algorithms can be used to identify large deletions from NGS panel data for diagnostic applications; however, sensitivity depends on coverage, selection of the reference set and deletion size. We recommend the incorporation of several variant callers in the NGS pipeline to maximize variant detection efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28290094     DOI: 10.1007/s40291-017-0268-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1177-1062            Impact factor:   4.074


  44 in total

1.  Gene inactivation and its implications for annotation in the era of personal genomics.

Authors:  Suganthi Balasubramanian; Lukas Habegger; Adam Frankish; Daniel G MacArthur; Rachel Harte; Chris Tyler-Smith; Jennifer Harrow; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Detection of clinically relevant copy number variants with whole-exome sequencing.

Authors:  Joep de Ligt; Philip M Boone; Rolph Pfundt; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Todd Richmond; Joel Geoghegan; Kathleen O'Moore; Nicole de Leeuw; Christine Shaw; Han G Brunner; James R Lupski; Joris A Veltman; Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 3.  Exome sequence read depth methods for identifying copy number changes.

Authors:  Latha Kadalayil; Sajjad Rafiq; Matthew J J Rose-Zerilli; Reuben J Pengelly; Helen Parker; David Oscier; Jonathan C Strefford; William J Tapper; Jane Gibson; Sarah Ennis; Andrew Collins
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  UpSet: Visualization of Intersecting Sets.

Authors:  Alexander Lex; Nils Gehlenborg; Hendrik Strobelt; Romain Vuillemot; Hanspeter Pfister
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.579

5.  Characterization and identification of hidden rare variants in the human genome.

Authors:  Alberto Magi; Romina D'Aurizio; Flavia Palombo; Ingrid Cifola; Lorenzo Tattini; Roberto Semeraro; Tommaso Pippucci; Betti Giusti; Giovanni Romeo; Rosanna Abbate; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  VariantMetaCaller: automated fusion of variant calling pipelines for quantitative, precision-based filtering.

Authors:  András Gézsi; Bence Bolgár; Péter Marx; Peter Sarkozy; Csaba Szalai; Péter Antal
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Comparison of insertion/deletion calling algorithms on human next-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Dalia H Ghoneim; Jason R Myers; Emily Tuttle; Alex R Paciorkowski
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Reducing INDEL calling errors in whole genome and exome sequencing data.

Authors:  Han Fang; Yiyang Wu; Giuseppe Narzisi; Jason A O'Rawe; Laura T Jimenez Barrón; Julie Rosenbaum; Michael Ronemus; Ivan Iossifov; Michael C Schatz; Gholson J Lyon
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 11.117

9.  A global reference for human genetic variation.

Authors:  Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Richard M Durbin; Erik P Garrison; Hyun Min Kang; Jan O Korbel; Jonathan L Marchini; Shane McCarthy; Gil A McVean; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Bioinformatic Challenges in Clinical Diagnostic Application of Targeted Next Generation Sequencing: Experience from Pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Joakim Crona; Viktor Ljungström; Staffan Welin; Martin K Walz; Per Hellman; Peyman Björklund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Rapid Identification of Pathogenic Variants in Two Cases of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease by Gene-Panel Sequencing.

Authors:  Chi-Chun Ho; Shuk-Mui Tai; Edmond Chi-Nam Lee; Timothy Shin-Heng Mak; Timothy Kam-Tim Liu; Victor Wai-Lun Tang; Wing-Tat Poon
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Performance of In Silico Prediction Tools for the Detection of Germline Copy Number Variations in Cancer Predisposition Genes in 4208 Female Index Patients with Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Louisa Lepkes; Mohamad Kayali; Britta Blümcke; Jonas Weber; Malwina Suszynska; Sandra Schmidt; Julika Borde; Katarzyna Klonowska; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Jan Hauke; Piotr Kozlowski; Rita K Schmutzler; Eric Hahnen; Corinna Ernst
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  Genetic-molecular characterization in the diagnosis of primary immunodeficiencies.

Authors:  Gesmar Rodrigues Silva Segundo
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.990

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.