Literature DB >> 28289930

The importance of microvessel density in predicting cancer progression in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Aditi Arora1, Ankur Bansal2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of microvessel density (MVD) in predicting lymph node (LN) metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 266 patients with PSCC were analyzed. Parameters examined were tumor stage, grade, nodal status, intratumoral and peritumoral MVD. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate association between different histopathological variables and MVD. ROC was plotted to derive a prediction model using appropriate cutoff values of the parameters predicting cancer progression.
RESULTS: 77 patients were found to have histologically proven metastatic LN. MVD did not correlate significantly with T stage and grade of tumor. The intratumoral and peritumoral MVD of patients with metastatic LN was significantly higher than patients with negative LN (58.92 vs. 49.89 and 65.57 vs. 53.72, respectively; P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis also revealed that MVD (intratumoral and peritumoral) was independent predictor for LN metastasis. From ROC curve, at the cutoff value of 54, intratumoral MVD predicted LN metastasis with sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 87%. Similarly, at cutoff value of 61, peritumoral MVD predicted LN metastasis with sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 89%. The 5-year survival was 79 and 77% for those with low intratumoral and peritumoral MVD, respectively, as compared to 41 and 39% for those with high intratumoral and peritumoral MVD, respectively (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Higher intratumoral and peritumoral MVD predicts cancer progression in patients with PSCC. Patients with an intratumoral MVD of 54 and peritumoral MVD of 61 have lymph node metastasis with a high sensitivity and specificity. The overall 5-year survival of patients is poor in high intratumoral or peritumoral MVD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grading; Lymph node; Microvessel density; Penile; Squamous cell carcinoma; Staging

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28289930     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1565-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  24 in total

Review 1.  Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 2: the role and technique of lymph node dissection.

Authors:  S Horenblas
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update.

Authors:  Oliver W Hakenberg; Eva M Compérat; Suks Minhas; Andrea Necchi; Chris Protzel; Nick Watkin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Quantitation of microvessel density in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck by computer-aided image analysis.

Authors:  Boban M Erovic; Csilla Neuchrist; Uwe Berger; Karem El-Rabadi; Martin Burian
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors and natural history in monocentric study with a conservative policy.

Authors:  J C Soria; K Fizazi; D Piron; A Kramar; A Gerbaulet; C Haie-Meder; J L Perrin; B Court; P Wibault; C Théodore
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Tumor angiogenesis and prognosis in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  U K Zätterström; E Brun; R Willén; E Kjellén; J Wennerberg
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 6.  Penile carcinoma: a challenge for the developing world.

Authors:  Sanjeev Misra; Arun Chaturvedi; Naresh C Misra
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Clinical significance of tumor angiogenesis in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  O Nativ; E Sabo; A Reiss; M Wald; S Madjar; B Moskovitz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Treatment of carcinoma of the penis: the case for primary lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  W S McDougal; F K Kirchner; R H Edwards; L T Killion
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Relationship among cystectomy, microvessel density and prognosis in stage T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  C P Dinney; R C Babkowski; M Antelo; P Perrotte; M Liebert; H Z Zhang; J Palmer; R W Veltri; R L Katz; H B Grossman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Antonio Galfano; Vincenzo De Marco; Walter Artibani; Vincenzo Ficarra
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2007-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.