| Literature DB >> 28289404 |
Julio Bohórquez1, Terry J McGenity2, Sokratis Papaspyrou3, Emilio García-Robledo4, Alfonso Corzo5, Graham J C Underwood2.
Abstract
Intertidal areas support extensive diatom-rich biofilms. Such microphytobenthic (MPB) diatoms exude large quantities of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) comprising polysaccharides, glycoproteins and other biopolymers, which represent a substantial carbon pool. However, degradation rates of different EPS components, and how they shape heterotrophic communities in sediments, are not well understood. An aerobic mudflat-sediment slurry experiment was performed in the dark with two different EPS carbon sources from a diatom-dominated biofilm: colloidal EPS (cEPS) and the more complex hot-bicarbonate-extracted EPS. Degradation rate constants determined over 9 days for three sediment fractions [dissolved organic carbon (DOC), total carbohydrates (TCHO), and (cEPS)] were generally higher in the colloidal-EPS slurries (0.105-0.123 d-1) compared with the hot-bicarbonate-extracted-EPS slurries (0.060-0.096 d-1). Addition of hot-bicarbonate-EPS resulted in large increases in dissolved nitrogen and phosphorous by the end of the experiment, indicating that the more complex EPS is an important source of regenerated inorganic nutrients. Microbial biomass increased ~4-6-fold over 9 days, and pyrosequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA genes revealed that the addition of both types of EPS greatly altered the bacterial community composition (from 0 to 9 days) compared to a control with no added EPS. Bacteroidetes (especially Tenacibaculum) and Verrucomicrobia increased significantly in relative abundance in both the hot-bicarbonate-EPS and colloidal-EPS treatments. These differential effects of EPS fractions on carbon-loss rates, nutrient regeneration and microbial community assembly improve our understanding of coastal-sediment carbon cycling and demonstrate the importance of diverse microbiota in processing this abundant pool of organic carbon.Entities:
Keywords: EPS; G-model; degradation rate; intertidal sediment; microbial community; microphytobenthos; nutrient regeneration; pyrosequencing
Year: 2017 PMID: 28289404 PMCID: PMC5326797 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Concentrations of the three carbohydrate fractions measured: Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) (A), Total Carbohydrates (B) and colloidal EPS (C), in estuarine sediment slurries (200 mg from the top 2 mm, 80 mL artificial sea water (ASW) over 9 days) for the treatments +EPScoll, +EPSHB, NoAdd-EPS and the controls (no sediment added), NoSed+EPScoll and NoSed+EPSHB represented with dotted lines. Values are means (n = 3) ± standard error (SE), expressed as μmol C L−1 of slurry.
Comparison of degradation constant (.
| + | + | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) | 0.105a ± 0.01 | 1.19 ± 0.18 | 0.060b ± 0.005 | 0.84a ± 0.08 |
| Total Carbohydrates (TCHO) | 0.123a ± 0.02 | 0.81a, b ± 0.19 | 0.096a, b ± 0.02 | 0.68a ± 0.16 |
| Colloidal EPS (cEPS) | 0.121a ± 0.007 | 0.44b ± 0.03 | 0.062b ± 0.01 | 0.36b ± 0.07 |
The determination coefficients were significant for both the exponential and the lineal fitting (p < 0.05, n = 12). Differences in k or b were compared by ANCOVA between organic fractions (DOC, TCHO and cEPS) within the same treatment (+EPS.
Figure 2Concentrations of different inorganic nutrients measured: Nitrate, Nitrite and Ammonium expressed as Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen (DIN) (A), Phosphate (B), and Silicate (C) in estuarine sediment slurries (200 mg from the top 2 mm, 80 mL artificial sea water (ASW) over 9 days) for the treatments +EPScoll, +EPSHB, NoAdd-EPS and the controls (no sediment added), NoSed+EPScoll and NoSed+EPSHB represented with dotted lines. Values are means (n = 3) ± standard error (SE), expressed as μmol L−1 of slurry.
Figure 3DNA concentration (as a proxy for biomass) in estuarine sediment slurries for the treatments +EPS.
Figure 4Non-metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling ordination plot based on Bray Curtis similarity of relative abundance data of the bacterial community from the different treatments +EPS. Samples of +EPScoll treatment at day 0 are used as initial samples for the rest of treatments (stress: 0.02). Points represent centroids of replicate samples. Groups at 40 and 60% similarity are shown after applying a group average clustering. The vector overlay shows the environmental variables with correlation >0.5. Arrows indicate direction and relative magnitude of influence.
Figure 5Comparison of bacterial community profiles in +EPS and Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) defined at >95% similarity (B). Analysis was performed using STAMP (Parks and Beiko, 2010; Parks et al., 2014) with default parameters except that parameters for filtering out were: p > 0.05; difference between proportions <0.2 or difference between ratios <1.5. Data were sorted according to effect size. Note the differences in the scale of the x axes. The only phyla that were significantly enriched at day-9 in EPS treatment compared with the NoAdd-EPS control were the Bacteroidetes (~2-fold more abundant) and Verrucomicrobia (~5-fold more abundant; data not shown). The information to the right of the p-values is the identity of the OTU, whereby the phylum is indicated to the left of the comma (AP, Alphaprotebacteria; Bact, Bacteroidetes; Plan, Planctomycetes; Verr, Verrucomicrobia), and the lowest taxonomic level to which the OTU can be confidently assigned is indicated to the right of the comma. A total of 23 bacterial taxa was significantly enriched in +EPS treatment compared with NoAdd-EPS treatment but only the top 12 is shown.
Figure 6Comparison of bacterial community profiles in +EPS and Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) defined at >95% similarity (B). Analysis was performed using STAMP (Parks and Beiko, 2010; Parks et al., 2014) with default parameters except that parameters for filtering out were: p > 0.05; difference between proportions <0.2 or difference between ratios <1.5. Data were sorted according to effect size. Note the differences in the scale of the x axes. The only phyla that were significantly enriched at day-9 in EPSHB treatment compared with the NoAdd-EPS control were the Bacteroidetes (~2.5-fold more abundant) and Verrucomicrobia (~6-fold more abundant; data not shown). The information to the right of the p-values is the identity of the OTU, whereby the phylum is indicated to the left of the comma (AP, Alphaprotebacteria; Bact, Bacteroidetes; GP, Gammaproteobacteria; Verr, Verrucomicrobia), and the lowest taxonomic level to which the OTU can be confidently assigned is indicated to the right of the comma. A total of eight bacterial taxa were significantly enriched in +EPSHB treatment compared with NoAdd-EPS treatment.
Comparison of degradation rates for different carbon fractions from previous published studies.
| Goto et al., | 14C-labeled MPB community | ||||
| 14C-EDOC | 14C-EDOC | NP | |||
| 14C-EDTA-OC | 14C-EDTA-OC | NP | |||
| 14C-EPScoll | 14C-EPScoll | NP | |||
| Haynes et al., | CHOcoll | EPScoll (μg gluc. g−1 DW) | 233.8 | 0–2 d: −81 § | 4–10 d: +50 § |
| CHOHB (μg gluc. g−1 DW) | 336.5 | NP | |||
| EPScoll | EPScoll (μg gluc. g−1 DW) | 383.2 | 0–2 d: −140 § | 4–10 d: +224.8 § | |
| CHOHB (μg gluc. g−1 DW) | 482.7 | NP | |||
| Hofmann et al., | CHOcoll | EPScoll (μg gluc. mL−1 slurry) | 10.2 | 0–4 h: +15 ¤ | 4–24 h: −3.5 ¤ |
| EPScoll | EPScoll (μg gluc. mL−1 slurry) | 27.7 | 0–4 h: −81 ¤ | 4–24 h: +0.85 ¤ | |
| Bellinger et al., | None | Control treat | |||
| CHOHB (μg g−1 DW biofilm) | 1,625 | 4–12 h: +16.37 φ | |||
| 13C-enriched treat | |||||
| CHOHB (μg g−1 DW biofilm) | 1,300 | 4–12 h: +3.8 φ | 12–48 h: −3.9 φ | ||
| Oakes et al., | None | First order decay rate (2-G model) | |||
| Mannose (mmol C m−2) | 24.8 | ||||
| Fucose (mmol C m−2) | 49.2 | ||||
| Rhamnose (mmol C m−2) | 80 | ||||
| Galactose (mmol C m−2) | 105 | ||||
| Glucose (mmol C m−2) | 113 | ||||
| Xylose (mmol C m−2) | 34.2 | ||||
| McKew et al., | None | DOC (μg C g−1 DW) | 565 | Aer. 0–10 d: −44 † | Aer. 10–25 d: +6 † |
| Anaer. 0–10 d: −36 † | Anaer. 10–25 d: +7 † | ||||
| CHOHB (μg C g−1 DW) | 488 | Aer. 0–10 d: +12 † | Aer. 10–25 d: −8.8 † | ||
| Anaer. 0–10 d: −6 † | Anaer. 10–25 d: +1 † | ||||
| TCHO (μg C g−1 DW) | 2,894 | Aer. 0–10 d: −99 † | Aer. 10–25 d: +9.8 † | ||
| Anaer. 0–10 d: −100 † | Anaer. 0–10 d: +3.6 † | ||||
| Taylor et al., | 13C-labeled EPS | CHOcoll (ug gluc. g−1 WW) | 89.85 | 0–30 h: +0.07¤ | 30–72 h: −1.06 ¤ |
| EPScoll (ug gluc. g−1 WW) | 47.75 | 0–30 h: −0.7 ¤ | 30–72 h: −0.2 ¤ | ||
| DOC in CHOcoll (ug gluc. g−1 WW) | 402.23 | 0–72 h: −3.4 ¤ | |||
| DOC in EPScoll (ug gluc. g−1 WW) | 49.98 | 0–72 h: −0.5 ¤ | |||
| 12C-unlabeled EPS | CHOcoll (ug gluc. g−1 WW) | 92.75 | 0–30 h: +0.39 ¤ | 30–72 h: −1.2 ¤ | |
| EPScoll (ug gluc. g−1 WW) | 48.27 | 0–30 h: −1.03 ¤ | |||
| DOC in CHOcoll (ug gluc. g−1 WW) | 394.2 | 0–72 h: −2.9¤ | |||
| DOC in EPScoll (ug gluc. g−1 WW) | 41.22 | 0–72 h: −0.24 ¤ | |||
| Miyatake et al., | None | TCHO (μmol C g−1 DW) | 27.1 | NSC (27.04 μmol C g−1 DW; max. of 29.5 at 72 h) | |
| CHOcoll (μmol C g−1 DW) | 3.6 | 0–72 h: −0.04 (μmol C g−1 DW h−1; incr. of 1.9 at 120 h) | |||
| EDTA-CHO (μmol C g−1 DW) | 0.85 | NSC (0.99 μmol C g−1 DW; min. of 0.3 at 72 h) | |||
Rates were calculated using the data presented in the paper in the form of tables or graphs, when not provided by the authors. In the final column, showing the rates of degradation, sub-columns are used to indicate the rates with different treatments as indicated. In order to avoid confusion, rates are presented in the units given in the original publication. Symbols + and − preceding the degradation rates indicate accumulation or loss, respectively. Abbreviations and details of the microbial community involved in the degradation of the added carbon source are provided in the footnote.
Although starting concentrations were not provided, calculations for degradation rates were estimated using the percentage of added substrates mineralized.
In these experiments no additional organic carbon source was added; sediment DOC/EPS was labeled using NaH.
Details about the microbial community composition and EPS-induced changes are as follows:
Microbial community was not studied.
Increases in Bacteroidetes and Alphaproteobacteria, especially Acinetobacter (and in particular in the cEPS-enrichment).
Isolation of Variovorax sp. as the main EPS-degrader (Betaproteobacteria).
Gram-negative bacteria incorporated diatom-derived carbon faster than Gram-positive bacteria.
Aerobic slurries had a high relative abundance of Gammaproteobacteria and a big increase in Verrucomicrobia, while in the anaerobic slurries Deltaproteobacteria were dominant (especially Desulfobacteraceae and Desulfobulbaceae).
Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria increased in the slurry with added .
The bacterial community was dominated by Gammaproteobacteria (21%), and to a lesser extent by Bacteroidetes (8%) and Deltaproteobacteria (7%).
Abbreviations of DOM/EPS sources are: DOM, Dissolved Organic Matter; EPS, Extracellular Polymeric Substances; .