Literature DB >> 28289299

Disseminating Comparative Effectiveness Research Through Community-based Experiential Learning.

Richard A Hansen1, Margaret Williamson1, Lynn Stevenson1, Brandy R Davis1, R Lee Evans1.   

Abstract

Objectives. To launch and evaluate a comparative effectiveness research education and dissemination program as part of an introductory pharmacy practice experience (IPPE). Methods. First- through third-year PharmD students received training on comparative effectiveness research and disseminated printed educational materials to patients in the community who they were monitoring longitudinally (n=314). Students completed an assessment and initial visit documentation form at the first visit, and a follow-up assessment and documentation form at a subsequent visit. Results. Twenty-three diabetes patients, 29 acid-reflux patients, 30 osteoarthritis patients, and 50 hypertension patients received materials. Aside from the patient asking questions, which was the most common outcome (n=44), the program resulted in 38 additional actions, which included stopping, starting, or changing treatments or health behaviors, or having additional follow-up or diagnostic testing. Small but positive improvements in patient understanding, confidence, and self-efficacy were observed. Conclusions. Dissemination of comparative effectiveness research materials in an IPPE program demonstrated a positive trend in markers of informed decision-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparative effectiveness; informed decision-making; introductory pharmacy practice experience

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28289299      PMCID: PMC5339595          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe8119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  22 in total

1.  Health literacy: a policy challenge for advancing high-quality health care.

Authors:  Ruth M Parker; Scott C Ratzan; Nicole Lurie
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  The patient self-advocacy scale: measuring patient involvement in health care decision-making interactions.

Authors:  D E Brashers; S M Haas; J L Neidig
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  1999

3.  Training and career development for comparative effectiveness research workforce development: CTSA Consortium Strategic Goal Committee on comparative effectiveness research workgroup on workforce development.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Wishwa Kapoor; Mark Helfand; David O Meltzer; Mary Anne McDonald; Harry Selker
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.689

4.  Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics.

Authors:  C H Braddock; K A Edwards; N M Hasenberg; T L Laidley; W Levinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Use of a decision aid to improve treatment decisions in osteoporosis: the osteoporosis choice randomized trial.

Authors:  Victor M Montori; Nilay D Shah; Laurie J Pencille; Megan E Branda; Holly K Van Houten; Brian A Swiglo; Rebecca L Kesman; Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel; Thomas M Jaeger; Ruth E Johnson; Gregory A Bartel; L Joseph Melton; Robert A Wermers
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 6.  Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  N Freemantle; E L Harvey; F Wolf; J M Grimshaw; R Grilli; L A Bero
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

7.  Five reasons that many comparative effectiveness studies fail to change patient care and clinical practice.

Authors:  Justin W Timbie; D Steven Fox; Kristin Van Busum; Eric C Schneider
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy.

Authors:  Dean Schillinger; John Piette; Kevin Grumbach; Frances Wang; Clifford Wilson; Carolyn Daher; Krishelle Leong-Grotz; Cesar Castro; Andrew B Bindman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-13

9.  Providing written information for patients: psychological considerations.

Authors:  J Weinman
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  Translating comparative effectiveness of depression medications into practice by comparing the depression medication choice decision aid to usual care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Annie LeBlanc; Amy E Bodde; Megan E Branda; Kathleen J Yost; Jeph Herrin; Mark D Williams; Nilay D Shah; Holly Van Houten; Kari L Ruud; Laurie J Pencille; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.