Literature DB >> 28288792

Disparities in the management of ectopic pregnancy.

Jennifer Y Hsu1, Ling Chen1, Arielle R Gumer1, Ana I Tergas2, June Y Hou3, William M Burke3, Cande V Ananth4, Dawn L Hershman5, Jason D Wright6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ectopic pregnancy is common among young women. Treatment can consist of either surgery with salpingectomy or salpingostomy or medical management with methotrexate. In addition to acute complications, treatment of ectopic pregnancy can result in long-term sequelae that include decreased fertility. Little is known about the patterns of care and predictors of treatment in women with ectopic pregnancy. Similarly, data on outcomes for various treatments are limited.
OBJECTIVE: We examined the patterns of care and outcomes for women with ectopic pregnancy. Specifically, we examined predictors of medical (vs surgical) management of ectopic pregnancy and tubal conservation (salpingostomy vs salpingectomy) among women who underwent surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: The Perspective database was used to identify women with a diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy treated from 2006-2015. Perspective is an all-payer database that collects data on patients at hospitals from throughout the United States. Women were classified as having undergone medical treatment, if they received methotrexate, and surgical treatment, if treatment consisted of salpingostomy or salpingectomy. Multivariable models were developed to examine predictors of medical treatment and of tubal conserving salpingostomy among women who were treated surgically.
RESULTS: Among the 62,588 women, 49,090 women (78.4%) were treated surgically, and 13,498 women (21.6%) received methotrexate. Use of methotrexate increased from 14.5% in 2006 to 27.3% by 2015 (P<.001). Among women who underwent surgery, salpingostomy decreased over time from 13.0% in 2006 to 6.0% in 2015 (P<.001). Treatment in more recent years, at a teaching hospital and at higher volume centers, were associated with the increased use of methotrexate (P<.05 for all). In contrast, Medicaid recipients (adjusted risk ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.98) and uninsured women (adjusted risk ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.93) were less likely to receive methotrexate than commercially insured patients. Among those who underwent surgery, black (adjusted risk ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.85) and Hispanic (adjusted risk ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.96) patients were less likely to undergo tubal conserving surgery than white women and Medicaid recipients (adjusted risk ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.75); uninsured women (adjusted risk ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.66) less frequently underwent salpingostomy than commercially insured patients.
CONCLUSION: There is substantial variation in the management of ectopic pregnancy. There are significant race- and insurance-related disparities associated with treatment.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disparity; ectopic pregnancy; methotrexate; salpingectomy; salpingostomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28288792      PMCID: PMC5484775          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  24 in total

1.  Trends in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy in the United States.

Authors:  Karen W Hoover; Guoyu Tao; Charlotte K Kent
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Population-based study on the effect of socioeconomic factors and race on management and outcomes of 35,535 inpatient ectopic pregnancies.

Authors:  Jessica Papillon-Smith; Basel Imam; Valerie Patenaude; Haim Arie Abenhaim
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Trends in ectopic pregnancy mortality in the United States: 1980-2007.

Authors:  Andreea A Creanga; Carrie K Shapiro-Mendoza; Connie L Bish; Suzanne Zane; Cynthia J Berg; William M Callaghan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Fertility after tubal ectopic pregnancy: results of a population-based study.

Authors:  Marianne de Bennetot; Benoît Rabischong; Bruno Aublet-Cuvelier; Fabien Belard; Hervé Fernandez; Jean Bouyer; Michel Canis; Jean-Luc Pouly
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Cynthia M Farquhar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Aug 13-19       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparison of multidose and single-dose methotrexate protocols for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Gary H Lipscomb; Vanessa M Givens; Norman L Meyer; Derita Bran
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Treatment of ectopic pregnancies in 2014: new answers to some old questions.

Authors:  Perrine Capmas; Jean Bouyer; Hervé Fernandez
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Fertility after ectopic pregnancy: the DEMETER randomized trial.

Authors:  Hervé Fernandez; Perrine Capmas; Jean Philippe Lucot; Benoit Resch; Pierre Panel; Jean Bouyer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Ectopic pregnancy rates in the Medicaid population.

Authors:  Debra B Stulberg; Loretta R Cain; Irma Dahlquist; Diane S Lauderdale
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Nonsurgical management of ectopic pregnancy associated with severe hyperstimulation syndrome.

Authors:  H C Chotiner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  4 in total

1.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Predictive value of PAPP-A for ectopic pregnancy and analysis of related factors.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Zhang; Chunxia Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Placenta-specific drug delivery by trophoblast-targeted nanoparticles in mice.

Authors:  Baozhen Zhang; Lunbo Tan; Yan Yu; Baobei Wang; Zhilong Chen; Jinyu Han; Mengxia Li; Jie Chen; Tianxia Xiao; Balamurali K Ambati; Lintao Cai; Qing Yang; Nihar R Nayak; Jian Zhang; Xiujun Fan
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 11.556

4.  Predictors and clinical features of methotrexate (MTX) therapy for ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yu Zhang; Lu Gan; Xiao-Ying Liu; Shan-Ping Du
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.