| Literature DB >> 28288672 |
Harry Pickering1, Sarah E Burr2, Tamsyn Derrick3, Pateh Makalo2, Hassan Joof2, Richard D Hayward4, Martin J Holland3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) infection causes trachoma, the leading infectious cause of blindness. A Ct D/UW3 proteome microarray and sera from Gambian adults with trachomatous trichiasis (TT) or healthy matched controls previously identified several novel antigens, which suggested differential recognition in adults with TT.Entities:
Keywords: Antibodies; Chlamydia trachomatis; Microarray; Trachoma; Trachomatous scarring; Trachomatous trichiasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28288672 PMCID: PMC5347170 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2078-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Participant demographics from the study of TS and matched controls from The Gambia in 1995. Age (generalised linear model) and gender (Fisher’s exact test) were compared between healthy controls and scarred cases, associated P-values are indicated
| Healthy controls | Scarred cases |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 116 | 115 | na |
| Age in years (95% CI) | 37.50 (7.00–65.00) | 38.00 (7.00–65.75) | 0.900 |
| Female, | 84 (72.41) | 80 (69.57) | 0.633 |
Abbreviation: na not applicable, CI Confidence intervals, n number
Participant demographics from the study of TT and matched controls collected between May 2006 and February 2009 in The Gambia. Age (generalised linear model) and gender (Fisher’s exact test) were compared between healthy controls and scarred cases, associated P-values are indicated
| Healthy controls | Scarred cases |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 58 | 58 | na |
| Age in years (95% CI) | 55.50 (30.43–73.73) | 60.00 (34.00–77.88) | 0.199 |
| Female ( | 40 (68.97) | 39 (67.24) | 0.842 |
Abbreviation: na not applicable, CI Confidence intervals, n number
Participant demographics from the study of TT/CO and matched controls from The Gambia in 2011. Age (generalised linear model) and gender (Fisher’s exact test) were compared between healthy controls and scarred cases, associated P-values are indicated
| Healthy controls | Scarred cases |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 38 | 52 | na |
| Age in years (95% CI) | 19.50 (1.00–39.00) | 20.50 (3.55–37.73) | 0.224 |
| Female, | 30 (78.95) | 45 (86.54) | 0.343 |
Abbreviation: na not applicable, CI confidence intervals, n number
Fig. 1Over-representation of late and very early expressed proteins and extracellular, outer membrane and periplasmic proteins in immunogenic antigens. a Proteins identified through transcriptomics as expressed late or very early in the Ct developmental cycle were over-represented in the 230 immunogenic antigens (light grey) compared with the total unfiltered 908 (dark grey). b Proteins with a consensus localisation prediction of extracellular, outer membrane and periplasm were over-represented in the 230 immunogenic antigens (light grey) compared with the total unfiltered 908 (dark grey). Error bars represent standard deviation
Fig. 2No significant differences in diversity of antibody responses between adults with and without scarring. Diversity was measured using Simpson’s diversity index (D-1) (a) and Shannon’s diversity index (H) (b). Median (red lines) and notches were calculated as the median +/- 1.57 x IQR/sqrt of n, where IQR is the interquartile range and n is the number of samples. The IQR times 1.5 was added to the 75th percentile and subtracted from the 25th percentile to determine the whiskers. Dots are outliers
Differentially recognised antigens between adults with and without scarring. Univariate associations were determined using a generalised linear model. Variables were resampled 10,000 times and remodelled to determine permuted P-values (P*). The t-statistic (t) and its standard error, SE(t), are indicated. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of an individual having TT associated with a 1 unit increase in OD are indicated. Area under curve (AUC) for predicting TT status from a generalised linear model including each antigen are indicated
| Antigen |
|
|
| SE( | OR | 95% CI | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT667 | 0.013 | 0.005 | 0.78 | 0.32 | 2.19 | 1.28–4.43 | 0.64 |
| CT645 | 0.036 | 0.029 | 0.56 | 0.27 | 1.76 | 1.09–3.16 | 0.63 |
| CT314 | 0.040 | 0.012 | 0.42 | 0.21 | 1.52 | 1.09–2.43 | 0.66 |
| CT698 | 0.049 | 0.037 | 0.55 | 0.28 | 1.72 | 1.05–3.16 | 0.59 |
| CT471 | 0.051 | 0.023 | 0.59 | 0.30 | 1.80 | 1.08–3.49 | 0.62 |
| CT442 | 0.054 | 0.019 | -0.12 | 0.06 | 0.89 | 0.77–0.98 | 0.63 |
| CT679 | 0.057 | 0.011 | 0.66 | 0.35 | 1.94 | 1.11–4.28 | 0.61 |
| CT425 | 0.070 | 0.049 | 0.51 | 0.28 | 1.66 | 1.04–3.16 | 0.54 |
| CT706 | 0.098 | 0.064 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 1.37 | 1.03–2.19 | 0.57 |
Agreement of differentially recognised antigens identified previously by Lu et al. [31] and in this study. The agreement, or disagreement, between the two analyses on antigens recognised more frequently or strongly by individuals with (scarred) or without (healthy) trachomatous scarring and trichiasis is indicated by ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ on the final column. Kappa = 0.25
| Antigen | Lu et al. [ | This study | Agreement |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT019 | Healthy | None | No |
| CT117 | Healthy | None | No |
| CT301 | Healthy | None | No |
| CT314 | None | Scarred | No |
| CT414 | Scarred | None | No |
| CT425 | None | Scarred | No |
| CT442 | Healthy | Healthy | Yes |
| CT471 | None | Scarred | No |
| CT553 | Healthy | None | No |
| CT556 | Healthy | None | No |
| CT571 | Healthy | None | No |
| CT645 | None | Scarred | No |
| CT667 | Scarred | Scarred | Yes |
| CT679 | None | Scarred | No |
| CT695 | Healthy | None | No |
| CT698 | None | Scarred | No |
| CT706 | Scarred | Scarred | Yes |
| CT709 | Healthy | None | No |
Fig. 3Pgp3 correlation between ELISA and array results. Responses to Pgp3 were retested in 59 arrayed serum using and in-house ELISA. Correlation between ELISA and array results was high. A linear model of results from the ELISA and array was used to fit the line (red)
Fig. 4CT442, CT667 and CT706 correlation between ELISA and array results. Responses to CT442 (a), CT667 (b) and CT706 (c) were retested in 59 arrayed serum using an in-house ELISA. Correlation between ELISA and array results was poor for CT442 (rho 0.26, P = 0.046). Correlation between ELISA and array results for CT667 and CT706 were moderate (rho 0.59 and 0.58, both P < 0.001). A linear model of results from the ELISA and array was used to fit the line (red)
ELISA results from the complete 116 sera and two further scarring case-control studies. The three arrayed antigens were tested on the complete set of 116 sera (2006), 231 samples from a previous scarring case-control study in The Gambia (1995) and a subsequent scarring case-control study in The Gambia (2011). CT442 showed no association with the absence of scarring, and CT667/CT706 were not associated with scarring
| Antigen | Sera | Healthy median (IQR) | Scarred median (IQR) |
| OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT442 | 2006 | 0.24 (0.19–0.33) | 0.27 (0.18–0.33) | 0.368 | 0.33 (0.02–3.36) |
| 1995 | 0.29 (0.18–0.43) | 0.30 (0.15–0.46) | 0.990 | 1.00 (0.46–2.13) | |
| 2011 | 0.31 (0.22–0.38) | 0.36 (0.24–0.48) | 0.023 | 36.19 (2.20–1109.21) | |
| CT667 | 2006 | 0.04 (0.03–0.06) | 0.04 (0.03–0.07) | 0.169 | 2766.28 (0.06–6.20 × 108) |
| 1995 | 0.14 (0.05–0.23) | 0.12 (0.03–0.23) | 0.344 | 0.59 (0.18–1.68) | |
| 2011 | 0.03 (0.02–0.06) | 0.03 (0.02–0.07) | 0.802 | 0.23 (2.47 × 10-6–24,634.90) | |
| CT706 | 2006 | 0.05 (0.03–0.07) | 0.04 (0.03–0.06) | 0.289 | 42.59 (0.07–1.26 × 105) |
| 1995 | 0.14 (0.06–0.23) | 0.12 (0.04–0.23) | 0.307 | 0.58 (0.18–1.57) | |
| 2011 | 0.02 (0.02–0.06) | 0.03 (0.02–0.08) | 0.940 | 1.24 (0.005–619.41) |