Liang Chen1,2, Justin E Wilson2,3, Mark J Koenigsknecht4, Wei-Chun Chou3, Stephanie A Montgomery2,5, Agnieszka D Truax2,3, W June Brickey1,2, Christopher D Packey6, Nitsan Maharshak7, Glenn K Matsushima1,8, Scott E Plevy9, Vincent B Young4, R Balfour Sartor10, Jenny P-Y Ting1,2,3. 1. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 2. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 3. Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 5. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 6. Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. 7. Department of Gastroenterology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. 8. UNC Neuroscience Center and Integrative Program for Biological Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 9. Immunology Research and Development, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA. 10. Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease and the Departments of Medicine, of Microbiology and of Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases involve the dynamic interaction of host genetics, the microbiome and inflammatory responses. Here we found lower expression of NLRP12 (which encodes a negative regulator of innate immunity) in human ulcerative colitis, by comparing monozygotic twins and other patient cohorts. In parallel, Nlrp12 deficiency in mice caused increased basal colonic inflammation, which led to a less-diverse microbiome and loss of protective gut commensal strains (of the family Lachnospiraceae) and a greater abundance of colitogenic strains (of the family Erysipelotrichaceae). Dysbiosis and susceptibility to colitis associated with Nlrp12 deficency were reversed equally by treatment with antibodies targeting inflammatory cytokines and by the administration of beneficial commensal Lachnospiraceae isolates. Fecal transplants from mice reared in specific-pathogen-free conditions into germ-free Nlrp12-deficient mice showed that NLRP12 and the microbiome each contributed to immunological signaling that culminated in colon inflammation. These findings reveal a feed-forward loop in which NLRP12 promotes specific commensals that can reverse gut inflammation, while cytokine blockade during NLRP12 deficiency can reverse dysbiosis.
Inflammatory bowel diseases involve the dynamic interaction of host genetics, the microbiome and inflammatory responses. Here we found lower expression of NLRP12 (which encodes a negative regulator of innate immunity) in human ulcerative colitis, by comparing monozygotic twins and other patient cohorts. In parallel, Nlrp12 deficiency in mice caused increased basal colonic inflammation, which led to a less-diverse microbiome and loss of protective gut commensal strains (of the family Lachnospiraceae) and a greater abundance of colitogenic strains (of the family Erysipelotrichaceae). Dysbiosis and susceptibility to colitis associated with Nlrp12 deficency were reversed equally by treatment with antibodies targeting inflammatory cytokines and by the administration of beneficial commensal Lachnospiraceae isolates. Fecal transplants from mice reared in specific-pathogen-free conditions into germ-free Nlrp12-deficient mice showed that NLRP12 and the microbiome each contributed to immunological signaling that culminated in colon inflammation. These findings reveal a feed-forward loop in which NLRP12 promotes specific commensals that can reverse gut inflammation, while cytokine blockade during NLRP12 deficiency can reverse dysbiosis.
The healthy intestine is inhabited by trillions of bacteria and has evolved a
fine-tuned balance between pathogen recognition and commensal tolerance[1]. In contrast, microbial imbalance,
referred to as dysbiosis, is highly associated with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD),
including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), yet IBD treatment is
limited to immunotherapies. Hence, understanding the host gene-microbiota interaction
that contributes to colitis holds promise in unveiling novel microbiome-based
therapeutic options.A hallmark of IBD is the dysregulated activation of inflammatory cytokines and
signaling pathways such as the NF-κB, MAPK or STAT family members[2]. Several innate immune receptors and
sensors known as NLRs (nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeat proteins or
NOD-like receptors) regulate these pathways. NLRs are a family of intracellular innate
immune sensors that exert either pro- or anti-inflammatory functions. The NLR family
member NOD2 activates NF-κB, and mutations in NOD2 represent
the first genetic association with CD susceptibility[3, 4].
Nod2-deficient mice display gut dysbiosis, which may contribute to
exacerbated colitis[5, 6, 7].
Similarly, loss of the NLRP6 inflammasome is associated with increased pathogenic
colitis-associated microbes[8]. Although
the NLRP12 inflammasome has been implicated in the recognition of specific
infections[9], NLRP12 has
non-inflammasome and anti-inflammatory functions by impeding canonical and non-canonical
NF-κB[10, 11, 12, 13]. Although NLRP12 serves as negative
regulator of inflammatory signaling in experimental colitis in mice, its impact on the
colonic bacterial ecology and translational relevance to humans are completely unknown.
Here, we identified an additional function for NLRP12 in restricting intestinal
inflammation by promoting beneficial Lachnospiraceae strains.
RESULTS
Exacerbated colitis in Nlrp12
mice is microbiota-dependent
NLRP12 performs an anti-inflammatory role in experimental
colitis[12, 13]. To determine if NLRP12 is clinically
relevant to human colitis, we performed a meta-analysis of a paired-comparison
between 10 pairs of monozygotic UC and healthy twins and seven additional UC
patient gene-profiling studies (Fig. 1a and
Supplementary Fig.
1) and found that NLRP12 was significantly
down-regulated in active UC cohorts compared to healthy controls or inactive UC
cohorts. In animals, conventionally-raised
Nlrp12 mice displayed
more severe colitis compared to wild type mice following the oral administration
of 3% dextran sodium sulfate (DSS), which induces experimental colitis.
These differences include significantly increased weight loss, mortality,
histology score and clinical disease symptoms measured as disease-associated
index (DAI), and Nlrp12 mice
exhibited reduced colon length (indication of increased colonic inflammation)
(Fig. 1b–c and Supplementary Fig.
2a–d)[12,
13]. Additionally, the loss
of Nlrp12 resulted in heightened NF-κB, ERK and STAT3
activation (Supplementary Fig.
2e–g). These findings establish a link between reduced
NLRP12 expression and human IBD and consolidate
NLRP12’s protective role in limiting colon inflammation via suppressing
excessive immune signaling.
Figure 1
Microbiota differentiates colitis severity between WT and
Nlrp12 mice.
(a) NLRP12 gene expression between 10 pairs of
monozygotic healthy and UC twins (left panel). Composite of 8 NCBI GEO
ulcerative colitis (UC) studies (right panel) (Supplementary Fig. 1 shows the
other seven individual studies). (b) Body weight and
(c) percent survival of conventionally-raised mice treated with
3% DSS (WT, n=41;
Nlrp12−/−, n=42),
compiled from 4 independent experiments. (d) Body weight,
(e) percent survival, (f) disease-associated index
(DAI) and (g) colon length of germ-free (GF) WT (n=18) and
Nlrp12 (n=19)
mice given 1.5% DSS, compiled from 2 independent experiments.
(h) Blinded histopathology scoring of colons
(n=6/group). (i–k) Representative immunoblots and
densitometry of distal colon proteins from DSS-treated GF mice from 2
independent experiments (n=7/group). (l) Immunoblots and
densitometry of distal colon cytosolic (CYTO) and nuclear (NUC) protein
fractions from untreated specific-pathogen free (SPF) mice (n=9/group).
(m) Schematic comparing GF and conventionalized (exGF) mice.
(n–p) Immunoblots and densitometry of distal colon
proteins from untreated GF and exGF mice (n,p, n=4/group;
o, n=3/group). One dot or one lane represents one
mouse. Error bars show SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01,
***p<0.001 and
****p<0.0001, and n.s. means no significance
by two-tailed paired t test (a, left panel),
unpaired t test (a, right panel, b,
d, f–l, n–p) or
Log-rank (Mantel Cox) test (c and e).
In addition to the association between genetic susceptibility and colon
inflammation, mounting evidence supports a role for the microbiota during IBD
pathogenesis[14, 15, 16]. To assess the impact of the microbiota on the
increased colitis susceptibility in
Nlrp12 mice, we subjected
germ-free (GF) wild-type and
Nlrp12 mice to a low-dose
1.5% DSS in drinking water due to the reported increased sensitivity of
GF mice to DSS[17]. In contrast
to conventionally-raised mice, GF-wild-type and
GF-Nlrp12 mice showed
indistinguishable weight loss, mortality, DAI, colon length and histology scores
following DSS treatment (Fig.
1d–h). Colons from GF-wild-type and
GF-Nlrp12 mice showed
similar levels of activated NF-κB, ERK and STAT3 (Fig. 1i–k). These results implicate a role for
the microbiota in severe colitis found in
Nlrp12 mice.The presence of NLRP12 curtails the activation of inflammatory cell
signaling pathways induced by bacteria-derived ligands[11, 12,
13, 18], which suggests
Nlrp12 mice may present
increased basal colonic inflammation in the presence of resident bacteria at the
steady state. Indeed, colons from naive specific-pathogen free (SPF)
Nlrp12 mice displayed
elevated NF-κB p65 and p52 activation compared to controls (Fig. 1l). Of note, this basal level of
activation was low compared to mice treated with DSS, as these blots required a
longer exposure time to visualize the proteins. To determine the role of NLRP12
in regulating basal colon inflammation in the presence of microbiota, we housed
GF-wild-type and GF-Nlrp12 mice
in a SPF vivarium for 4 weeks (Fig. 1m).
GF-Nlrp12 mice colonized
for 4 weeks (exGF-Nlrp12)
displayed increased colon NF-κB activation compared to control mice
(exGF-wild-type) and animals maintained in sterile isolators (i.e., GF-wild-type
and GF-Nlrp12 mice) at steady
state (Fig. 1n). These results demonstrate
that basally-activated NF-κB immune signaling pathways require
Nlrp12-deficiency and the microbiota from mice housed in
conventional conditions. C-type lectin antimicrobial peptide REG3γ and
cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide (CRAMP) were increased in the
exGF-Nlrp12−/− mice compared to
exGF-wild-type mice and control GF animals (Fig.
1o–p), which agrees with previous work that inflammation
promotes antimicrobial peptides expression resulting in a dysbiotic intestinal
microbiome[19]. These
findings indicate that the intestinal microbiota exacerbated colitis in
Nlrp12 mice.
NLRP12-deficiency results in a dysbiotic microbiome
To determine if NLRP12 alters the microbiome, high throughput 16S rRNA
gene sequencing analysis was performed on fecal bacterial DNA isolated from
untreated wild-type and Nlrp12
mice that were originally generated from the same heterozygous
Nlrp12 parents and raised
in our facilities for more than nine generations. Rarefaction analysis was used
to compare bacterial diversity within individuals of a group[20]. Compared to wild-type mice,
Nlrp12 mice harbored a
microbiota with significantly reduced diversity (Fig. 2a) and a different community composition (Fig. 2b). Comparing within and between group
dissimilarity indicated that the microbiome difference between the wild-type vs.
Nlrp12 mice was
significantly greater than the differences between animals of each genotype
(Fig. 2c, calculated from Fig. 2b). Housing and diet are key factors
that can influence the intestinal microbiota[21]; thus, we repeated the microbiome analysis three years
later with mice housed in a second vivarium with different formula chow and
observed similar findings (Supplementary Fig. 3a–c). These results demonstrate that
Nlrp12 mice retained this
altered microbiome in different housing conditions.
Figure 2
Nlrp12-deficiency results in a dysbiotic colonic microbiome.
(a) Bacterial diversity and (b) unweighted UniFrac
principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showing microbiota compositional
differences between WT (n=9) and
Nlrp12 (n=8) mice
from one experiment in vivarium #1. A second independent experiment was
performed in vivarium #2 (Supplementary Fig. 3). Each symbol
represents one mouse. (c) Quantification of UniFrac distance from
(b) indicated as dissimilarity values. (d)
Bacterial diversity of Nlrp12+/+
(n=10) and Nlrp12
(n=14) littermates, compiled from 2 independent experiments.
(e) Consistently altered intestinal bacterial groups in
Nlrp12 vs. WT mice from
experiments described in (a–d and Supplementary Fig. 3).
(f) Venn diagram showing overlapped microbiota changes between
Nlrp12 vs. WT mice and
IBD vs. healthy individuals (Supplementary Table 4 provides detailed information). Error bars
denote SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01,
***p<0.001 and
****p<0.0001 determined by two-tailed
unpaired t test (a, d, and
e) or ANOSIM test (c). The Tukey’s boxplot
indicates the first (bottom of the box) and third quartiles (top of the box).
The line inside the box represents the median, and the ends of the whiskers
indicate the 1.5 interquartile ranges of the upper or lower quartiles
(c).
Because the analyzed wild-type and
Nlrp12 mice had been bred
separately for multiple generations, it is possible that familial transmission
instead of NLRP12-deficiency was responsible for the altered
microbiome[22].
Therefore, we analyzed feces from wild-type and
Nlrp12 littermates
birthed from the same Nlrp12 heterozygous parents
(Nlrp12) and housed
separately by genotype after weaning (Supplementary Fig. 3d). Compared to
wild-type littermates, Nlrp12
mice from this heterozygous mating harbored a microbiota with significantly
reduced diversity (Fig. 2d) and increased
dissimilarity (Supplementary
Fig. 3e) compared to wild-type littermates.To establish rigor of the microbiota results, we used high throughput 16S
rRNA gene sequencing to characterize the microbiome of naive wild-type and
Nlrp12 mice in three
mouse cohorts (vivarium 1, vivarium 2 and littermate studies) (Supplementary Tables
1–3)
and observed a consistent decrease in Bacteroidales,
Clostridiales and Lachnospiraceae and an
increase in Erysipelotrichaceae in the
Nlrp12 mice compared to
wild-type animals (Fig. 2e). This is
noteworthy, as IBD patients have been reported to display a similar microbiome
profile[14, 16, 23] (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Table 4).
Thus, we focused on these bacterial groups in further studies.
Fecal transplantation attenuates disease in
Nlrp12 mice
To determine if the altered microbiome observed in
Nlrp12 mice is
responsible for the exacerbated colon inflammation in
Nlrp12 mice, we conducted
microbiota transfer studies by cohousing mice, which leads to the exchange of
the microbiota through coprophagia[8,
24, 25]. Age-and-sex matched wild-type and
Nlrp12 mice were either
single-housed (SiHo) or cohoused (CoHo) for six weeks prior to 3% DSS
treatment (Fig. 3a). Control single-housed
wild-type and Nlrp12 mice showed
significant differences in disease severity (Fig.
3b–f). After receiving DSS,
Nlrp12 mice that were
cohoused with wild-type mice (CoHo
Nlrp12) displayed reduced
disease and immune signaling compared to their SiHo
Nlrp12 littermates (Fig. 3b–i and Supplementary Fig. 4a). Moreover,
CoHo Nlrp12 and wild-type
cage-mates were similar in all measurements (Fig.
3b–i). As a control, cohousing wild-type animals with
inflammasome-deficient Asc mice
failed to ameliorate colitis in DSS-treated
Asc mice, but instead
increased death, DAI and histopathology in wild-type mice as reported (Supplementary Fig.
4b–f)[8]. This
is in contrast to improved survival and lessened colitis in CoHo
Nlrp12 mice and makes
Nlrp12-deficiency the first case where elevated colitis
susceptibility resulting from an NLR deficiency can be reversed by transferring
normal microbiota.
Figure 3
Nlrp12−/− mice co-housed with WT mice
display attenuated colitis. (a) Schematic of cohousing (CoHo) vs.
single-housing (SiHo) strategy, fecal microbiome sequencing and DSS treatment of
WT and Nlrp12 mice.
(b) Body weight and (c) percent survival
(† indicates statistical significance between SiHo WT vs.
SiHo Nlrp12−/−, and *
indicates significance between SiHo
Nlrp12−/− vs. CoHo
Nlrp12−/−), (d) DAI
and (e) colon length of littermate mice treated as illustrated in
(a) (SiHo WT, n=16; SiHo
Nlrp12−/−, n=18; CoHo
WT, n=12; CoHo Nlrp12−/−,
n=12), compiled from 3 independent experiments. (f)
Histopathology scoring of colons (n=10/group).
(g–i) Representative immunoblots and densitometry of distal
colon proteins from the single- and cohoused mice from 3 independent
experiments. (j) PCoA plot showing fecal microbial composition
after cohousing (n=9/group). (k) Quantification of UniFrac
distance between mice from (j) after cohousing, indicated as
dissimilarity values. (l) Significantly altered strains identified
by two-way ANOVA test from all sequenced bacteria in SiHo WT, SiHo and CoHo
Nlrp12−/− mice
(n=9/group). One dot or one lane represents one mouse. Error bars show
SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01,
***p<0.001,
****p<0.0001 and n.s. means no significance
determined using two-tailed unpaired t test (b),
Log-rank (Mantel Cox) test (c), one-way ANOVA Fisher’s LSD
test (d–i), ANOSIM test (k) and two-way ANOVA
(l).
To investigate detailed microbiome changes after cohousing wild-type
mice with Nlrp12 mice, we
performed 16S rRNA gene microbiome sequencing analysis on feces from wild-type
and Nlrp12 mice before and after
cohousing (Fig. 3a). Consistent with Fig. 2, we observed significantly different
community composition between the wild-type and
Nlrp12 mice before
cohousing (Supplementary Fig.
4g–h). After six weeks of cohousing, the microbiota
composition of the cohoused
Nlrp12 mice was more similar
to that of the wild-type mice and distinct from the single-housed
Nlrp12 littermates (Fig. 3j). The microbiome dissimilarity
between cohoused and single-housed
Nlrp12 mice was similar to
that of control single-housed wild-type vs.
Nlrp12 mice (Fig. 3k, calculated from Fig. 3j). Thus,
Nlrp12 mice cohoused with
wild-type mice developed a microbiota that was closer in community structure to
that of wild-type animals. To assess if the transferred microbiota resulted in
changes in specific bacteria, we performed a two-way ANOVA test on all sequenced
fecal bacteria identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The
Clostridiales order and Lachnospiraceae
family were significantly higher in frequency, and
Erysipelotrichaceae was lower in the cohoused
Nlrp12 mice compared to
the single-housed Nlrp12 mice
(Fig. 3l). These data demonstrate that
transferred microbiota from wild-type mice ameliorated disease susceptibility in
Nlrp12 mice in a
co-housing setting.The experiments utilizing
Nlrp12 and
Nlrp12 littermate mice
and GF animals suggest NF-κB dysregulation occurs prior to alterations
in the microbiota, as Nlrp12 mice
developed a different microbiome from that of
Nlrp12 littermates after
weaning (Fig. 2d–e), and GF
Nlrp12 mice display
increased basal colon inflammation when colonized (Fig. 1n). However, compared to single-housed
Nlrp12 mice, cohoused
Nlrp12 mice displayed
attenuated NF-κB activation during DSS-induced colitis, suggesting the
altered microbiota in Nlrp12 mice
also contributes to heightened NF-κB activation (Fig. 3g). To investigate the causality between
NF-κB hyperactivation and altered microbiota in
Nlrp12 mice, we performed
reciprocal fecal transplantation experiments in which GF wild-type mice were
reconstituted with the microbiota of SPF
Nlrp12 mice, and GF
Nlrp12 mice were
reconstituted with the microbiota of SPF wild-type mice via oral gavage once a
week for 3 weeks as described[24]. The animals were given a one-week rest period where no
fecal transfer was performed, and the mice were then exposed to DSS in drinking
water for 5 days. Transfer of the fecal microbiota (FM) from an SPF wild-type
donor into GF wild-type mice (designated as FMwild-type→GF
wild-type) resulted in significantly reduced DSS-induced colitis, survival and
disease index, but greater colon length compared to the transfer of FM from an
SPF Nlrp12 donor into GF
Nlrp12 mice
(FM→GF
Nlrp12) (Fig. 4a–d). However,
FMwild-type→GF
Nlrp12 and
FM→GF
wild-type mice exhibited similar weight loss, survival, disease index and colon
length, which were less severe compared to control
FM−/−→GF
Nlrp12 mice (Fig. 4a–d). This indicates that
Nlrp12-shaped microbiome
and genetic deficiency in Nlrp12 are both required to produce
the fulminant colitis in Nlrp12
mice. Next, we examined the contribution of FM vs. host genetics on immune
signaling pathways (Fig. 4e). As expected,
colon samples from control FMwild-type→GF wild-type mice
exhibited minimal NF-κB and STAT3 activation, whereas
FM→GF
Nlrp12 samples showed
elevated p52, pp65 and pSTAT3. Colons from
FM→GF
wild-type and FMwild-type→GF
Nlrp12 mice showed
intermediate, but distinct activation patterns.
FM→GF
wild-type colons had elevated pp65 similar to
FM→GF
Nlrp12 colons, but
reduced p52 nuclear translocation and STAT3 activation. By contrast,
FMwild-type→GF
Nlrp12 colons showed
elevated p52 and pSTAT3, but modest pp65 activation. These results indicate that
both the microbiome in Nlrp12
animals and Nlrp12 gene deficiency are required to cause the
full activation of p52, p65 and STAT3 and fulminant colitis.
Figure 4
Transferring microbiota from
Nlrp12 mice induces colonic
inflammation. (a) Body weight, (b) percent survival,
(c) DAI and (d) colon length of GF WT vs. GF
Nlrp12 mice reconstituted
with fecal material (FM) from SPF WT or
Nlrp12 mice and treated
with DSS (FMWT→GF WT, n=11;
FM−/−→GF
WT, n=10; FMWT→GF
Nlrp12, n=9; and
FM−/−→GF
Nlrp12, n=9),
compiled from 2 independent experiments. (e) Immunoblots and
densitometry of distal colon proteins from mice described in
(a–d). Error bars show SEM. *p<0.05,
**p<0.01, ***p<0.001,
****p<0.0001 and n.s. indicates no
significance determined using two-tailed unpaired t test (a, e),
Log-rank (Mantel Cox) test (b) and one-way ANOVA Fisher’s
LSD test (c–d).
Lachnospiraceae suppresses colitis in
Nlrp12−/− mice
Figure 3 showed that
Clostridiales order and Lachnospiraceae
family were significantly higher, and Erysipelotrichaceae was
lower in Nlrp12 mice compared to
wild-type mice. Lachnospiraceae strains are decreased in
CD[14, 16, 23], and Lachnospiraceae limits experimental
C. difficile-induced colitis[26]. To determine if bacterial groups that
are lacking in Nlrp12 mice can
restrict colitis, we inoculated wild-type and
Nlrp12 mice with 23
strains of Lachnospiraceae via oral gavage for 21 days followed
by one week of rest before DSS treatment (Fig.
5a). Mice given Lachnospiraceae and brain-heart
infusion (BHI) vehicle control, which was used to grow
Lachnospiraceae, had similar weight prior to DSS treatment
(Fig. 5a, left panel).
Strikingly, DSS-treated Nlrp12
mice given Lachnospiraceae displayed reduced colitis including
reduced weight loss, DAI, colon histopathology and increased colon lengths
compared to Nlrp12 mice given
vehicle control (Fig. 5a–d and
Supplementary Fig.
5). Proinflammatory cytokines (Fig.
5e) and canonical and non-canonical NF-κB, ERK and STAT3
showed similar reductions (Fig.
5f–h).
Figure 5
Administration of Lachnospiraceae suppresses colitis in
Nlrp12 mice.
(a) Body weight of WT and
Nlrp12 mice administered
Lachnospiraceae (Lachno) or BHI vehicle (left panel) and
DSS (right panel), with (b) DAI and (c) colon length
after DSS treatment (WT BHI, n=24; WT Lachno, n=33;
Nlrp12 BHI, n=22;
Nlrp12 Lachno,
n=22), compiled from 3 independent experiments. (d)
Histopathology scoring of BHI- or Lachno-treated mice given DSS (WT BHI,
n=4; WT Lachno, n=4;
Nlrp12 BHI, n=5;
Nlrp12 Lachno,
n=4). (e) Colon explant culture cytokines (WT BHI,
n=9; WT Lachno, n=9;
Nlrp12 BHI, n=14;
Nlrp12 Lachno,
n=8), and (f–h) representative immunoblots with
densitometry of distal colon proteins from DSS-treated mice given BHI or Lachno
from 3 independent experiments (n=7/group). (i) Bacterial
diversity and (j) PCoA plot showing microbiome compositional
differences quantified by (k) UniFrac distances among the mice
administered Lachno or BHI prior to DSS (WT BHI, n=7; WT Lachno,
n=8; Nlrp12 BHI,
n=7; Nlrp12 Lachno,
n=8). (l) Significantly altered strains among all
identified intestinal bacteria by 16s rRNA gene sequencing following Lachno
administration. One dot or one lane represents one mouse. Error bars show SEM.
*p<0.05, **p<0.01,
***p<0.001,
****p<0.0001 and n.s. means no significance
determined using unpaired t test (a, i), one-way
ANOVA Fisher’s LSD test (b–h), ANOSIM test
(k) and two-way ANOVA (l).
To examine whether Lachnospiraceae modulates severity
of inflammation by altering the composition of the microbiota of
Nlrp12 mice, we sequenced
the microbiome of the mice receiving Lachnospiraceae or control
BHI. For both wild-type and
Nlrp12 mice, the diversity of
the microbiota from Lachnospiraceae-receiving mice was
significantly increased compared to BHI-treated littermates, although the impact
was greater in Nlrp12 mice (Fig. 5i). UniFrac distance analysis was used
to quantify the dissimilarity between bacterial communities among the groups.
The distance between the BHI-treated
Nlrp12 mice vs.
Lachnospiraceae-treated
Nlrp12 mice was as large
as the distance between the control BHI-treated wild-type vs. BHI-treated
Nlrp12 mice (Fig. 5j–k), indicating that the
microbiome in Lachnospiraceae-treated
Nlrp12 mice was
significantly distinct from that of littermate control
Nlrp12 mice given BHI.
Additionally, the dissimilarity distance between the BHI-treated wild-type and
Lachnospiraceae-treated
Nlrp12 mice was
significantly decreased compared to the distance between the BHI-treated
Nlrp12 mice and
Lachnospiraceae-treated
Nlrp12 mice (Fig. 5k), suggesting that
Nlrp12 mice administered
Lachnospiraceae develop a microbiome more reminiscent of
wild-type animals. Among all the strains sequenced (Supplementary Table. 5),
administration of Lachnospiraceae promoted the growth of
Clostridiales in
Nlrp12 mice, but
significantly reduced Erysipelotrichaceae (Fig. 5l). As the abundance of
Erysipelotrichaceae was increased in the
Nlrp12 mice, which
positively correlated with disease severity (Fig.
3b–f), administration of Lachnospiraceae may
limit colitis in part by suppressing expansion of
Erysipelotrichaceae.
Increased intestinal inflammation in
Nlrp12 mice is driven by
both hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic components[12, 13], but the cellular compartment expressing NLRP12 that shapes
the intestinal commensals is unknown. To address this, we generated radiation
bone marrow chimeric mice by lethally irradiating wild-type and
Nlrp12 mice and then
transferred bone marrow from wild-type and
Nlrp12 donors to generate
wild-type mice containing myeloid cells deficient in Nlrp12
(Nlrp12→wild-type)
and Nlrp12 mice expressing
Nlrp12 only in myeloid cells
(wild-type→Nlrp12).
We then assessed the microbiome after a 10-week-reconstituition period (Fig. 6a). As expected, control wild-type mice
given wild-type bone marrow retained greater microbiota diversity than
Nlrp12 recipients with
Nlrp12 bone marrow (Fig. 6b). Wild-type mice with
Nlrp12 bone marrow
(Nlrp12→wild-type)
displayed reduced bacterial diversity compared to wild-type→wild-type
mice. Additionally, transplantation of wild-type bone marrow into
Nlrp12 mice
(wild-type→Nlrp12)
increased bacterial diversity compared to control
Nlrp12→Nlrp12
mice (Fig. 6b). These results indicate that
NLRP12 expression in the hematopoietic compartment dominantly shapes the
diversity of the intestinal bacteria. Analysis of bacterial composition
confirmed these findings (Fig.
6c–d).
Figure 6
NLRP12 expression by hematopoietic cells prevents intestinal dysbiosis.
(a) Schematic illustrating bone-marrow transplantation (BMT)
and fecal DNA collection for microbiome analysis. (b) Bacterial
diversity, (c) PCoA plot and (d) UniFrac distance
plots showing microbiome compositional differences in WT and
Nlrp12 mice after BMT
(n=8/group), compiled from 2 independent experiments. One dot represents
one mouse. (e) Representative concatenated flow cytometry plots,
and (f) quantification of colonic lamina propria macrophage and DC
subpopulations in SPF mice. Each dot contains pooled cells isolated and sorted
from the colons of 2–3 mice. (g) RT-qPCR of proinflammatory
cytokines expressed by colon resident macrophages (9 technical replicates/group)
and DCs (6 technical replicates/group) stimulated with cecal contents, compiled
from 2 independent experiments. Error bars show SEM. *p<0.05,
**p<0.01, ***p<0.001,
****p<0.0001 and n.s. means no significance
determined using two-tailed unpaired t test (b,
f and g) and ANOSIM test (d).
We next characterized the hematopoietic cells in the colon lamina
propria (cLP) that could be contributing to increased basal inflammation in
Nlrp12 mice. Although
NLRP12 suppresses inflammatory pathways in bone marrow-derived
macrophages[13, 18] and DCs[12], there is no evidence to support a role
for NLRP12 in colonic macrophages and DCs, which are phenotypically different
from their bone marrow-derived counterparts[27]. Within the cLP, colon resident macrophages are
identified as two subsets that express the fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1), F4/80
and CD11b with or without coexpression of CD11c. DCs within the cLP express
CD11c and CD103 and are considered CD11b negative or low (Fig. 6e)[28]. To analyze the impact of NLRP12 on these macrophage and DC
populations in the steady state, we isolated cLP cells from naive wild type and
Nlrp12 mice and gated on
CD45+I-Ab+ cells with differential
expression of F4/80, CD11b, CD11c and CD103 by flow cytometry. In accordance
with increased colonic inflammation in SPF
Nlrp12 mice, these mice
displayed a significantly increased frequency of
CD11c+CD11blo cells (designated R3 in Fig. 6e, left panels) and a modestly
increased frequency of CD11cloCD11b+ (R1) and
CD11c+CD11b+ (R2) populations. These
R1–R3 fractions were further stained for F4/80 and CD103. In wild type
and Nlrp12 mice, the R1 and R2
populations were found to be primarily macrophages, and R3 were DCs (Fig. 6e, right panels). The composite data of
multiple animals showed an increased frequency of
CD11bloCD11c+F4/80−CD103+
DCs in the lamina propria of
Nlrp12 mice (Fig. 6f). The frequency of
CD11b+CD11cloF4/80+CD103−
and
CD11b+CD11c+F4/80+CD103−
populations, which were characterized as macrophages, were also increased in
Nlrp12 mice, but this
difference was not significant (Fig. 6f).
These results suggest that Nlrp12 deficiency increased
CD11bloCD11c+F4/80−CD103+
colonic DCs.To maintain colon homeostasis, macrophages and DCs in the cLP acquire
anti-inflammatory phenotypes[29]
and become anergic to bacterial stimulation[27]. To test if NLRP12 plays a role in maintaining colonic
macrophage and DC quiescence, we exposed cLP macrophages and DCs from naive
wild-type and Nlrp12 mice to
cecal contents from wild-type animals to mimic the cell-resident bacterial
interactions in vivo. Consistent with the concept that cLP
macrophages and DCs are anergic to bacterial stimulation[27], cecal content exposure did not increase
inflammatory cytokine gene expression in wild-type macrophages and DCs with the
exception of a slight increase in Il23a (encoding p19)
expressed by wild-type DCs (Fig. 6g). By
contrast, cecal contents significantly increased Il6, Tnf,
Il12b (encoding p40) and Il23a expression in
Nlrp12
CD11b+CD11c+ macrophages and
CD11bloCD11c+ DCs compared to wild-type
controls (Fig. 6g). Only
Tnf was significantly elevated in
Nlrp12
CD11b+CD11clo macrophages after exposure to
cecal contents. These results suggest that NLRP12 maintains homeostasis in
colonic macrophages and DCs in the presence of cecal material.
TNF and IL-6 cause microbial dysbiosis in
Nlrp12 mice
The findings above (Fig. 4)
indicate that the Nlrp12 deficiency and
Nlrp12-derived microbiome
resulted in elevated inflammation. We next directly tested if increased
inflammation could drive microbial dysbiosis. Anti-TNF antibody is a common
treatment for IBD patients[30],
while anti-IL-6R antibody has been discussed as a new therapeutic strategy for
colitis[31, 32]. We targeted the inflammatory cytokines
TNF and IL-6 in vivo by injecting mice with anti-TNF and
anti-IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) antibodies (Ab) prior to and during DSS exposure
(Supplementary Fig.
6a–b). Blocking TNF and IL-6 signaling ameliorated
DSS-induced colitis in Nlrp12
mice indicated by significantly improved weight gain, survival and clinical
scores (Fig. 7a–c), while the
impact was less pronounced in wild-type controls.
Figure 7
Anti-IL-6R and anti-TNF suppresses colitis and restores the missing bacterial
groups in Nlrp12 mice.
(a) Body weight, (b) percent survival
(† indicates statistical significance between WT PBS vs.
Nlrp12 PBS; *
indicates significance between
Nlrp12 PBS vs.
Nlrp12 Ab) and
(c) DAI of DSS-treated WT and
Nlrp12 mice injected i.p.
with anti-IL-6R and anti-TNF antibodies (Ab) or PBS (n=13/group),
compiled from 3 independent experiments. (d) Intestinal microbial
diversity, and (e) PCoA showing microbiota compositional
differences in Ab-treated WT and
Nlrp12 mice
(n=6/group). (f) Quantification of UniFrac distances from
(e). (g) Significantly altered groups from
sequenced bacteria in Ab- vs. PBS-treated animals. Error bars show SEM.
*p<0.05, **p<0.01,
***p<0.001,
****p<0.0001 and n.s. indicates no
significance determined by two-tailed unpaired t test
(a and d), Log-rank (Mantel Cox) test
(b), one-way ANOVA Fisher’s LSD test (c),
ANOSIM test (f) or two-way ANOVA (g).
To determine if Ab treatment reversed dysbiosis in
Nlrp12 mice, we performed
microbiome analysis before and after Ab treatment. Prior to Ab treatment, naive
Nlrp12 mice displayed
significantly altered microbiome compared to wild-type mice (Supplementary Fig. 6c–e).
However, anti-TNF- and anti-IL-6R-treated
Nlrp12 mice displayed
significantly increased intestinal bacterial diversity compared to PBS-treated
Nlrp12 mice (Fig. 7d) and reduced microbiome compositional
differences compared to wild-type mice (Fig.
7e–f), with elevated Bacteroidales and
Clostridiales taxa (Fig.
7g). By contrast, PBS-treated
Nlrp12 mice maintained
significantly reduced bacterial diversity, Bacteroidales and
Clostridiales compared to wild-type mice. These results
indicate that blocking excessive inflammatory cytokines recovered the altered
microbiome and reduced colitis in
Nlrp12 mice.
DISCUSSION
NLRP12 has a protective role in intestinal inflammation by suppressing
canonical and noncanonical NF-κB[12, 13]. In this study,
we identified an additional critical role for NLRP12 by regulating gut microbial
communities. IBD-profiling studies revealed that NLRP12 expression
is negatively correlated with active UC. In addition, an imbalance in the intestinal
microbiota, or dysbiosis, has been linked to IBD pathogenesis[14, 15, 16]. We reveal a link between these
two clinical observations by providing direct evidence that NLRP12 promotes
microbial symbiosis, which results in reduced colitis susceptibility.Unlike conventionally-raised
Nlrp12 mice, which are more
susceptible to colitis compared to similarly raised wild-type animals,
Nlrp12 mice raised under
germ-free conditions were indistinguishable from GF-wild-type mice during
experimental colitis. This indicates interactions between host cells and resident
bacteria are required for the severe disease susceptibility in
Nlrp12 mice. Intestinal
microbial diversity and human disease have a complex reciprocal cause and effect
relationship. A reduction of gut microbiome richness is a biomarker for human
metabolic and inflammatory disorders[33], including IBD[24]. Loss of commensal diversity due to genetic
alterations[34] or an
unhealthy diet[35] correlates with
exacerbated colitis. Our results indicate that NLRP12 acts a central component of
this relationship by curtailing excessive inflammatory cytokine production to limit
intestinal inflammation and maintain commensal diversity and protective microbiota.
Neutralization of TNF is a current IBD therapy, and targeting IL-6R is being
assessed as a similar therapeutic approach. Our findings indicate that in addition
to suppressing inflammatory signaling, targeting these cytokines may also alleviate
colitis by reversing dysbiosis.Many protective intestinal bacterial groups are necessary for maintaining
gut homeostasis. Similar to the microbiota found in CD patients[14], we observed a decrease in
Bacteroidales and Clostridiales (in particular
Lachnospiraceae) strains in untreated
Nlrp12 mice, which correlated
with a greater sensitivity to DSS-induced colitis. Nod2- or
Nlrp6-deficiency results in a colitogenic microbiota that can
exacerbate colitis[5, 6, 7, 8]. In contrast, this is the first
observation where dysbiosis and colitis severity caused by loss of an NLR can be
reversed by transferring the microbiota from wild-type animals, further supporting
our conclusion that NLRP12 plays a predominate role in maintaining protective
commensal bacterial groups and limiting colitogenic strains. In line with this,
Nlrp12 mice cohoused with
wild-type mice exhibited elevated intestinal Clostridiales and
Lachnospiraceae, decreased Erysipelotrichaceae
and reduced DSS-induced colitis. Although Lachnospiraceae are
decreased in IBD patients[14, 16, 23, 36, 37] and Clostridium
difficile-associated colitis[38], little is known about how these protective strains impact the
host immune system. Lachnospiraceae are more enriched in the
mucosal folds compared to the central lumen[39]. The spatial location of Lachnospiraceae
favors their interaction with lamina propria residual immune cells, which suggests
Lachnospiraceae may function as an immune regulator to prevent
enteric pathogen adhesion/colonization. Lachnospiraceae are also
major producers of the short chain fatty acid (SCFA) propionate in the human
gut[40], which promotes
peripheral regulatory T cell generation[41, 42]. Loss of
Lachnospiraceae species in the
Nlrp12 mice may result in
reduced SCFA production, which could contribute to elevated inflammation in
Nlrp12 mice. Moreover, there
is a negative correlation between intestinal Lachnospiraceae and
Erysipelotrichaceae. Erysipelotrichaceae have been linked to
elevated TNF levels and chronic intestinal inflammation in SIV-infected animals and
HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy[43, 44],
which suggest these organisms appear to be highly inflammatory. In agreement with
these findings, we showed that Erysipelotrichaceae-enriched fecal
microbiota from Nlrp12 mice induced
more NF-κB and STAT3 activation. Lachnospiraceae may
provide a protective function in part by suppressing over-growth of intestinal
Erysipelotrichaceae. Accompanied by the human gene profile
outcome where mucosal NLRP12 expression is reduced in active
colitis, our results suggest that Lachnospiraceae may be
therapeutic when applied to UC subjects with reduced NLRP12
expression.In sum, reciprocal fecal transplantation experiments, cohousing and bacteria
transfer experiments collectively indicate that the interaction between aberrant
immune signaling and dysbiotic microbiota in
Nlrp12 animals does not
proceed in a one-way linear trajectory, but instead in a vicious feed-forward cycle
in which increased inflammation driven by loss of NLRP12 expression produces a
proinflammatory microbiota that further escalates inflammation (Supplementary Fig. 7).
METHODS
Mice
All animal procedures were approved by the University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill (UNC) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) according
to US National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals. Animal numbers were empirically determined to optimize numbers
necessary for statistical significance based on our previous reports utilizing
these disease models (minimum of 4–7 animals/group). Animals were
excluded if exhibiting signs of disease not associated with the conditions of
the colitis (e.g., fight wounds and malocclusion). No randomization method was
used due to the single-housing and co-housing strategy required for the
microbiome studies, ad libitum administration of DSS in
drinking water and use of littermate controls.Wild type (WT) C57BL/6J mice were obtained from Jackson laboratory and
house-raised at UNC for at least 9 generations.
Nlrp12 and
Asc mice are on C57BL/6J
background after at least 9 generations of backcross. Conventionally raised mice
were bred and housed in specific-pathogen-free (SPF) conditions, and germ-free
(GF) animals were generated and housed in the National Gnotobiotic Rodent
Resource Center of North Carolina at Chapel Hill or in the Center for
Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Gnotobiotic Core at North Carolina State
University. For cohousing experiments, 4-week old mice originating from the same
breeders were divided for either single-housed (SiHo) or cohoused (CoHo) with
age- and sex-matched mice for 6 weeks. CoHo mice were compared to their SiHo
littermates as controls. For conventionalization study, GF animals were
transferred into SPF condition and housed for 4 weeks. Conventionalized (exGF)
animals were compared to mice kept in the GF condition as controls. For the
reciprocal fecal transplantation study, GF wild-type or
Nlrp12 mice were orally
gavaged once a week for three weeks with a PBS suspension of feces derived from
SPF wild-type or Nlrp12 mice
following the previously described protocol[24]. The mice were given DSS 1 week after the final gavage.
For adoptive bone marrow transplantation study, wild-type and
Nlrp12 chimeric mice were
generated as previously described[12]. No antibiotics were used during the reconstitution phase,
and fecal DNA was collected 10 weeks after the transplantation for microbiome
analysis.
Experimental Colitis
Experimental colitis was initiated by treating mice with
1.5%–3% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)
(36,000–50,000 M.Wt, MP Biomedicals) in autoclaved drinking water for 5
days as indicated. DSS was then replaced by normal autoclaved water for
6–7 days. Body weight was monitored daily, and disease-associated index
(DAI) was determined by an investigator blinded to experimental conditions on
day 8 post-DSS treatment according to the following parameters: 1) Weight loss
(0 points=0% weight loss from baseline, 1
point=1–5% weight loss, 2
points=5–10% weight loss, 3
points=10–20% weight loss and 4 points=more than
20% weight loss); 2) Rectal bleeding (0 points=negative, 2
points=positive hemoccult test and 4 points=gross bleeding); and
3) Stool consistency (0 points=normal, 2 points=semiformed stool
and 4 points=liquid that adhere to the anus). The sum of these 3
parameters results in the total DAI ranging from 0 (healthy) to 12 (maximal
activity of colitis)[12].
Histopathology
Colons were Swiss-rolled, fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin
and paraffin embedded and processed for histological analysis. Five-micron-thick
colon sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and
semi-quantitatively scored for histopathology by a board-certified veterinary
pathologist in a blind manner. Histology score represented the sum of each
histological alterations outlined below. This system assessed inflammation,
epithelial defects, area of inflammation, area of epithelial defect, crypt
atrophy and dysplasia/neoplasia by giving each parameter a separate score
(0–4) for severity and extent as previously described[12].
Immunoblotting
Colons were excised, opened longitudinally and washed with cold PBS. The
distal-most-3 cm section of each colon was collected and mechanically
homogenized in NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagent (Thermo
Scientific) containing Complete Protease Inhibitor and PhosphoStop (Roche) per
manufacturer’s protocol. Cytosolic and nuclear lysates were subjected to
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. The following primary antibodies were use for
immunoblot analysis: anti-pIκBα (Ser32) (14D4) (cat. no 2859);
anti-pIKKα/β (Ser176/180) (16A6) (cat. no. 2697); anti-pp65
(Ser536) (93H1) (cat. no. 3033); anti-NIK (cat. no. 4994); anti-pERK1/2
(Thr202/Tyr204) (D13.14.4E) (cat. no. 4370); anti-p65 (D14E12) (cat. no. 8242);
anti-pSTAT3 (Tyr705) (cat. no. 9131); and anti-STAT3 (79D7) (cat. no. 4904)
(Cell Signaling Technology); anti-p52 (C-5) (cat. no. sc-7386); anti-ERK1 (C-16)
(cat. no. sc-93); anti-ERK2 (C-14) (cat. no. sc-154); anti-CRAMP (G-1) (cat. no.
sc-166055) and anti-Actin-HRP (C-11) (cat. no. sc-1615) (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology); anti-REG3γ (cat. no. ab198216) (Abcam); and anti-Histone
H3 (cat. no. 07-690) (Millipore). Goat anti-rabbit-HRP (cat. no. 111-035-144)
and goat anti-mouse-HRP (cat. no. 115-035-146) (Jackson Laboratories) were used
as secondary antibodies. Protein densitometry were quantified by Image J
software.
Colon Explant Cultures
Colons were excised, washed several times in cold PBS containing 2x
penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma Aldrich) and cultured for 15 hours in RPMI media
(Gibco) containing 2x penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C. Supernatants were
collected, centrifuged to clear debris and assessed for cytokines by Luminex
Bio-Plex System per manufacturers instructions.
Fecal DNA Extraction
Fecal samples were collected from live mice, snap-frozen and stored at
−80°C. DNA was isolated by incubating fecal material at
65°C for 30 min in Lysing Matrix E tubes (MP Biomedicals) containing 200
mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris, 20 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), SDS and proteinase K (Qiagen).
Phenol:Choloroform:Isoamyl alcohol (Invitrogen) was added, and the samples were
homogenized at 4°C for 3 min using a bead beater homogenizer. The
samples were centrifuged at 8000 rpms for 3 min at 4°C, and the
supernatant was incubated with Phenol:Chloroform (Invitrogen) for 10 min at room
temperature. The samples were centrifuged at 13,000 rpms for 5 min at
4°C, and the aqueous phase was incubated with isopropanol and 3M sodium
acetate, pH 5.2, at −20°C for 15 hrs to precipitate DNA. The
precipitated DNA was collected by centrifugation at 13000 rpm at 4°C for
20 min, washed twice with 100% cold ethanol and resuspended in TE
buffer. The DNA was further purified using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit
(Qiagen) according to the manufactures protocol.
16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and Data Analysis
Fecal DNA samples were amplified by PCR using barcoded primer pairs
targeting the V1–V2 region of the 16S gene. PCR amplicons were sequenced
at the V1–V2 region using Roche 454 for the vivarium #1
study[37], and the same
V1–V2 region was sequenced using an Mi-Seq Illumina sequencer[38] for all other described
experiments. The resulting bacterial sequence fragments were clustered into
Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) and aligned to microbial genes with
97% sequence similarity from Greengenes Database using UCLUST method in
QIIME. Bacterial taxa summarization and rarefaction analyses of microbial
diversity or compositional differences (dissimilarity value indicated by
Unweighted UniFrac Distance) were calculated in QIIME (1.8.0) as previously
described[20] using
QIIME scripts (including pick_open_reference_otus.py, summarize_taxa.py,
alpha_rarefaction.py, jackknifed_beta_diversity.py and
make_distance_boxplots.py). PCoA plots indicating compositional difference were
generated by QIIME script, make_2d_plots.py. Each point represents one mouse,
and the ellipses represent the interquartile range (IQR) during the rarefaction
analyses[45] (see
http://www.wernerlab.org/teaching/qiime/overview for scripts
details). All 16S rRNA microbiome sequences have been deposited in the European
Nucleotide Archive (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena)
and QIITA (https://qiita.ucsd.edu). The accession codes are listed in the
Data Availability section.
Mouse colonic lamina propria macrophage and dendritic cells isolation and
stimulation
Mouse colons were opened longitudinally and washed with cold PBS to
remove the fecal contents. Pooled colons from 2 mice were further cut into 1.5
cm pieces and washed twice with 30 ml of HBSS containing 10% FBS and 2mM
EDTA on an orbital shaker at 250 rpms for 30 min at 37°C. After washing,
the colons were finely minced and digested with 20 ml of HBSS containing
10% FBS, 1.5 mg/ml Type VIII Collagenase (C2139; Sigma-Aldrich) and 40
μg/ml DNase I (4527; Sigma-Aldrich) at 200 rpms for 20 min at
37°C. After the digestion, the digested colonic lamina propria (cLP)
cells were filtered through a 100 μm strainer, centrifuged at 1,500 rpm
for 5 min at 4 °C and resuspended in 2 ml MACS buffer for flow
cytometric analysis or fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)[46].For flow cytometric analysis, cLP cells were incubated with mouse
Fcγ II/III receptor blocker (553141; BD Pharmingen) for 15 min on ice
and were then stained with the following labeled antibodies for 30 min on ice:
Brilliant Violet 421-conjugated anti-CD45 (103133; Biolegend), PE-conjugated
anti-IAb (553552; BD Pharmingen), APC-Cy7-conjugated anti-CD11c
(117324; Biolegend), PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-CD11b (101216; Biolegend),
APC-conjugated anti-CD103 (17-1031-80; eBioscience), and Alexa Fluor
488-conjugated anti-F4/80 (123120; Biolegend). Samples were washed twice in MACS
buffer and were analyzed on a BD LSR II flow cytometry at the UNC Flow Cytometry
Core Facility. Dead cells and doublets were excluded from the cLP mononuclear
based on appropriate forward and side scatter plots. Antigen-presenting cells
(APC) were defined as CD45+I-Ab+.
Macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) populations were firstly categorized by the
expression of CD11b and CD11c and then further characterized by CD103 and F4/80
expression as previously described[46].For cLP macrophage and DC FACS separation and ex vivo
stimulation, CD11b+ and CD11c+ microbeads
(Miltenyi Biotec) were used to enrich CD11b+ or
CD11c+ positive cells. The enriched cells were stained
with labeled antibodies aforementioned. Stained cells were sorted to purify the
indicated population at the UNC Flow Cytometry Core Facility. Sorted macrophages
and DCs were seeded in a 96-well plates (0.5~1X105 cells per well)
with 200 μl RPMI medium containing 10% FBS. For cecal content
stimulation, cecal contents were generated from wild-type mice as described
elsewhere[47] and were
added to the cell culture medium at a 1:200 dilution for 3 hours. Total RNA was
then isolated by TRIzol according to the manufacturer’s instructions
(Thermo Fisher Scientific) for qRT-PCR analysis.
Design of Lachnospiraceae specific primers
Lachnospiraceae strains were identified utilizing an
adapted version of the plate wash PCR technique[48]. This allowed for rapid screening by PCR
using phylotype specific primers of the 16S rRNA gene to screen selective media
plates in order to identify conditions that enrich for specific bacteria. To
generate Lachnospiraceae specific primers the near full length
16S rRNA gene sequence from 34 bacterial strains were used to generate CLUSTALW
multiple-sequence alignments. The 16S rRNA gene sequences used were the
following: 9 of the most represented bacterial sequences from the murine large
intestine found in Berry, et al.[49] (Akkermansia muciniphila,
Alistipes finegoldii, Bacteroides
acidifaciens, Barnesiella intestinihominis,
Clostridium propionicum, Enterococcus
faecalis, Eubacterium siraeum,
Oscillibacter valericigenes, Ruminococcus
flavefaciens), 4 Firmicutes (Clostridium
difficile, Enterococcus faecalis, Lactobacillus
murinus, and Staphylococcus xylosus), 6
Lachnospiraceae (Clostridium aldenense,
Clostridium bolteae, Clostridium
citroniae, Clostridium indolis, Clostridium
propionicum, Clostridium xylosus), 3
Lachnospiraceae strains isolated in Reeves et al.[26] (D4, G11, and E7), and 12 of
the most represented Lachnospiraceae-classified OTUs from
Reeves, et al.[26]. Areas of
homology between Lachnospiraceae sequences that were not
homologous to other Firmicutes and
Bacteroidetes were used to create 4
Lachnospiraceae specific 16S rRNA forward gene primers:
Lachno419F (5′ –GAC GCC GCG TGA GTG AAG AAG TAT- 3′),
Lachno428F (5′ –GTA AAG CTC TAT CAG CAG GGA AGA- 3′),
Lachno481F (5′ –GAC GGT ACC TGA CTA AGA AGC CC- 3′), and
Lachno462F (5′ –GTC CAC AGG ACT TTG GAC GG- 3′). The
primer LachF (5′-CC GCA TAA GCG CAC AGC- 3′) from Reeves, et
al.[26] was also
utilized in this study. These forward primers were used with the 16S rRNA
reverse gene primer 1492R (5′-GGT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T- 3′) for
PCR amplification. One Lachnospiraceae specific reverse primer
was also created: Lachno1261R (5′-TCG CTT CCC TTT GTT TAC GC-
3′), which was used with the 16S rRNA forward gene primer 8F
(5′-AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG- 3′) for PCR amplification. The
specificity and coverage of the Lachnospiraceae primers (Supplementary Table 6)
was obtained using the Ribosomal Database Project Probe Match tool (https://rdp.cme.msu.edu/probematch/search.jsp accessed on May
19, 2012). Additionally, primers were tested with Gram-negative bacteria
Bacteroides fragilis Escherichia coli; Gram-positive
bacteria Lactobacillus murinus, Staphylococcus
aureus, Staphylococcus pneumonia; Clostridium
difficile strain VPI 10463 to ensure specificity to
Lachnospiraceae.PCR was performed with 1 μl of template DNA (approximately 100
ng), 20 pmol of each primer, 8mM dNTP master mix (Promega-U1511), 1 unit GoTaq
DNA polymerase (Promega- M3005), PCR buffer (Promega- M3005) and water in a
total of 25 μl per reaction. PCR reaction was performed under the
following cycling conditions: 95°C for 2 min, 30 cycles of 95°C
for 30 sec, annealing at 57°C for 45 sec, and extension at 72°C
for 90 sec, 72°C for 10 min.
Bacterial isolation and selective growth conditions
Three of the Lachnospiraceae isolates
(Lachnospiraceae D4, G11, and E7) used in this study were
reported previously[26]. The
remaining 20 strains were isolated from murine cecal contents, cecal tissue and
stool. Mouse stool was collected into a sterile tube directly from a restrained
mouse and immediately transferred into an anaerobic chamber (Coy Industries,
Grass Lake, MI). Ceca from C57BL/6 mice were collected in a sterile manner and
immediately transferred into an anaerobic chamber. A sterile scalpel was used to
open the cecum and separate cecal content and cecal tissue. Cecal content was
added to a sterile tube and diluted into anaerobic 1X phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS). Using a sterile syringe 2 ml of PBS was gently injected into the cecum to
remove any additional cecal content. The cecal tissue was then added to 1 ml of
anaerobic PBS and placed into a sterile container for tissue homogenization (50
μm pore size) using a Medimachine tissue homogenizer (BD Biosciences).
The tissue was grinded for 15 seconds and homogenized tissue was used for
plating. The cecal contents, cecal tissue homogenization and stool was serial
diluted in anaerobic PBS and plated in duplicate onto brain heart infusion agar
(BD Biosciences) with 0.01% cysteine (BHI).A variety of media conditions were used to enrich for
Lachnospiraceae isolates. Bacterial growth from the first
agar plate was collected and genomic bacterial DNA was isolated using an
Easy-DNA (Invitrogen) kit. Using the Lachnospiraceae specific
primers and PCR conditions described above, we identified several media
conditions that were enriched for Lachnospiraceae strains. Once
a media condition was identified that enriched for
Lachnospiraceae strains, single colonies from the duplicate
plate were used to inoculate 1 ml of BHI + 5% fetal bovine serum
(FBS) into a sterile 96-well plate. These cultures were grown anaerobically for
3 days at 37°C, and then 1 μl of the liquid culture was used as
a template for the PCR reaction described above. The
Lachnospiraceae-specific primers from (Supplementary Table 6) were used to
identify potential Lachnospiraceae isolates. If any of the
primers used yielded a successful PCR reaction, 50 μl of the
corresponding culture was plated for single colonies anaerobically on BHI
+ 5% FBS for one to three days at 37°C. A single colony
was used to inoculate a 5 ml BHI + 5% FBS culture that grew
anaerobically for one to three days at 37°C. This culture was used to
create 20% final concentration glycerol stocks of all the isolates that
were stored at −80°C.The following media conditions were used to isolate
Lachnospiraceae strains in this study: BHI +
5% FBS; BHI + 1 μg/mL aztreonam + 10
μg/mL colistin + 2 μg/mL gentamicin; and BHI +
0.5 μg/mL ampicillin + 2 μg/mL erythromycin +
0.25 μg/mL vancomycin. Single colonies from the duplicate plate were
used to inoculate 1 ml of BHI + 5% FBS. Specific media
conditions used to isolate each Lachnospiraceae strains are
defined in (Supplementary
Table 7).
Taxonomic classification of bacterial isolates
Genomic DNA was isolated using an Easy-DNA (Invitrogen) kit. PCR
reaction conditions were described above and PCR product cleanup was performed
using ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix) per the manufactures protocol. Near full-length 16S
rRNA amplicons were sequenced at the University of Michigan DNA Sequencing Core
using primers 8F (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG- 3′), 515F
(5′-GTG CCA GCM GCC GCG GTA- 3′), E939R (5′-CTT GTG CGG
GCC CCC GTC AAT TC- 3′), and 1492R (5′-GGT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT
T- 3′). CLUSTALW multiple-sequence alignments were generated for each
isolate and a near-full length 16S rRNA gene consensus sequence was obtained.
The consensus sequence was taxonomically classified using the RDP classifier
(https://rdp.cme.msu.edu/classifier/classifier.jsp accessed
between 6-29-2012 and 3-7-2013)[50]. Bacterial strains that classified to the family
Lachnospiraceae were used in this study ((Supplementary Table 7)).
Mouse Colonization with Lachnospiraceae Bacteria
Mice were orally gavaged with a mixture containing the 23
Lachnospiraceae stains (~1X108 bacteria)
described above in brain-heart infusion broth (BHI) twice a week for 3 weeks.
BHI broth was used as vehicle control. The mice were given DSS 1 week after the
final gavage.
In vivo anti-IL-6R and anti-TNF Treatment
Mice were given 2 mg/kg body weight of anti-IL-6R (Tocilizumab,
Genentech) and anti-TNF (Infliximab, Janssen Biotech) via intraperitoneal
injection twice a week for four weeks prior to DSS exposure and during the 11
day DSS treatment period. Fecal DNA was collected from wild-type littermates and
Nlrp12 littermates before
and after the 4-week antibody treatment period, but prior to DSS treatment.
Metadata Study of Human NLRP12 profiling and microbiome
changes in UC Patients
Raw data from 8 NCBI GEO human UC studies were renormalized and analyzed
by Genespring GX (Agilent Tech). The following studies were used: GSE22619,
GSE42911, GSE14580, GSE16879, GSE13367, GSE65114, GSE21231 and GSE57945. In the
summary panels, the healthy group includes the samples from healthy participants
and normal un-inflamed tissues of the patients, the active group includes the
samples from the patients’ inflamed tissues and the inactive group
includes un-inflamed tissue samples of patients in remission due to the
treatment (anti-TNF, steroids and others).For microbiome changes in IBD patients, we downloaded the raw 16S rRNA
gene sequencing file published by Dirk Gevers et al.[14] from the open-source microbiome
deposition site: QIITA (https://qiita.ucsd.edu/)
under study ID: 1939. This file includes 16S microbiome sequencing results from
28 healthy controls, 63 colonic Crohn’s disease patients (cCD), 156
ileal Crohn’s disease patients (iCD) and 24 UC patients. Raw sequencing
data was reanalyzed as aforementioned. Significantly altered bacterial strains
were identified by comparing IBD (cCD, iCD and UC) patients against healthy
participants.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 6 software.
Significance between two groups was determined by unpaired, two-tailed
Student’s t test, and significance between multiple
groups was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with
Fisher’s LSD test. A paired, two-tailed Student’s
t test was used to compare NLRP12 mRNA
between monozygotic twins in (Fig. 1a). A
two-way ANOVA test was used to identify the significantly changed microbial
groups among all strains identified by 16s microbiome sequencing between
different experimental conditions. Statistical significance for survival studies
was determined by Log-rank (Mantel Cox) test. For immunoblots and dot plots, one
dot or lane represents one mouse. Microbiome compositional dissimilarity was
displayed by PCoA plots and quantified by UniFrac Distance values, and
significant separation of the microbiome composition was determined by ANOSIM
test using Qiime 1.8.0. The distribution of the UniFrac Distance values were
displayed in Tukey’s boxplots, which display the first (bottom of the
box) and third quartiles (top of the box), the median (the line inside the box)
and 1.5 interquartile range of the upper or lower quartile (whiskers). For all
statistical comparisons, *p<0.05, **p<0.01,
***p<0.001,
****p<0.0001 and n.s. means no significance.
The error bar represents mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Authors: Scott A Handley; Chandni Desai; Guoyan Zhao; Lindsay Droit; Cynthia L Monaco; Andrew C Schroeder; Joseph P Nkolola; Megan E Norman; Andrew D Miller; David Wang; Dan H Barouch; Herbert W Virgin Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 21.023
Authors: Yael Haberman; Timothy L Tickle; Phillip J Dexheimer; Mi-Ok Kim; Dora Tang; Rebekah Karns; Robert N Baldassano; Joshua D Noe; Joel Rosh; James Markowitz; Melvin B Heyman; Anne M Griffiths; Wallace V Crandall; David R Mack; Susan S Baker; Curtis Huttenhower; David J Keljo; Jeffrey S Hyams; Subra Kugathasan; Thomas D Walters; Bruce Aronow; Ramnik J Xavier; Dirk Gevers; Lee A Denson Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Irving C Allen; Justin E Wilson; Monika Schneider; John D Lich; Reid A Roberts; Janelle C Arthur; Rita-Marie T Woodford; Beckley K Davis; Joshua M Uronis; Hans H Herfarth; Christian Jobin; Arlin B Rogers; Jenny P-Y Ting Journal: Immunity Date: 2012-04-12 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Jorge Henao-Mejia; Eran Elinav; Chengcheng Jin; Liming Hao; Wajahat Z Mehal; Till Strowig; Christoph A Thaiss; Andrew L Kau; Stephanie C Eisenbarth; Michael J Jurczak; Joao-Paulo Camporez; Gerald I Shulman; Jeffrey I Gordon; Hal M Hoffman; Richard A Flavell Journal: Nature Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Nicholas Arpaia; Clarissa Campbell; Xiying Fan; Stanislav Dikiy; Joris van der Veeken; Paul deRoos; Hui Liu; Justin R Cross; Klaus Pfeffer; Paul J Coffer; Alexander Y Rudensky Journal: Nature Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Gil Benedek; Jun Zhang; Ha Nguyen; Gail Kent; Hilary A Seifert; Sean Davin; Patrick Stauffer; Arthur A Vandenbark; Lisa Karstens; Mark Asquith; Halina Offner Journal: J Neuroimmunol Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Liang Chen; Justin E Wilson; Mark J Koenigsknecht; Wei-Chun Chou; Stephanie A Montgomery; Agnieszka D Truax; W June Brickey; Christopher D Packey; Nitsan Maharshak; Glenn K Matsushima; Scott E Plevy; Vincent B Young; R Balfour Sartor; Jenny P-Y Ting Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2017-10-18 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Liang Chen; Justin E Wilson; Mark J Koenigsknecht; Wei-Chun Chou; Stephanie A Montgomery; Agnieszka D Truax; W June Brickey; Christopher D Packey; Nitsan Maharshak; Glenn K Matsushima; Scott E Plevy; Vincent B Young; R Balfour Sartor; Jenny P-Y Ting Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Zora Djuric; Christine M Bassis; Melissa A Plegue; Ananda Sen; D Kim Turgeon; Kirk Herman; Vincent B Young; Dean E Brenner; Mack T Ruffin Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 4.798