Literature DB >> 28287737

Large-Scale SRM Screen of Urothelial Bladder Cancer Candidate Biomarkers in Urine.

Elodie Duriez1, Christophe D Masselon2,3,4, Cédric Mesmin1, Magali Court2,3,4, Kevin Demeure5, Yves Allory6, Núria Malats7, Mariette Matondo8, François Radvanyi9,10, Jérôme Garin2,3,4, Bruno Domon1.   

Abstract

Urothelial bladder cancer is a condition associated with high recurrence and substantial morbidity and mortality. Noninvasive urinary tests that would detect bladder cancer and tumor recurrence are required to significantly improve patient care. Over the past decade, numerous bladder cancer candidate biomarkers have been identified in the context of extensive proteomics or transcriptomics studies. To translate these findings in clinically useful biomarkers, the systematic evaluation of these candidates remains the bottleneck. Such evaluation involves large-scale quantitative LC-SRM (liquid chromatography-selected reaction monitoring) measurements, targeting hundreds of signature peptides by monitoring thousands of transitions in a single analysis. The design of highly multiplexed SRM analyses is driven by several factors: throughput, robustness, selectivity and sensitivity. Because of the complexity of the samples to be analyzed, some measurements (transitions) can be interfered by coeluting isobaric species resulting in biased or inconsistent estimated peptide/protein levels. Thus the assessment of the quality of SRM data is critical to allow flagging these inconsistent data. We describe an efficient and robust method to process large SRM data sets, including the processing of the raw data, the detection of low-quality measurements, the normalization of the signals for each protein, and the estimation of protein levels. Using this methodology, a variety of proteins previously associated with bladder cancer have been assessed through the analysis of urine samples from a large cohort of cancer patients and corresponding controls in an effort to establish a priority list of most promising candidates to guide subsequent clinical validation studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bladder cancer; candidate biomarkers; large-scale SRM screen; mass spectrometry; noninvasive; targeted proteomics; urine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28287737     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  5 in total

1.  A Targeted Mass Spectrometry Strategy for Developing Proteomic Biomarkers: A Case Study of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Ruth Hüttenhain; Meena Choi; Laura Martin de la Fuente; Kathrin Oehl; Ching-Yun Chang; Anne-Kathrin Zimmermann; Susanne Malander; Håkan Olsson; Silvia Surinova; Timothy Clough; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz; Peter J Wild; Daniela M Dinulescu; Emma Niméus; Olga Vitek; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Rapidly Assessing the Quality of Targeted Proteomics Experiments through Monitoring Stable-Isotope Labeled Standards.

Authors:  Bryson C Gibbons; Thomas L Fillmore; Yuqian Gao; Ronald J Moore; Tao Liu; Ernesto S Nakayasu; Thomas O Metz; Samuel H Payne
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 3.  Clinical potential of mass spectrometry-based proteogenomics.

Authors:  Bing Zhang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Geoffrey S Baird; Karin D Rodland; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Tailored Use of Targeted Proteomics in Plant-Specific Applications.

Authors:  Anja Rödiger; Sacha Baginsky
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 5.  Trends in urine biomarker discovery for urothelial bladder cancer: DNA, RNA, or protein?

Authors:  Nada Humayun-Zakaria; Douglas G Ward; Roland Arnold; Richard T Bryan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.