Literature DB >> 28287077

Bone regeneration in 3D printing bioactive ceramic scaffolds with improved tissue/material interface pore architecture in thin-wall bone defect.

Huifeng Shao1, Xiurong Ke, An Liu, Miao Sun, Yong He, Xianyan Yang, Jianzhong Fu, Yanming Liu, Lei Zhang, Guojing Yang, Sanzhong Xu, Zhongru Gou.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing bioactive ceramics have demonstrated alternative approaches to bone tissue repair, but an optimized materials system for improving the recruitment of host osteogenic cells into the bone defect and enhancing targeted repair of the thin-wall craniomaxillofacial defects remains elusive. Herein we systematically evaluated the role of side-wall pore architecture in the direct-ink-writing bioceramic scaffolds on mechanical properties and osteogenic capacity in rabbit calvarial defects. The pure calcium silicate (CSi) and dilute Mg-doped CSi (CSi-Mg6) scaffolds with different layer thickness and macropore sizes were prepared by varying the layer deposition mode from single-layer printing (SLP) to double-layer printing (DLP) and then by undergoing one-, or two-step sintering. It was found that the dilute Mg doping and/or two-step sintering schedule was especially beneficial for improving the compressive strength (∼25-104 MPa) and flexural strength (∼6-18 MPa) of the Ca-silicate scaffolds. The histological analysis for the calvarial bone specimens in vivo revealed that the SLP scaffolds had a high osteoconduction at the early stage (4 weeks) but the DLP scaffolds displayed a higher osteogenic capacity for a long time stage (8-12 weeks). Although the DLP CSi scaffolds displayed somewhat higher osteogenic capacity at 8 and 12 weeks, the DLP CSi-Mg6 scaffolds with excellent fracture resistance also showed appreciable new bone tissue ingrowth. These findings demonstrate that the side-wall pore architecture in 3D printed bioceramic scaffolds is required to optimize for bone repair in calvarial bone defects, and especially the Mg doping wollastontie is promising for 3D printing thin-wall porous scaffolds for craniomaxillofacial bone defect treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28287077     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa663c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  19 in total

Review 1.  [The latest study on biomimetic mineralized collagen-based bone materials for pediatric skull regeneration and repair].

Authors:  Bo Li; Shuo Wang; Yonggang Zhao; Xiumei Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-03-15

2.  The influence of osteopontin-guided collagen intrafibrillar mineralization on pericyte differentiation and vascularization of engineered bone scaffolds.

Authors:  Cristiane M França; Greeshma Thrivikraman; Avathamsa Athirasala; Anthony Tahayeri; Laurie B Gower; Luiz E Bertassoni
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.368

3.  3D-Plotted Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds with Smaller Pore Sizes Improve In Vivo Bone Regeneration and Biomechanical Properties in a Critical-Sized Calvarial Defect Rat Model.

Authors:  Jingjing Diao; Jun OuYang; Ting Deng; Xiao Liu; Yanting Feng; Naru Zhao; Chuanbin Mao; Yingjun Wang
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 9.933

4.  Novel exploration of customized 3D printed shoulder prosthesis in revision of total shoulder arthroplasty: A case report.

Authors:  Yun Zou; Yingying Yang; Qing Han; Kerong Yang; Kesong Zhang; Jincheng Wang; Yongwei Zou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  scafSLICR: A MATLAB-based slicing algorithm to enable 3D-printing of tissue engineering scaffolds with heterogeneous porous microarchitecture.

Authors:  Ethan Nyberg; Aine O'Sullivan; Warren Grayson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 6.  The Impact of Bioceramic Scaffolds on Bone Regeneration in Preclinical In Vivo Studies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giulia Brunello; Sourav Panda; Lucia Schiavon; Stefano Sivolella; Lisa Biasetto; Massimo Del Fabbro
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 7.  Application of biomaterials for the repair and treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Dewei Zhao; Zhijie Ma
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2020-01-14

8.  Effect of strontium-containing on the properties of Mg-doped wollastonite bioceramic scaffolds.

Authors:  Su Wang; Linlin Liu; Xin Zhou; Danfeng Yang; Zhang'ao Shi; Yongqiang Hao
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 9.  Comprehensive In Vitro Testing of Calcium Phosphate-Based Bioceramics with Orthopedic and Dentistry Applications.

Authors:  Radu Albulescu; Adrian-Claudiu Popa; Ana-Maria Enciu; Lucian Albulescu; Maria Dudau; Ionela Daniela Popescu; Simona Mihai; Elena Codrici; Sevinci Pop; Andreea-Roxana Lupu; George E Stan; Gina Manda; Cristiana Tanase
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Influence of Geometry and Architecture on the In Vivo Success of 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Mitchell Hallman; J Adam Driscoll; Ryan Lubbe; Soyeon Jeong; Kevin Chang; Meraaj Haleem; Adam Jakus; Richard Pahapill; Chawon Yun; Ramille Shah; Wellington K Hsu; Stuart R Stock; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.