| Literature DB >> 28286740 |
Amanda J Drilling1, Mian L Ooi1, Dijana Miljkovic1, Craig James2, Peter Speck3, Sarah Vreugde1, Jason Clark4, Peter-John Wormald1.
Abstract
Background:Staphylococcus aureus biofilms contribute negatively to a number of chronic conditions, including chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). With the inherent tolerance of biofilm-bound bacteria to antibiotics and the global problem of bacterial antibiotic resistance, the need to develop novel therapeutics is paramount. Phage therapy has previously shown promise in treating sinonasal S. aureus biofilms.Entities:
Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus; bacteriophage; cilia; inflammation; therapeutic safety; topical
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28286740 PMCID: PMC5323412 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Sensitivity of .
| A1 | LWO | LWO | LWO |
| A2 | +++ (0.07) | ++ (0.006) | +++ (0.3) |
| A3 | + (0.004) | + (0.0003) | + (0.003) |
| B1 | +++ (0.7) | + (0.0006) | +++ (0.5) |
| B2 | LWO | +++ (0.2) | +++ (0.2) |
| C1 | LWO | ++ (0.0002) | + (0.0003) |
| C2 | ++ (0.2) | R | ++ (0.1) |
| C3 | + (0.02) | R | + (0.02) |
| C4 | R | + (2.7E-06) | + (4E-06) |
| C5 | + (0.002) | LWO | + (0.004) |
| C6 | R | + (6E-06) | + (4E-06) |
| D1 | LWO | R | LWO |
| D2 | R | R | R |
| D3 | LWO | + (0.003) | + (0.9) |
| D4 | LWO | R | LWO |
| E | +++ (0.5) | +++ (0.26) | +++ (0.6) |
| F | +++ (0.02) | +++ (0.19) | +++ (0.29) |
| G | + (0.007) | R | + (0.008) |
| H1 | LWO | LWO | LWO |
| H2 | R | +++ (2) | +++ (3) |
| H3 | R | R | R |
| H4 | +++(0.58) | +++ (3) | +++ (3) |
| H5 | +++ (0.19) | +++ (0.02) | +++ (0.53) |
| H6 | +++ (0.3) | +++ (1.1) | +++ (2) |
| I1 | +++ (4) | +++ (2) | +++ (5) |
| I2 | +++ (0.3) | +++(0.03) | +++ (3) |
| J | +++ (0.13) | +++ (4) | +++ (6) |
| K | +++ (0.74) | +++ (0.04) | +++ (0.79) |
| L | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| M | +++ | LWO | +++ |
| N1 | LWO | ++ | ++ |
| N2 | +++ (0.25) | ++ (0.9) | +++ (0.6) |
| N3 | +++ (0.1) | +++ (0.5) | +++ (3) |
| O1 | +++ (0.5) | +++ (1.3) | +++ (0.4) |
| O2 | +++ (0.2) | + (0.0006) | +++ (0.5) |
| O3 | +++ (0.14) | R | +++ (0.16) |
| P | LWO | LWO | LWO |
| Q | LWO | +++ (0.24) | +++ (0.14) |
| R1 | R | +++ (4) | +++ (6) |
| R1 | R | ++ (0.15) | ++ (0.2) |
| R2 | +++ (0.09) | +++ (3.8) | +++ (2.7) |
| R3 | R | +++ (5.3) | +++ (8) |
| R3 | R | +++ (0.9) | +++ (1.1) |
| R4 | R | +++ (2) | +++ (3) |
| R5 | +++ (0.4) | +++ (2) | +++ (3.3) |
| R6 | +++ (0.27) | +++ (2.7) | +++ (4) |
| S1 | ++ (0.05) | + (0.0038) | ++ (0.11) |
| S2 | +++ (0.08) | ++ (0.001) | +++ (0.4) |
| T1 | LWO | R | LWO |
| T2 | LWO | +++ (6.7) | +++ (5.3) |
| T3 | +++ (0.07) | +++ (0.47) | +++ (0.27) |
| T3 | +++ (0.04) | +++ (0.74) | +++ (0.79) |
| T4 | +++ (0.6) | R | +++ (1.2) |
| T5 | LWO | +++ (0.19) | +++ (0.53) |
| U | +++ (0.7) | ++ (0.0006) | +++ (0.54) |
| V1 | +++ (0.27) | +++ (0.03) | +++ (0.25) |
| V1 | +++ (0.1) | +++ (0.4) | +++ (7.3) |
| W | LWO | R | LWO |
| X | +++ (0.93) | +++ (0.09) | +++ (1.2) |
| Y1 | +++ (0.12) | +++ (0.02) | +++ (0.3) |
| Y2 | LWO | +++ (0.15) | +++ (1.13) |
Showing lysis of S. aureus isolates distinguished on the basis of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (“pulsotypes”). NOV012 lysed 52/61 (85%) of isolates. LWO, lysis from without; R, resistant; +, slightly sensitive; ++, moderately sensitive; +++, highly sensitive. Gray shaded isolates represent MRSA strains. All strains where obtained from The Queen Elizabeth hospital, Woodville, Australia.
Figure 1Haematoxylin and eosin stained sheep nasal mucosa sections. Sections are of tissues taken from animals euthanized after 20 days of treatment as below. No differences in tissue inflammation, oedema, fibrosis and the presence or absence of goblet cell hyperplasia was observed between treatment groups (A,B) control, (C,D) heat-inactivated NOV012 (Hip) treatment and (E,F) active NOV012 treatment.
Figure 2Representative images of sheep nasal mucosa viewed using scanning electron microscopy and analysis of cilia coverage. Cilia coverage and morphology were similar between all treatment groups including (A) control, (B) heat-inactivated NOV012 (Hip) treatment, and (C) active NOV012 treatment. (D) Five images of each tissue section were captured at 2500× magnification, divided into 2 cm2 grid sections and each grid scored according to 1, full cilia coverage; 0.5, some cilia coverage; 0, no cilia present. This graph shows the average percentage coverage across the three treatment groups, no statistical difference was observed between the groups.