Literature DB >> 28286093

Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: an international external interobserver and intraobserver study (with videos).

Somashekar G Krishna1, William R Brugge2, John M Dewitt3, Pradermchai Kongkam4, Bertrand Napoleon5, Carlos Robles-Medranda6, Damien Tan7, Samer El-Dika1, Sean McCarthy1, Jon Walker1, Mary E Dillhoff8, Andrei Manilchuk9, Carl Schmidt8, Benjamin Swanson10, Zarine K Shah11, Phil A Hart1, Darwin L Conwell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) characteristics of common types of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have been identified; however, surgical histopathology was available in a minority of cases. We sought to assess the performance characteristics of EUS nCLE for differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous PCLs in a larger series of patients with a definitive diagnosis.
METHODS: Six endosonographers (nCLE experience >30 cases each) blinded to all clinical data, reviewed nCLE images of PCLs from 29 patients with surgical (n = 23) or clinical (n = 6) correlation. After 2 weeks, the assessors reviewed the same images in a different sequence. A tutorial on available and novel nCLE image patterns was provided before each review. The performance characteristics of nCLE and the κ statistic for interobserver agreement (IOA, 95% confidence interval [CI]), and intraobserver reliability (IOR, mean ± standard deviation [SD]) for identification of nCLE image patterns were calculated. Landis and Koch interpretation of κ values was used.
RESULTS: A total of 29 (16 mucinous PCLs, 13 non-mucinous PCLs) nCLE patient videos were reviewed. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of mucinous PCLs were 95%, 94%, and 95%, respectively. The IOA and IOR (mean ± SD) were κ = 0.81 (almost perfect); 95% CI, 0.71-0.90; and κ = 0.86 ± 0.11 (almost perfect), respectively. The overall specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of serous cystadenomas (SCAs) were 99%, 98%, and 98%, respectively. The IOA and IOR (mean ± SD) for recognizing the characteristic image pattern of SCA were κ = 0.83 (almost perfect); 95% CI, 0.73-0.92; and κ = 0.85 ± 0.11 (almost perfect), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided nCLE can provide virtual histology of PCLs with a high degree of accuracy and inter- and intraobserver agreement in differentiating mucinous versus non-mucinous PCLs. These preliminary results support larger multicenter studies to evaluate EUS nCLE. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02516488.).
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28286093     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  25 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.

Authors:  Mathew James Keegan; Bharat Paranandi
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-01

2.  SAGES TAVAC safety and efficacy analysis confocal laser endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Mazen R Al-Mansour; Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Brian R Davis; Abdulrahim Alawashez; Salvatore Docimo; Alia Qureshi; Shawn Tsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Speckle illumination holographic non-scanning fluorescence endoscopy.

Authors:  Wei-Tang Lin; Chen-Yen Lin; Vijay Raj Singh; Yuan Luo
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.207

Review 4.  Confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastro-intestinal endoscopy: technical aspects and clinical applications.

Authors:  Nastazja Dagny Pilonis; Wladyslaw Januszewicz; Massimiliano di Pietro
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-25

5.  Diagnostic value of SpyGlass for pancreatic cystic lesions: comparison of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration combined with SpyGlass.

Authors:  Chen Du; Ningli Chai; Enqiang Linghu; Huikai Li; Xiuxue Feng; Xiangdong Wang; Ping Tang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Can endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy replace fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic and mediastinal diseases?

Authors:  Jintao Guo; Manoop S Bhutani; Marc Giovannini; Zhaoshen Li; Zhendong Jin; Aiming Yang; Guoqiang Xu; Guiqi Wang; Siyu Sun
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

7.  In vivo and ex vivo confocal endomicroscopy of pancreatic cystic lesions: A prospective study.

Authors:  Somashekar G Krishna; Rohan M Modi; Amrit K Kamboj; Benjamin J Swanson; Phil A Hart; Mary E Dillhoff; Andrei Manilchuk; Carl R Schmidt; Darwin L Conwell
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Novel investigative modalities for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: Does increased diagnostic accuracy justify the high costs?

Authors:  Somashekar G Krishna
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-10-09

Review 9.  Confocal endomicroscopy and cyst fluid molecular analysis: Comprehensive evaluation of pancreatic cysts.

Authors:  Feng Li; Ahmad Malli; Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate; Darwin L Conwell; Somashekar G Krishna
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-01-16

10.  Endoscopic ultrasound guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in solid pancreatic masses - a prospective validation study.

Authors:  John Gásdal Karstensen; Tatiana Cârţână; Codruţa Constantinescu; Silviu Dumitrașcu; Bojan Kovacevic; Pia Klausen; Hazem Hassan; Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen; Helga Bertani; Manoop S Bhutani; Adrian Săftoiu; Peter Vilmann
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.