Janet S Rader1, Michael W Sill2, Jan H Beumer3, Heather A Lankes4, Doris Mangiaracina Benbrook5, Francisco Garcia6, Connie Trimble7, J Tate Thigpen8, Richard Lieberman9, Rosemary E Zuna10, Charles A Leath11, Nick M Spirtos12, John Byron13, Premal H Thaker14, Shashikant Lele15, David Alberts16. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States. Electronic address: jrader@mcw.edu. 2. NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistics & Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States. Electronic address: msill@gogstats.org. 3. Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States. Electronic address: beumerjh@upmc.edu. 4. NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistics & Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States. Electronic address: hlankes@gogstats.org. 5. Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73165. Electronic address: Doris-Benbrook@ouhsc.edu. 6. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Arizona, Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ 85724, United States. Electronic address: Francisco.Garcia@pima.gov. 7. Division of Gynecologic Specialties, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States. Electronic address: ctrimbl@jhmi.edu. 8. Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, United States. 9. Division of OB/GYN and Pathology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States. Electronic address: jakrwl@med.umich.edu. 10. Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States. Electronic address: Rosemary-Zuna@ouhsc.edu. 11. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, United States. Electronic address: cleath@uabmc.edu. 12. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89169, United States. Electronic address: nspirtos@wccenter.com. 13. Department of OB/GYN, First Health of the Carolinas - Moore Regional Hospital, Southern Pines, NC 28388, United States. Electronic address: JByron@spwhc.com. 14. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, United States. Electronic address: thakerp@wudosis.wustl.edu. 15. Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States. Electronic address: shashi.lele@roswellpark.org. 16. Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Arizona Cancer Center-North Campus, Tucson, AZ 85724, United States. Electronic address: DAlberts@uacc.arizona.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the effect of celecoxib on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (CIN 3). This is a NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study with translational biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with CIN 3 were randomized to celecoxib 400mg once daily (67 patients) or placebo (63 patients) for 14-18weeks. The primary outcome measure was histologic regression. A test of equal probabilities of success between two therapies was conducted, using Fisher's Exact Test at alpha=10% and 90% power when the treatment arm boosted the probability of success by 30%. Translational analysis included cervical tissue HPV genotyping, COX-2 expression in biopsies, and serum celecoxib and VEGF levels. RESULTS: In primary analysis, histologic regression was not significantly higher in the celecoxib group (40%) than in the placebo group (34.1%). However, exploratory analyses suggest patients with high serum VEGF levels exhibited greater regression in the celecoxib arm (47.3%) than in the placebo arm (14.3%). Regression rates were similar by treatment group in patients with low VEGF. VEGF levels increased over time in the placebo group, but remained the same in the treatment group. COX-2 expression in cervical biopsies declined from pre-treatment to the end of treatment with celecoxib; it did not change with placebo. CONCLUSIONS:Celecoxib at 400mg once daily for 14-18weeks did not significantly decrease the severity of CIN 3 compared with placebo except, possibly, in subjects with high baseline VEGF. Therefore, serum VEGF levels might identify patients who may benefit from celecoxib or other therapies, personalizing future chemoprevention trials for CIN 3.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To examine the effect of celecoxib on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (CIN 3). This is a NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study with translational biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with CIN 3 were randomized to celecoxib 400mg once daily (67 patients) or placebo (63 patients) for 14-18weeks. The primary outcome measure was histologic regression. A test of equal probabilities of success between two therapies was conducted, using Fisher's Exact Test at alpha=10% and 90% power when the treatment arm boosted the probability of success by 30%. Translational analysis included cervical tissue HPV genotyping, COX-2 expression in biopsies, and serum celecoxib and VEGF levels. RESULTS: In primary analysis, histologic regression was not significantly higher in the celecoxib group (40%) than in the placebo group (34.1%). However, exploratory analyses suggest patients with high serum VEGF levels exhibited greater regression in the celecoxib arm (47.3%) than in the placebo arm (14.3%). Regression rates were similar by treatment group in patients with low VEGF. VEGF levels increased over time in the placebo group, but remained the same in the treatment group. COX-2 expression in cervical biopsies declined from pre-treatment to the end of treatment with celecoxib; it did not change with placebo. CONCLUSIONS:Celecoxib at 400mg once daily for 14-18weeks did not significantly decrease the severity of CIN 3 compared with placebo except, possibly, in subjects with high baseline VEGF. Therefore, serum VEGF levels might identify patients who may benefit from celecoxib or other therapies, personalizing future chemoprevention trials for CIN 3.
Authors: Denise H Frank; Denise J Roe; H-H Sherry Chow; Jose M Guillen; Karin Choquette; Debra Gracie; Jennifer Francis; Airley Fish; David S Alberts Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Lori J Wirth; Jeffrey F Krane; Yi Li; Megan Othus; Amy E Moran; David M Dorfman; Charles M Norris; Laura Goguen; Marshall R Posner; Robert I Haddad; Monica M Bertagnolli Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2008-10
Authors: F L Meyskens; E Surwit; T E Moon; J M Childers; J R Davis; R T Dorr; C S Johnson; D S Alberts Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1994-04-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Craig A Elmets; Jaye L Viner; Alice P Pentland; Wendy Cantrell; Hui-Yi Lin; Howard Bailey; Sewon Kang; Kenneth G Linden; Michael Heffernan; Madeleine Duvic; Ellen Richmond; Boni E Elewski; Asad Umar; Walter Bell; Gary B Gordon Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2010-11-29 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Edward R Sauter; Wenyi Qin; John E Hewett; Rachel L Ruhlen; John T Flynn; George Rottinghaus; Yin-Chieh Chen Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2008-02-11 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Simona Roxana Georgescu; Cristina Iulia Mitran; Madalina Irina Mitran; Constantin Caruntu; Maria Isabela Sarbu; Clara Matei; Ilinca Nicolae; Sandra Milena Tocut; Mircea Ioan Popa; Mircea Tampa Journal: J Immunol Res Date: 2018-08-27 Impact factor: 4.818