Paul A VanderLaan1, Deepa Rangachari2, Susan M Mockus3, Vanessa Spotlow3, Honey V Reddi3, Joan Malcolm3, Mark S Huberman2, Loren J Joseph1, Susumu S Kobayashi2, Daniel B Costa4. 1. Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. 2. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. 3. The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States. 4. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: dbcosta@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The degree and duration of response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in EGFR mutated lung cancer are heterogeneous. We hypothesized that the concurrent genomic landscape of these tumors, which is currently unknown in view of the prevailing single gene assay diagnostic paradigm in clinical practice, could play a role in clinical outcomes and/or mechanisms of resistance. METHODS: We retrospectively probed our institutional lung cancer database for tumors with EGFR kinase domain mutations that were also evaluated by more comprehensive molecular profiling, and evaluated tumor response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). RESULTS: Out of 171 EGFR mutated tumor-patient cases, 20 were sequenced using at least a limited comprehensive genomic profiling platform. 50% harbored concurrent TP53 mutation, 10% PIK3CA mutation, 5% PTEN mutation, among others. The response rate to EGFR TKIs, the median progression-free survival (PFS) to TKIs, the percentage of EGFR-T790M TKI resistance and survival had higher trends in EGFR mutant/TP53 wild-type cases when compared to EGFR mutant/TP53 mutant tumors (all p >0.05 without statistical significance); with a significantly longer median PFS in EGFR-exon 19 deletion mutant/TP53 wild-type cancers treated with 1st generation EGFR TKIs (p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent mutations, specifically TP53, are common in EGFR mutated lung cancer and may alter clinical outcomes. Additional cohorts will be needed to determine if comprehensive molecular profiling adds clinically relevant information to single gene assay identification in oncogene-driven lung cancers.
INTRODUCTION: The degree and duration of response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in EGFR mutated lung cancer are heterogeneous. We hypothesized that the concurrent genomic landscape of these tumors, which is currently unknown in view of the prevailing single gene assay diagnostic paradigm in clinical practice, could play a role in clinical outcomes and/or mechanisms of resistance. METHODS: We retrospectively probed our institutional lung cancer database for tumors with EGFR kinase domain mutations that were also evaluated by more comprehensive molecular profiling, and evaluated tumor response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). RESULTS: Out of 171 EGFR mutated tumor-patient cases, 20 were sequenced using at least a limited comprehensive genomic profiling platform. 50% harbored concurrent TP53 mutation, 10% PIK3CA mutation, 5% PTEN mutation, among others. The response rate to EGFR TKIs, the median progression-free survival (PFS) to TKIs, the percentage of EGFR-T790M TKI resistance and survival had higher trends in EGFR mutant/TP53 wild-type cases when compared to EGFR mutant/TP53 mutant tumors (all p >0.05 without statistical significance); with a significantly longer median PFS in EGFR-exon 19 deletion mutant/TP53 wild-type cancers treated with 1st generation EGFR TKIs (p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent mutations, specifically TP53, are common in EGFR mutated lung cancer and may alter clinical outcomes. Additional cohorts will be needed to determine if comprehensive molecular profiling adds clinically relevant information to single gene assay identification in oncogene-driven lung cancers.
Authors: Zongli Zheng; Matthew Liebers; Boryana Zhelyazkova; Yi Cao; Divya Panditi; Kerry D Lynch; Juxiang Chen; Hayley E Robinson; Hyo Sup Shim; Juliann Chmielecki; William Pao; Jeffrey A Engelman; A John Iafrate; Long Phi Le Journal: Nat Med Date: 2014-11-10 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Susumu Kobayashi; Titus J Boggon; Tajhal Dayaram; Pasi A Jänne; Olivier Kocher; Matthew Meyerson; Bruce E Johnson; Michael J Eck; Daniel G Tenen; Balázs Halmos Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-02-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hiroyuki Yasuda; Eunyoung Park; Cai-Hong Yun; Natasha J Sng; Antonio R Lucena-Araujo; Wee-Lee Yeo; Mark S Huberman; David W Cohen; Sohei Nakayama; Kota Ishioka; Norihiro Yamaguchi; Megan Hanna; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Christopher S Lathan; Teresa Moran; Lecia V Sequist; Jamie E Chaft; Gregory J Riely; Maria E Arcila; Ross A Soo; Matthew Meyerson; Michael J Eck; Susumu S Kobayashi; Daniel B Costa Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Paul A Vanderlaan; Norihiro Yamaguchi; Erik Folch; David H Boucher; Michael S Kent; Sidharta P Gangadharan; Adnan Majid; Michael A Goldstein; Mark S Huberman; Olivier N Kocher; Daniel B Costa Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Nicholas McGranahan; Francesco Favero; Elza C de Bruin; Nicolai Juul Birkbak; Zoltan Szallasi; Charles Swanton Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Daniel B Costa; Balázs Halmos; Amit Kumar; Susan T Schumer; Mark S Huberman; Titus J Boggon; Daniel G Tenen; Susumu Kobayashi Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Xiaohong Han; Rongrong Luo; Lin Wang; Lei Zhang; Tao Wang; Yan Zhao; Shanshan Xiao; Nan Qiao; Chi Xu; Lieming Ding; Zhishang Zhang; Yuankai Shi Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Yuebi Hu; Ryan S Alden; Justin I Odegaard; Stephen R Fairclough; Ruthia Chen; Jennifer Heng; Nora Feeney; Rebecca J Nagy; Jayshree Shah; Bryan Ulrich; Martin Gutierrez; Richard B Lanman; Judy E Garber; Cloud P Paweletz; Geoffrey R Oxnard Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-09-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Helena A Yu; Ken Suzawa; Emmet Jordan; Ahmet Zehir; Ai Ni; Ryan Kim; Mark G Kris; Matthew D Hellmann; Bob T Li; Romel Somwar; David B Solit; Michael F Berger; Maria Arcila; Gregory J Riely; Marc Ladanyi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 12.531