Literature DB >> 28285425

Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery.

Shiri Shinar1, Yair Blecher2, Sharon Alpern2, Ariel Many2, Eran Ashwal2, Uri Amikam2, Aviad Cohen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sterilization via bilateral total salpingectomy is slowly replacing partial salpingectomy, as it is believed to decrease the incidence of ovarian cancer. Our objective was to compare short-term intra and post-operative complication rates of bilateral total salpingectomy versus partial salpingectomy performed during the course of a cesarean delivery.
METHODS: A large series of tubal sterilizations during cesarean sections were studied in a single tertiary medical center between 1/2014 and 8/2016 before and after a policy change was made, switching from partial salpingectomy to total salpingectomy. Patients who underwent bilateral partial salpingectomy using the modified Pomeroy technique were compared with those who underwent total salpingectomy. Operative length, estimated blood loss, postpartum fever, wound infection, need for re-laparotomy, hospitalization length, and blood transfusions were compared.
RESULTS: During the study period, 149 women met inclusion criteria. Fifty parturients underwent bilateral total salpingectomy and 99 underwent partial salpingectomy in the course of the cesarean section. Demographic, obstetrical, and surgical characteristics were similar in both groups. Mean cesarean section duration was comparable for partial salpingectomy and total salpingectomy (a median of 35 min in both groups, P = 0.92). Complications were rare in both groups with no significant differences in rates of postpartum fever, wound infection, re-laparotomy, hospitalization length, estimated blood loss, transfusions, and readmissions within 1-month postpartum.
CONCLUSION: Rates of short-term complications are similar in patients undergoing bilateral partial salpingectomy and total salpingectomy during cesarean deliveries, making the latter a feasible alternative to the former.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bilateral; Partial; Postpartum; Salpingectomy; Sterilization; Total

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28285425     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4340-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  5 in total

1.  Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Akila Subramaniam; Christina T Blanchard; Britt K Erickson; Jeff Szychowski; Charles A Leath; Joseph R Biggio; Warner K Huh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Women's preferences for permanent contraception method and willingness to be randomized for a hypothetical trial.

Authors:  Adriana Piazza; Kelly Schwirian; Fiona Scott; Machelle D Wilson; Nikki B Zite; Mitchell D Creinin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  The cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy versus standard tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery for ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  Akila Subramaniam; Brett D Einerson; Christina T Blanchard; Britt K Erickson; Jeff Szychowski; Charles A Leath; Joseph R Biggio; Warner K Huh
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Successful completion of total and partial salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Kristiana Lehn; Linda Gu; Mitchell D Creinin; Melissa J Chen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Bilateral salpingectomy versus bilateral partial salpingectomy during cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Jose R Duncan; Heather L Jones; Stefanie O Hoffer; Mauro H Schenone; Giancarlo Mari
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-10-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.