Literature DB >> 28285042

Learning to argue via apprenticeship.

Lia Papathomas1, Deanna Kuhn2.   

Abstract

We examined apprenticeship, in the form of interaction with a more capable other, as a mechanism of development of higher-order reasoning skills, specifically argumentation. Over a 1-year period, middle school students engaged in twice-weekly electronic dialogs with a sequence of different peers on a series of social issues. In one group, unbeknownst to participants, a highly capable adult substituted for peers in half of their dialogs. Beginning immediately, increasing with time, and extending to peer-only dialogs on a new topic, the quality of argumentation shown by the experimental group exceeded that of a comparison peer-only group, highlighting the power of apprenticeship as a mechanism in the development of reasoning, a demonstration of both theoretical and applied significance.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apprenticeship; Argumentation; Cognitive Development; Collaboration; Critical Thinking; Discourse; Expert Modeling; Reasoning; Social Learning; Sociocultural Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28285042     DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  1 in total

1.  Preschool children's use of meta-talk to make rational collaborative decisions.

Authors:  Kirstie Hartwell; Silke Brandt; Laura Boundy; Grace Barton; Bahar Köymen
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2022-03-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.