Literature DB >> 28284952

Importance of D1 and D2 receptor stimulation for the induction and expression of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in preweanling rats.

Sanders A McDougall1, Krista N Rudberg2, Ana Veliz2, Janhavi M Dhargalkar2, Aleesha S Garcia2, Loveth C Romero2, Ashley E Gonzalez3, Alena Mohd-Yusof2, Cynthia A Crawford2.   

Abstract

The behavioral manifestations of psychostimulant-induced sensitization vary markedly between young and adult rats, suggesting that the neural mechanisms mediating this phenomenon differ across ontogeny. In this project we examined the importance of D1 and D2 receptors for the induction and expression of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization during the preweanling period. In the behavioral experiments, rats were injected with reversible D1 and/or D2 antagonists (SCH23390 and/or raclopride) or an irreversible receptor antagonist (EEDQ) either before cocaine administration on the pretreatment day (induction) or before cocaine challenge on the test day (expression). In the EEDQ experiments, receptor specificity was assessed by using selective dopamine antagonists to protect D1 and/or D2 receptors from inactivation. Receptor binding assays showed that EEDQ caused substantial reductions in dorsal striatal D1 and D2 binding sites, while SCH23390 and raclopride fully protected D1 and D2 receptors from EEDQ-induced alkylation. Behavioral results showed that neither D1 nor D2 receptor stimulation was necessary for the induction of cocaine sensitization in preweanling rats. EEDQ disrupted the sensitization process, suggesting that another receptor type sensitive to EEDQ alkylation was necessary for the induction process. Expression of the sensitized response was prevented by an acute injection of a D1 receptor antagonist. The pattern of DA antagonist-induced effects described for preweanling rats is, with few exceptions, similar to what is observed when the same drugs are administered to adult rats. Thus, it appears that maturational changes in D1 and D2 receptor systems are not responsible for ontogenetic differences in the behavioral manifestation of cocaine sensitization.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral sensitization; Cocaine; EEDQ; Ontogeny; Raclopride; SCH23390

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28284952      PMCID: PMC5422209          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  76 in total

1.  Differential effects of dopamine antagonists on locomotor activity, conditioned activity and conditioned place preference induced by cocaine in rats.

Authors:  J U Adams; J M Careri; T R Efferen; J Rotrosen
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 2.  Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues.

Authors:  Terry E Robinson; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Cocaine conditioning and cocaine sensitization: what is the relationship?

Authors:  R J Carey; J Gui
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Principles and pitfalls in the analysis of prenatal treatment effects in multiparous species.

Authors:  R R Holson; B Pearce
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.763

5.  Longevity of the expression of behavioral sensitization to cocaine in preweanling rats.

Authors:  K J Snyder; N M Katovic; L P Spear
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Mechanisms of locomotor sensitization to drugs of abuse in a two-injection protocol.

Authors:  Emmanuel Valjent; Jesus Bertran-Gonzalez; Benjamin Aubier; Paul Greengard; Denis Hervé; Jean-Antoine Girault
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Effects of irreversible dopamine receptor inactivation on locomotor activity and grooming in the 17- and 90-day-old rat.

Authors:  S A McDougall; C A Crawford; A J Nonneman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Behavioral and radioligand binding evidence for irreversible dopamine receptor blockade by N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline.

Authors:  M W Hamblin; I Creese
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1983-05-09       Impact factor: 5.037

9.  Two dissociable components of behavioral sensitization following repeated amphetamine administration.

Authors:  N J Leith; R Kuczenski
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Are adolescents more vulnerable to drug addiction than adults? Evidence from animal models.

Authors:  Nicole L Schramm-Sapyta; Q David Walker; Joseph M Caster; Edward D Levin; Cynthia M Kuhn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  2 in total

1.  Chronic early-life lead exposure sensitizes adolescent rats to cocaine: Role of the dopaminergic system.

Authors:  Damaris Albores-Garcia; Kirstie H Stansfield; Jennifer L McGlothan; Zoran Bursac; Tomás R Guilarte
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Effects of the monoamine stabilizer, (-)-OSU6162, on cocaine-induced locomotion and conditioned place preference in mice.

Authors:  Laila Asth; Lia P Iglesias; Rayssa C Briânis; Anna P Marçal; Nícia P Soares; Daniele C Aguiar; Fabrício A Moreira
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.000

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.